%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : LCL908+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:34:29 EST 2017 % Result : Satisfiable 23.86s % Output : FiniteModel 23.86s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL908+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n046.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 15:42:04 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.24 % CPUTime : % 23.86/9.57 Nitpicking formula... % 23.86/9.57 Timestamp: 15:42:12 % 23.86/9.57 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.86/9.57 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.86/9.57 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.86/9.57 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.86/9.57 % SZS status Satisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.86/9.57 Nitpick found a model for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 23.86/9.57 % 23.86/9.57 Constants: % 23.86/9.57 bnd_and = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.86/9.57 bnd_and_1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_and_2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_and_3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_cn1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_cn2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_cn3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_equiv = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.86/9.57 bnd_equivalence_1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_equivalence_2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_equivalence_3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies_1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies_2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_implies_3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_is_a_theorem = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 23.86/9.57 bnd_kn1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_kn2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_kn3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_modus_ponens = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_modus_tollens = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_not = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_and = False % 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_equiv = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_implies = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_implies_and = False % 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_implies_or = False % 23.86/9.57 bnd_op_or = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_or = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.86/9.57 bnd_or_1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_or_2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_or_3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_r1 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_r2 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_r3 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_r4 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_r5 = True % 23.86/9.57 bnd_substitution_of_equivalents = True % 23.86/9.57 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.86/9.57 Total time: 861 ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------