%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LCL982+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0Atlt23981 true
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Sep 7 01:37:44 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 0.49s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 0.49s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 21 ( 9 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 37 ( 0 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 374 ( 18 ~; 16 |; 0 &; 340 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 22 ( 13 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 6 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 84 ( 0 ^; 84 !; 0 ?; 84 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(not_type,type,
not: $i > $i ).
thf(is_a_theorem_type,type,
is_a_theorem: $i > $o ).
thf(implies_type,type,
implies: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(sk__1_type,type,
sk__1: $i ).
thf(sk__2_type,type,
sk__2: $i ).
thf(prove_cn_1,conjecture,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ B @ C ) @ ( implies @ A @ C ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ B @ C ) @ ( implies @ A @ C ) ) ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[prove_cn_1]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl2,plain,
~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ sk_ @ sk__1 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ sk__1 @ sk__2 ) @ ( implies @ sk_ @ sk__2 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(a5,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ A @ B ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ C @ ( implies @ D @ E ) ) @ ( implies @ B @ ( implies @ ( not @ D ) @ ( not @ A ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ A @ D ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ X3 @ X4 ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X3 ) @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ X3 @ X4 ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X3 ) @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a5]) ).
thf(condensed_detachment,axiom,
! [X: $i,Y: $i] :
( ( is_a_theorem @ Y )
| ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X )
| ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X @ Y ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
| ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[condensed_detachment]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X4 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3_002,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X4 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl1_003,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ X3 @ X4 ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X3 ) @ ( not @ X0 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[a5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl3_004,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X4 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl0_005,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ X0 )
| ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ X1 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[condensed_detachment]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl4,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X4 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl5,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i,X6: $i,X7: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X7 @ ( implies @ X5 @ X6 ) ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X4 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X3 ) ) @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) @ ( implies @ ( not @ X5 ) @ ( not @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) ) ) ) ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) @ X5 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl4]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X5 @ ( implies @ X3 @ X4 ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X3 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X3 ) ) @ X2 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl9,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X1 @ X2 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X2 @ X0 ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl7_006,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X5 @ ( implies @ X3 @ X4 ) ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X3 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) @ ( implies @ X1 @ X3 ) ) @ X2 ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) @ X2 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl3,zip_derived_cl5]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl12,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i,X4: $i,X5: $i] :
( ~ ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X5 @ ( implies @ X0 @ X4 ) ) @ ( implies @ X3 @ ( implies @ ( not @ X0 ) @ ( not @ X1 ) ) ) ) ) )
| ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X1 @ X3 ) @ ( implies @ X2 @ ( implies @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl9,zip_derived_cl7]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl50,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] : ( is_a_theorem @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X0 @ X2 ) @ ( implies @ ( implies @ X2 @ X1 ) @ ( implies @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl1,zip_derived_cl12]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl54,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl2,zip_derived_cl50]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : LCL982+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v9.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.0Atlt23981 true
% 0.12/0.37 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37 % DateTime : Sat Sep 5 16:16:56 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.12/0.37 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.38 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.12/0.38 % Python version: Python 3.12.3
% 0.12/0.38 % Running in FO mode
% 0.45/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.45/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.45/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.49/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.49/0.80 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.49/0.80 % BCE start: 3
% 0.49/0.80 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.80 % PE start: 3
% 0.49/0.80 logic: neq
% 0.49/0.80 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.49/0.80 % done 18 iterations in 0.033s
% 0.49/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.49/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.49/0.80
% 0.49/0.80
% 0.49/0.80 % Terminating...
% 0.50/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 0.50/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------