↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LCL982+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:18:13 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.16s 0.46s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   25 (  14   ~;  11   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   94 (  24 sgn  22   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(a5,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X4),implies(implies(implies(X5,implies(X6,X7)),implies(X4,implies(not(X6),not(X3)))),implies(X3,X6)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a5) ).

fof(prove_cn_1,conjecture,
    ! [X3,X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X4),implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(X3,X5)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_1) ).

fof(c_0_3,plain,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X2)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( is_a_theorem(X9)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X8)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X8,X9)) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X10,X11,X12,X13,X14] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X10,X11),implies(implies(implies(X12,implies(X13,X14)),implies(X11,implies(not(X13),not(X10)))),implies(X10,X13)))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[a5]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(X1)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X1,X2))
    | is_a_theorem(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(implies(X3,implies(X4,X5)),implies(X2,implies(not(X4),not(X1)))),implies(X1,X4)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X5,X4))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(X4,implies(not(X2),not(X5)))),implies(X5,X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(implies(implies(implies(X4,implies(X5,X6)),implies(X7,implies(not(X5),not(X8)))),implies(X8,X5)),implies(not(X2),not(implies(X8,X7))))),implies(implies(X8,X7),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,implies(X3,X5)),implies(implies(implies(implies(X6,implies(X7,X8)),implies(X2,implies(not(X7),not(X1)))),implies(X1,X7)),implies(not(X3),not(implies(X1,X2))))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(implies(X3,implies(X4,X5)),implies(implies(X1,X6),implies(not(X4),not(implies(implies(X7,implies(X6,X8)),implies(X2,implies(not(X6),not(X1)))))))),implies(implies(implies(X7,implies(X6,X8)),implies(X2,implies(not(X6),not(X1)))),X4)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_9]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X3,X4,X5] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X3,X4),implies(implies(X4,X5),implies(X3,X5)))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_cn_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(implies(implies(implies(X4,implies(X5,X6)),implies(implies(X7,X8),implies(not(X5),not(implies(implies(X9,implies(X8,X10)),implies(X11,implies(not(X8),not(X7)))))))),implies(implies(implies(X9,implies(X8,X10)),implies(X11,implies(not(X8),not(X7)))),X5)),implies(not(X2),not(implies(X7,X11))))),implies(implies(X7,X11),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0),implies(implies(esk2_0,esk3_0),implies(esk1_0,esk3_0)))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X4,implies(X3,X5)),implies(implies(implies(implies(X6,implies(X7,X8)),implies(implies(X1,X9),implies(not(X7),not(implies(implies(X10,implies(X9,X11)),implies(X2,implies(not(X9),not(X1)))))))),implies(implies(implies(X10,implies(X9,X11)),implies(X2,implies(not(X9),not(X1)))),X7)),implies(not(X3),not(implies(X1,X2))))))
    | is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(X1,implies(X2,X3)),implies(implies(implies(X4,X5),X6),implies(not(X2),not(implies(implies(X7,implies(X6,X8)),implies(implies(implies(implies(X9,implies(X10,X11)),implies(X5,implies(not(X10),not(X4)))),implies(X4,X10)),implies(not(X6),not(implies(X4,X5))))))))),implies(implies(implies(X7,implies(X6,X8)),implies(implies(implies(implies(X9,implies(X10,X11)),implies(X5,implies(not(X10),not(X4)))),implies(X4,X10)),implies(not(X6),not(implies(X4,X5))))),X2))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(esk1_0,esk2_0),implies(implies(esk2_0,esk3_0),implies(esk1_0,esk3_0)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(X1,X2),implies(implies(X2,X3),implies(X1,X3)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL982+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:15:06 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 3843819 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.45  % Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.16/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/0.45  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.45  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.45  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % new_bool_3 with pid 3843826 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.46  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.46  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.46  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/0.46  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/0.46  % Search class: FHUNF-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.46  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/0.46  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04BN with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.46  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.46  
% 0.16/0.46  % Proof found!
% 0.16/0.46  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.16/0.46  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.46  % Parsed axioms                        : 3
% 0.16/0.46  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Initial clauses                      : 3
% 0.16/0.46  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 3
% 0.16/0.46  % Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.16/0.46  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 0.16/0.46  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.16/0.46  % Generated clauses                    : 24
% 0.16/0.46  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 21
% 0.16/0.46  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Paramodulations                      : 24
% 0.16/0.46  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1
% 0.16/0.46  % ...of those cached                   : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/0.46  % Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.16/0.46  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.16/0.46  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.16/0.46  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 5
% 0.16/0.46  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.16/0.46  % ...number of literals in the above   : 13
% 0.16/0.46  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Current number of archived clauses   : 4
% 0.16/0.46  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2
% 0.16/0.46  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.46  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/0.46  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 36
% 0.16/0.46  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.16/0.46  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/0.46  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2059
% 0.16/0.46  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 30
% 0.16/0.46  
% 0.16/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46  % User time                : 0.008 s
% 0.16/0.46  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Total time               : 0.010 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 3636 pages
% 0.16/0.46  
% 0.16/0.46  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.46  % User time                : 0.035 s
% 0.16/0.46  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Total time               : 0.052 s
% 0.16/0.46  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.16/0.46  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------