↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : LDA007-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:09 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 4.66s 2.68s
% Output   : Refutation 5.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :   20
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   41 (  31 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  36 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  186 (  10   ~;  10   |;   0   &; 166   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  16 usr;  13 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   42 (   0   ^;  42   !;   0   ?;  42   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(f_decl,type,
    f: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(t_decl,type,
    t: $i ).

thf(tsk_decl,type,
    tsk: $i ).

thf(tt_ts_decl,type,
    tt_ts: $i ).

thf(tk_decl,type,
    tk: $i ).

thf(less_decl,type,
    less: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(a_decl,type,
    a: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(critical_point_decl,type,
    critical_point: $i > $i ).

thf(k_decl,type,
    k: $i ).

thf(ts_decl,type,
    ts: $i ).

thf(sk_decl,type,
    sk: $i ).

thf(s_decl,type,
    s: $i ).

thf(ttk_decl,type,
    ttk: $i ).

thf(tt_decl,type,
    tt: $i ).

thf(stk_decl,type,
    stk: $i ).

thf(st_decl,type,
    st: $i ).

thf(17,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ f ) @ ( A @ f ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ f ) @ ( B @ ( A @ f ) @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1) ).

thf(56,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ f ) @ ( A @ f ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ f ) @ ( B @ ( A @ f ) @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[17]) ).

thf(15,axiom,
    ( ts
    = ( s @ ( t @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).

thf(52,plain,
    ( ts
    = ( s @ ( t @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[15]) ).

thf(19,axiom,
    ( stk
    = ( k @ ( st @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8) ).

thf(61,plain,
    ( stk
    = ( k @ ( st @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[19]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ a ) @ ( A @ less ) )
      | ( B @ critical_point @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c3) ).

thf(34,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ a ) @ ( A @ less ) )
      | ( B @ critical_point @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(11,axiom,
    ( sk
    = ( k @ ( s @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).

thf(44,plain,
    ( sk
    = ( k @ ( s @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[11]) ).

thf(16,axiom,
    ( tk
    = ( k @ ( t @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).

thf(54,plain,
    ( tk
    = ( k @ ( t @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[16]) ).

thf(18,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ f ) @ a ) )
        = B )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ a ) )
       != B ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2) ).

thf(58,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ ( C @ f ) @ a ) )
        = B )
      | ( ( B @ ( A @ a ) )
       != B ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[18]) ).

thf(7,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ f ) @ critical_point )
      = ( B @ critical_point @ ( A @ a ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2) ).

thf(36,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ f ) @ critical_point )
      = ( B @ critical_point @ ( A @ a ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[7]) ).

thf(10,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ a ) @ ( A @ a ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ a ) @ ( B @ ( A @ f ) @ a ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1a) ).

thf(42,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( C @ ( B @ a ) @ ( A @ a ) )
      = ( C @ ( A @ a ) @ ( B @ ( A @ f ) @ a ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[10]) ).

thf(2,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ less ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b1) ).

thf(24,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ~ ( A @ ( A @ less ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(12,axiom,
    ( ttk
    = ( k @ ( tt @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_10) ).

thf(46,plain,
    ( ttk
    = ( k @ ( tt @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[12]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( C @ a ) @ ( A @ ( C @ a ) @ less ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',b4) ).

thf(29,plain,
    ! [C: $i,B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( C @ a ) @ ( A @ ( C @ a ) @ less ) )
      | ~ ( B @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(8,axiom,
    ( k
    = ( t @ critical_point ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_5) ).

thf(38,plain,
    ( k
    = ( t @ critical_point ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[8]) ).

thf(1,negated_conjecture,
    ( ( tsk @ ( t @ f ) )
   != ( tk @ ( tt_ts @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_equation) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ( ( tsk @ ( t @ f ) )
   != ( tk @ ( tt_ts @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[1]) ).

thf(13,axiom,
    ( tt
    = ( t @ ( t @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).

thf(48,plain,
    ( tt
    = ( t @ ( t @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[13]) ).

thf(20,axiom,
    ( st
    = ( t @ ( s @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).

thf(63,plain,
    ( st
    = ( t @ ( s @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[20]) ).

thf(14,axiom,
    ( tt_ts
    = ( ts @ ( tt @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_4) ).

thf(50,plain,
    ( tt_ts
    = ( ts @ ( tt @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[14]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ a ) )
        = A )
      | ~ ( B @ critical_point @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c2) ).

thf(31,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( ( A @ ( B @ a ) )
        = A )
      | ~ ( B @ critical_point @ ( A @ less ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(9,axiom,
    ( tsk
    = ( k @ ( ts @ f ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).

thf(40,plain,
    ( tsk
    = ( k @ ( ts @ f ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[9]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ a ) @ ( A @ less ) )
      | ( A
        = ( A @ ( B @ a ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c1) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [B: $i,A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ ( B @ a ) @ ( A @ less ) )
      | ( A
        = ( A @ ( B @ a ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(104,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[56,52,61,34,44,54,58,36,42,24,46,29,38,21,48,63,50,31,40,26]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : LDA007-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.26/0.51  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.26/0.51  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.26/0.51  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.26/0.51  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.26/0.51  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.26/0.51  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.26/0.51  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.26/0.51  % DateTime : Fri Sep 25 23:53:55 UTC 2026
% 0.26/0.51  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.26/0.51  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.17/1.09  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.60/1.39  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (290ms). 
% 1.81/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.41/1.86  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.41/1.87  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.63/1.96  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 19 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.63/2.02  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 19 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.93/2.05  % [INFO] 	 Problem is propositional (TPTP CNF). 
% 2.93/2.05  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.93/2.06  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 4.66/2.67  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 4.66/2.67  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 4.66/2.67  % Time passed: 2027ms (effective reasoning time: 1255ms)
% 4.66/2.68  % Axioms used in derivation (19): clause_2, clause_1, clause_8, b4, clause_9, clause_6, a1, clause_3, a2, c3, clause_5, a1a, c2, b1, c1, clause_7, clause_10, clause_4, d2
% 4.66/2.68  % No. of inferences in proof: 41
% 4.66/2.68  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2027 ms resp. 1255 ms w/o parsing
% 5.18/2.72  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.18/2.72  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------