↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : LDA002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:24:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 0.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   68 (  68 unt;   0 nHn;  52 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   68 (  67 equ;   6 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   20 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(a1,axiom,
    f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1) ).

cnf(clause_2,axiom,
    n2 = f(n1,n1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).

cnf(clause_7,axiom,
    u3 = f(u,n3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).

cnf(clause_4,axiom,
    u = f(n2,n2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).

cnf(clause_6,axiom,
    u2 = f(u,n2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).

cnf(clause_5,axiom,
    u1 = f(u,n1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).

cnf(clause_10,axiom,
    b = f(u1,u3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_10) ).

cnf(clause_3,axiom,
    n3 = f(n2,n1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).

cnf(clause_8,axiom,
    uu = f(u,u),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8) ).

cnf(clause_11,axiom,
    v = f(uu,uu),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_11) ).

cnf(clause_9,axiom,
    a = f(f(n3,n2),u2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).

cnf(prove_equation,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,v) != f(b,v),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    f(X1,f(X2,X3)) = f(f(X1,X2),f(X1,X3)),
    a1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    n2 = f(n1,n1),
    clause_2 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    u3 = f(u,n3),
    clause_7 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    f(f(n1,X1),n2) = f(n1,f(X1,n1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    u = f(n2,n2),
    clause_4 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    u2 = f(u,n2),
    clause_6 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    f(f(u,X1),u3) = f(u,f(X1,n3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    u1 = f(u,n1),
    clause_5 ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    b = f(u1,u3),
    clause_10 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    f(n1,n2) = u,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]),c_0_16]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    n3 = f(n2,n1),
    clause_3 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    f(f(u,X1),u2) = f(u,f(X1,n2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    uu = f(u,u),
    clause_8 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    f(u,f(n1,n3)) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    f(n1,n3) = u2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_21]),c_0_17]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    v = f(uu,uu),
    clause_11 ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    f(uu,u2) = f(u,u2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    f(u,u2) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    f(f(u,X1),uu) = f(u,f(X1,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    f(f(n2,X1),u) = f(n2,f(X1,n2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    f(f(uu,X1),v) = f(uu,f(X1,uu)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    f(uu,u2) = b,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    f(u,f(n2,u)) = f(u2,uu),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    f(n2,u) = uu,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_16]),c_0_24]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    f(u,uu) = v,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_24]),c_0_27]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,axiom,
    a = f(f(n3,n2),u2),
    clause_9 ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    f(n1,f(n1,X1)) = f(n2,f(n1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,v) != f(b,v),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_equation]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    f(uu,f(u2,uu)) = f(b,v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    f(u2,uu) = v,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    f(f(f(n3,n2),X1),a) = f(f(n3,n2),f(X1,u2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    f(u2,u2) = uu,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_17]),c_0_16]),c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    f(n3,u) = uu,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_22]),c_0_21]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    f(n3,f(n2,X1)) = f(n2,f(n1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    f(n1,u) = uu,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_21]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    f(u,f(n2,X1)) = f(n2,f(n2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,v) != f(b,v),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    f(b,v) = f(uu,v),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    f(uu,f(u,X1)) = f(u,f(u,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    f(f(n3,n2),uu) = f(a,a),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_37]),c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    f(f(n3,X1),uu) = f(n3,f(X1,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    f(n3,uu) = f(n2,uu),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_35]),c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    f(n2,uu) = v,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,v) != f(uu,v),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    f(uu,v) = f(u,v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_50,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_57,plain,
    f(f(n3,n2),f(u2,X1)) = f(a,f(f(n3,n2),X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    f(a,a) = v,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_35]),c_0_53]),c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    f(n3,uu) = v,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_53,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,plain,
    f(n1,uu) = f(n2,uu),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,v) != f(u,v),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_55,c_0_56]) ).

cnf(c_0_62,plain,
    f(u,v) = f(n2,v),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_63,plain,
    f(f(n3,n2),v) = f(a,v),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_57,c_0_41]),c_0_51]),c_0_58]) ).

cnf(c_0_64,plain,
    f(f(n3,X1),v) = f(n3,f(X1,uu)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_59]) ).

cnf(c_0_65,plain,
    f(n3,v) = f(n2,v),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_54]),c_0_60]),c_0_54]) ).

cnf(c_0_66,negated_conjecture,
    f(a,v) != f(n2,v),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_61,c_0_62]) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_63,c_0_64]),c_0_54]),c_0_65]),c_0_66]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : LDA002-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:19:51 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.48  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.45/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 244710 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Result found by G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.45/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.45/0.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.45/0.48  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.48  % partial match(1): FUUPF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 151s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % SubtermCWHack with pid 244714 completed with status 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.45/0.48  % Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.45/0.48  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting G----_0031_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_S0Y with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.45/0.48  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.45/0.48  % Search class: FUUPF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.48  % partial match(1): FUUPF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.45/0.48  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.45/0.48  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.45/0.48  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.45/0.48  
% 0.45/0.48  % Proof found!
% 0.45/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.45/0.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.48  % Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 0.45/0.48  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Initial clauses                      : 12
% 0.45/0.48  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 12
% 0.45/0.48  % Processed clauses                    : 241
% 0.45/0.48  % ...of these trivial                  : 13
% 0.45/0.48  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % ...remaining for further processing  : 228
% 0.45/0.48  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Backward-rewritten                   : 54
% 0.45/0.48  % Generated clauses                    : 5789
% 0.45/0.48  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5201
% 0.45/0.48  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Paramodulations                      : 5789
% 0.45/0.48  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Total rewrite steps                  : 4140
% 0.45/0.48  % ...of those cached                   : 3069
% 0.45/0.48  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.45/0.48  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.45/0.48  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.45/0.48  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.45/0.48  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.45/0.48  % Current number of processed clauses  : 174
% 0.45/0.48  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 173
% 0.45/0.48  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.45/0.48  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.45/0.48  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4933
% 0.45/0.48  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4933
% 0.45/0.48  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Current number of archived clauses   : 54
% 0.45/0.48  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 43
% 0.45/0.48  % BW rewrite match successes           : 41
% 0.45/0.48  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.45/0.48  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 123980
% 0.45/0.48  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.45/0.48  
% 0.45/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.48  % User time                : 0.041 s
% 0.45/0.48  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.45/0.48  % Total time               : 0.046 s
% 0.45/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.45/0.48  
% 0.45/0.48  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.45/0.48  % User time                : 0.178 s
% 0.45/0.48  % System time              : 0.033 s
% 0.45/0.48  % Total time               : 0.211 s
% 0.45/0.48  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.45/0.48  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------