↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : LCL982+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 20.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  13 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   29 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   22 (  13   ~;   9   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   13 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   98 (  28 sgn  13   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(condensed_detachment,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( is_a_theorem(Y)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(X)
      | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(X,Y)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',condensed_detachment) ).

fof(a5,axiom,
    ! [A,B,C,D,E] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(implies(C,implies(D,E)),implies(B,implies(not(D),not(A)))),implies(A,D)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a5) ).

fof(prove_cn_1,conjecture,
    ! [A,B,C] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_cn_1) ).

fof(prove_cn_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A,B,C] : is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_cn_1]) ).

cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(B)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(A)
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[condensed_detachment]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(implies(C,implies(D,E)),implies(B,implies(not(D),not(A)))),implies(A,D)))),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a5]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ? [A,B,C] : ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_cn_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_cn_1_neg,plain,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2)))),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(A,sK0),skolemize(B,sK1),skolemize(C,sK2)],[nnf_3]) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(sK0,sK1),implies(implies(sK1,sK2),implies(sK0,sK2)))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_cn_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(C,implies(D,E)),implies(B,implies(not(D),not(A)))),implies(A,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_7,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(implies(implies(D,implies(E,F)),implies(V6,implies(not(E),not(V7)))),implies(V7,E)),implies(not(B),not(implies(V7,V6))))),implies(implies(V7,V6),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(V7,V6),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(implies(implies(D,implies(E,F)),implies(V6,implies(not(E),not(V7)))),implies(V7,E)),implies(not(B),not(implies(V7,V6)))))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(implies(C,implies(D,E)),implies(implies(A,F),implies(not(D),not(implies(implies(V6,implies(F,V7)),implies(B,implies(not(F),not(A)))))))),implies(implies(implies(V6,implies(F,V7)),implies(B,implies(not(F),not(A)))),D)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(C,implies(D,E)),implies(B,implies(not(D),not(A)))),implies(A,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(implies(D,E),F),implies(not(B),not(implies(implies(V6,implies(F,V7)),implies(implies(implies(implies(V8,implies(V9,V10)),implies(E,implies(not(V9),not(D)))),implies(D,V9)),implies(not(F),not(implies(D,E))))))))),implies(implies(implies(V6,implies(F,V7)),implies(implies(implies(implies(V8,implies(V9,V10)),implies(E,implies(not(V9),not(D)))),implies(D,V9)),implies(not(F),not(implies(D,E))))),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_7]) ).

cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(C,implies(D,E)),implies(B,implies(not(D),not(A)))),implies(A,D)))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(implies(implies(D,implies(E,F)),implies(implies(V6,V7),implies(not(E),not(implies(implies(V8,implies(V7,V9)),implies(V10,implies(not(V7),not(V6)))))))),implies(implies(implies(V8,implies(V7,V9)),implies(V10,implies(not(V7),not(V6)))),E)),implies(not(B),not(implies(V6,V10))))),implies(implies(V6,V10),B))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_17,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( is_a_theorem(implies(implies(V6,V10),B))
    | ~ is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,implies(B,C)),implies(implies(implies(implies(D,implies(E,F)),implies(implies(V6,V7),implies(not(E),not(implies(implies(V8,implies(V7,V9)),implies(V10,implies(not(V7),not(V6)))))))),implies(implies(implies(V8,implies(V7,V9)),implies(V10,implies(not(V7),not(V6)))),E)),implies(not(B),not(implies(V6,V10)))))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_4,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    is_a_theorem(implies(implies(A,B),implies(implies(B,C),implies(A,C)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_12,c_6]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : LCL982+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/20.39  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/20.39  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/20.39  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/20.39  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/20.39  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/20.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/20.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/20.39  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 23:55:20 UTC 2026
% 0.09/20.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/20.40  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/20.40  % Process 4056099 was started by sandbox2 on n006,
% 0.09/20.40  % Fri Sep 25 23:55:20 2026
% 0.09/20.40  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.14/20.40  
% 0.14/20.40  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/20.41  
% 0.14/20.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/20.41  
% 0.14/20.41  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.14/20.41  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.14/20.41  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.14/20.41  % Maximum clause weight is 82.000.
% 0.14/20.41  % Given clauses 7.
% 0.14/20.41  
% 0.14/20.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------