↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : LCL902+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:45:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  36 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (  24 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   29 (  14   ~;  11   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (   7 sgn  26   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(sos_07,axiom,
    ! [X9,X10,X11] :
      ( '>='('+'(X9,X10),X11)
    <=> '>='(X10,'==>'(X9,X11)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_07) ).

fof(sos_03,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_03) ).

fof(sos_04,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '>='(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_04) ).

fof(sos_06,axiom,
    ! [X7,X8] :
      ( ( '>='(X7,X8)
        & '>='(X8,X7) )
     => X7 = X8 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_06) ).

fof(sos_08,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '>='(X1,'0'),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_08) ).

fof(sos_12,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '+'(X1,'1') = '1',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_12) ).

fof(sos_02,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : '+'(X1,X2) = '+'(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_02) ).

fof(sos_13,axiom,
    ! [X1] : '==>'('==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),X1),X1) = '0',
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',sos_13) ).

fof(goals_14,conjecture,
    ! [X21] : '==>'('==>'(X21,'1'),'1') = X21,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals_14) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X62,X63,X64] :
      ( ( ~ '>='('+'(X62,X63),X64)
        | '>='(X63,'==>'(X62,X64)) )
      & ( ~ '>='(X63,'==>'(X62,X64))
        | '>='('+'(X62,X63),X64) ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_07])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X55] : '+'(X55,'0') = X55,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_03]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( '>='(X2,'==>'(X1,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    '+'(X1,'0') = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X56] : '>='(X56,X56),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_04]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X60,X61] :
      ( ~ '>='(X60,X61)
      | ~ '>='(X61,X60)
      | X60 = X61 ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[sos_06])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( '>='('0','==>'(X1,X2))
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    '>='(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X65] : '>='(X65,'0'),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_08]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ '>='(X1,X2)
    | ~ '>='(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    '>='('0','==>'(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    '>='(X1,'0'),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( '>='('+'(X2,X1),X3)
    | ~ '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    '==>'(X1,X1) = '0',
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X75] : '+'(X75,'1') = '1',
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    '>='('+'(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    '+'(X1,'1') = '1',
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] : '+'(X53,X54) = '+'(X54,X53),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_02]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    '>='('1',X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X76] : '==>'('==>'('==>'(X76,'1'),X76),X76) = '0',
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[sos_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    '+'(X1,X2) = '+'(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( X1 = '1'
    | ~ '>='(X1,'1') ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    '>='('+'(X1,'==>'(X1,X2)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    '==>'('==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),X1),X1) = '0',
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X3))
    | ~ '>='('+'(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    '+'(X1,'==>'(X1,'1')) = '1',
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    '>='('==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),X1),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    '>='(X1,'==>'(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_24]) ).

fof(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X21] : '==>'('==>'(X21,'1'),'1') = X21,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[goals_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    '>='('==>'(X1,'1'),'==>'(X1,X2)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_34]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    '==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),X1) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

fof(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    '==>'('==>'(esk1_0,'1'),'1') != esk1_0,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_37])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    '>='('==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),'1'),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    '>='(X1,'==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),X2)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_27])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    '==>'('==>'(esk1_0,'1'),'1') != esk1_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    '==>'('==>'(X1,'1'),'1') = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_41]),c_0_42])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : LCL902+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v5.5.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:15:18 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------