↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MED001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 19:22:36 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.04s 2.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.04s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   14
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   42 (  10 unt;  28 nHn;  14 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  145 (   0 equ;  52 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   8 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   53 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_41,plain,
    ( bcapacityex(X1)
    | bsecretioni(X2)
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | ~ drugsu(esk14_1(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_41) ).

cnf(i_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    ( drugsu(X1)
    | gt(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_49) ).

cnf(i_0_53,plain,
    ( ~ bcapacityex(X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_53) ).

cnf(i_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    bcapacitysn(n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_47) ).

cnf(i_0_42,plain,
    ( bcapacityex(X1)
    | bsecretioni(X2)
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X1,esk14_1(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_42) ).

cnf(i_0_34,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | gt(X2,esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ bsecretioni(esk10_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_34) ).

cnf(i_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    qilt27(n0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_46) ).

cnf(i_0_33,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ conditionhyper(esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ bsecretioni(esk10_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_33) ).

cnf(i_0_36,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | gt(X2,esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,esk10_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_36) ).

cnf(i_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( conditionhyper(X1)
    | ~ gt(n0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_35,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ conditionhyper(esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ gt(X2,esk10_1(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_35) ).

cnf(i_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ conditionnormo(esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_44) ).

cnf(i_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ gt(n0,esk15_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-uc5h9kdd/input.p',i_0_45) ).

cnf(c_0_67,plain,
    ( bcapacityex(X1)
    | bsecretioni(X2)
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | ~ drugsu(esk14_1(X1)) ),
    i_0_41 ).

cnf(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( drugsu(X1)
    | gt(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_49 ).

cnf(c_0_69,plain,
    ( ~ bcapacityex(X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X1) ),
    i_0_53 ).

cnf(c_0_70,negated_conjecture,
    bcapacitysn(n0),
    i_0_47 ).

cnf(c_0_71,plain,
    ( bcapacityex(X1)
    | bsecretioni(X2)
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | ~ gt(X1,esk14_1(X1)) ),
    i_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_72,negated_conjecture,
    ( bsecretioni(X1)
    | bcapacityex(X2)
    | gt(n0,esk14_1(X2))
    | gt(X2,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_67,c_0_68]) ).

cnf(c_0_73,negated_conjecture,
    ~ bcapacityex(n0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]) ).

cnf(c_0_74,plain,
    ( bsecretioni(X1)
    | bsecretioni(X2)
    | gt(n0,X1)
    | gt(n0,X2) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_71,c_0_72]),c_0_73]) ).

cnf(c_0_75,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | gt(X2,esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ bsecretioni(esk10_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_76,plain,
    ( bsecretioni(X1)
    | gt(n0,X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_74]) ).

cnf(c_0_77,plain,
    ( gt(n0,esk10_1(X1))
    | gt(X1,esk11_1(X1))
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_75,c_0_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_78,negated_conjecture,
    qilt27(n0),
    i_0_46 ).

cnf(c_0_79,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ conditionhyper(esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ bsecretioni(esk10_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_80,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | gt(X2,esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ gt(X2,esk10_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_36 ).

cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
    ( gt(n0,esk11_1(n0))
    | gt(n0,esk10_1(n0))
    | gt(n0,X1)
    | conditionnormo(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]),c_0_70])]) ).

cnf(c_0_82,plain,
    ( gt(n0,esk10_1(X1))
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X2)
    | ~ conditionhyper(esk11_1(X1))
    | ~ qilt27(X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_76]) ).

cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
    ( conditionhyper(X1)
    | ~ gt(n0,X1) ),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_84,plain,
    ( gt(n0,esk11_1(n0))
    | gt(n0,X1)
    | gt(n0,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X1)
    | conditionnormo(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_80,c_0_81]),c_0_78]),c_0_70])]) ).

cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
    ( gt(n0,esk10_1(X1))
    | gt(X1,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X2)
    | ~ gt(n0,esk11_1(X1))
    | ~ qilt27(X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_82,c_0_83]) ).

cnf(c_0_86,plain,
    ( gt(n0,esk11_1(n0))
    | gt(n0,X1)
    | conditionnormo(X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_84]) ).

cnf(c_0_87,negated_conjecture,
    ( gt(n0,esk10_1(n0))
    | gt(n0,X1)
    | gt(n0,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X1)
    | conditionnormo(X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_85,c_0_86]),c_0_78]),c_0_70])]) ).

cnf(c_0_88,plain,
    ( conditionnormo(X1)
    | gt(X2,X1)
    | ~ bcapacitysn(X2)
    | ~ qilt27(X2)
    | ~ conditionhyper(esk11_1(X2))
    | ~ gt(X2,esk10_1(X2)) ),
    i_0_35 ).

cnf(c_0_89,negated_conjecture,
    ( gt(n0,esk10_1(n0))
    | gt(n0,X1)
    | conditionnormo(X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_87]) ).

cnf(c_0_90,plain,
    ( gt(n0,X1)
    | gt(n0,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X1)
    | conditionnormo(X2)
    | ~ conditionhyper(esk11_1(n0)) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_88,c_0_89]),c_0_78]),c_0_70])]) ).

cnf(c_0_91,negated_conjecture,
    ( gt(n0,X1)
    | gt(n0,X2)
    | conditionnormo(X1)
    | conditionnormo(X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_90,c_0_83]),c_0_86]) ).

cnf(c_0_92,negated_conjecture,
    ~ conditionnormo(esk15_0),
    i_0_44 ).

cnf(c_0_93,negated_conjecture,
    ( gt(n0,X1)
    | conditionnormo(X1) ),
    inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_91]) ).

cnf(c_0_94,negated_conjecture,
    ~ gt(n0,esk15_0),
    i_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_95,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_92,c_0_93]),c_0_94]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : MED001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.2.0.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime : Tue Jul  5 01:52:23 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.44  # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.18/0.45  # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   0.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   1.p
% 0.18/0.45  # Filter: axfilter_auto   2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto   2.p
% 7.04/2.30  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S04BN:
% 7.04/2.30  # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.04/2.30  # Preprocessing time       : 0.010 s
% 7.04/2.30  
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof found!
% 7.04/2.30  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.04/2.30  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object total steps             : 42
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object clause steps            : 29
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object formula steps           : 13
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object conjectures             : 21
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 15
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 6
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 13
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 13
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object generating inferences   : 16
% 7.04/2.30  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 14
% 7.04/2.30  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.04/2.30  # Parsed axioms                        : 57
% 7.04/2.30  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Initial clauses                      : 57
% 7.04/2.30  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 57
% 7.04/2.30  # Processed clauses                    : 111
% 7.04/2.30  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 7.04/2.30  # ...remaining for further processing  : 100
% 7.04/2.30  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Backward-subsumed                    : 16
% 7.04/2.30  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Generated clauses                    : 185
% 7.04/2.30  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 155
% 7.04/2.30  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 5
% 7.04/2.30  # Paramodulations                      : 135
% 7.04/2.30  # Factorizations                       : 50
% 7.04/2.30  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Propositional unsat check successes  : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Current number of processed clauses  : 84
% 7.04/2.30  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 7.04/2.30  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.04/2.30  #    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 7.04/2.30  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 76
% 7.04/2.30  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66
% 7.04/2.30  # ...number of literals in the above   : 437
% 7.04/2.30  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Current number of archived clauses   : 16
% 7.04/2.30  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2677
% 7.04/2.30  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 218
% 7.04/2.30  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 31
% 7.04/2.30  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 81
% 7.04/2.30  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1
% 7.04/2.30  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 7.04/2.30  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 7.04/2.30  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 5857
% 7.04/2.30  
% 7.04/2.30  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.04/2.30  # User time                : 0.015 s
% 7.04/2.30  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 7.04/2.30  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 7.04/2.30  # ...preprocessing         : 0.010 s
% 7.04/2.30  # ...main loop             : 0.006 s
% 7.04/2.30  # Maximum resident set size: 7136 pages
% 7.04/2.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------