%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : LDA003-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C107c6lP8U true
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct 2 04:44:27 PM UTC 2025
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13 % Problem : LDA003-1 : TPTP v9.2.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.C107c6lP8U true
% 0.13/0.36 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.36 % DateTime : Wed Oct 1 16:55:38 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.36 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.20/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.20/0.37 % Running in FO mode
% 0.53/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.53/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.53/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.54/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.54/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.81 % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.81 % BCE start: 7
% 0.56/0.81 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.81 % PE start: 7
% 0.56/0.81 logic: eq
% 0.56/0.81 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.81 % done 73 iterations in 0.045s
% 0.56/0.81 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.81 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.81 thf(left_type, type, left: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(n3_type, type, n3: $i).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(f_type, type, f: $i > $i > $i).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(n1_type, type, n1: $i).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(n2_type, type, n2: $i).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(u_type, type, u: $i).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(prove_equation, conjecture, (left @ n3 @ u)).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (~( left @ n3 @ u )),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_equation])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, (~ (left @ n3 @ u)),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(clause_5, axiom, (( n3 ) = ( f @ n2 @ n1 ))).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((n3) = (f @ n2 @ n1))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_5])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, (((n3) = (f @ n2 @ n1))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_5])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(a1, axiom,
% 0.56/0.81 (( f @ X @ ( f @ Y @ Z ) ) = ( f @ ( f @ X @ Y ) @ ( f @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 0.56/0.81 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.81 ((f @ X0 @ (f @ X1 @ X2)) = (f @ (f @ X0 @ X1) @ (f @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a1])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl25, plain,
% 0.56/0.81 (![X0 : $i]: ((f @ n2 @ (f @ X0 @ n1)) = (f @ (f @ n2 @ X0) @ n3))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl303, plain, (((f @ n2 @ (f @ n1 @ n1)) = (f @ n3 @ n3))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl4, zip_derived_cl25])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(clause_4, axiom, (( n2 ) = ( f @ n1 @ n1 ))).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain, (((n2) = (f @ n1 @ n1))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_4])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(clause_6, axiom, (( u ) = ( f @ n2 @ n2 ))).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, (((u) = (f @ n2 @ n2))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [clause_6])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl305, plain, (((u) = (f @ n3 @ n3))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.81 [zip_derived_cl303, zip_derived_cl3, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(a2, axiom, (left @ X @ ( f @ X @ Y ))).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.56/0.81 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: (left @ X0 @ (f @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [a2])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl310, plain, ( (left @ n3 @ u)),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl305, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.56/0.81 thf(zip_derived_cl330, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.81 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl310])).
% 0.56/0.81
% 0.56/0.81 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.81
% 0.56/0.81
% 0.56/0.81 % Terminating...
% 1.60/0.86 % Runner terminated.
% 1.60/0.88 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------