%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Nitpick---2016 % Problem : LCL914+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % Computer : n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 2.40GHz % Memory : 32218.75MB % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % CPULimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Jan 17 19:34:30 EST 2017 % Result : Satisfiable 23.32s % Output : FiniteModel 23.32s % Verified : % SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails) % Syntax : Number of formulae : 0 % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL914+1 : TPTP v6.4.0. Released v6.4.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : isabelle tptp_nitpick %d %s % 0.03/0.23 % Computer : n005.star.cs.uiowa.edu % 0.03/0.23 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2609 0 @ 2.40GHz % 0.03/0.23 % Memory : 32218.75MB % 0.03/0.23 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64 % 0.03/0.23 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.23 % DateTime : Sat Jan 14 15:42:33 CST 2017 % 0.03/0.23 % CPUTime : % 23.32/14.87 Nitpicking formula... % 23.32/14.87 Timestamp: 15:42:45 % 23.32/14.87 Using SAT solver "Lingeling_JNI" The following solvers are configured: % 23.32/14.87 "Lingeling_JNI", "CryptoMiniSat_JNI", "MiniSat_JNI", "SAT4J", "SAT4J_Light" % 23.32/14.87 Batch 1 of 20: Trying 5 scopes: % 23.32/14.87 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1 % 23.32/14.87 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 2 % 23.32/14.87 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 3 % 23.32/14.87 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 4 % 23.32/14.87 card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 5 % 23.32/14.87 % SZS status Satisfiable % SZS output start FiniteModel % 23.32/14.87 Nitpick found a model for card TPTP_Interpret.ind = 1: % 23.32/14.87 % 23.32/14.87 Constants: % 23.32/14.87 bnd_adjunction = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_and = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_4 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_5 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_B = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_K = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_M = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_b = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m1 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m10 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m2 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m3 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m4 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m5 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m6 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m7 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m8 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_m9 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_s1 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_s2 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_s3 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_axiom_s4 = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_equiv = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_implies = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_is_a_theorem = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := True) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_modus_ponens_strict_implies = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_necessarily = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_necessitation = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_not = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_and = False % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_equiv = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_implies = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_implies_and = False % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_implies_or = False % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_necessarily = False % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_or = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_possibly = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_strict_equiv = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_op_strict_implies = True % 23.32/14.87 bnd_or = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_possibly = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_strict_equiv = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_strict_implies = (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := (\<lambda>x. _)(i1 := i1)) % 23.32/14.87 bnd_substitution_strict_equiv = True % 23.32/14.87 % SZS output end FiniteModel % 23.32/14.87 Total time: 2.7 s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------