↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1.1
% Problem  : MGT002+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.07s 0.40s
% Output   : Proof 0.07s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   45 (   8 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  213 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  257 (  89   ~;  85   |;  65   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   18 (   7 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  169 (   3 sgn 100   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% FILE RECORD
fof(mp4,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X5] :
      ( reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
     => ( reorganization_free(X1,X4,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X5,X5) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp4) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp4_elimTB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
     => ( reorganization_free(X1,X2,X2)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X3,X3) ) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[mp4])]) ).

% FOF INTRODUCE RENAMING
fof(ren1_defn,definition,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ren1(X1,X2,X3)
     => ( reorganization_free(X1,X2,X2)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X3,X3) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[ren1])],[mp4_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ ren1(X1,X2,X3)
      | ( reorganization_free(X1,X2,X2)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X3,X3) ) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[ren1_defn]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_3,plain,
    ( ~ ren1(X0,X1,X2)
    | reorganization_free(X0,X2,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FOF RENAMING INFERENCE
fof(mp4_renObv,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
     => ren1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(esa)],[mp4_elimTB,ren1_defn]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp4_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
      | ren1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[mp4_renObv]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X2)
    | ren1(X0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[mp4_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( ~ ren1(X0,X1,X2)
    | reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X2)
    | reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2,c_4]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(a3_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X6,X4,X5,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X4)
        & organization(X6,X5)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X6,X5,X5)
        & reproducibility(X1,X7,X4)
        & reproducibility(X6,X8,X5)
        & inertia(X1,X9,X4)
        & inertia(X6,X10,X5) )
     => ( greater(X8,X7)
      <=> greater(X10,X9) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a3_FOL) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a3_FOL_elimTB,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X3)
        & organization(X2,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X3,X3)
        & reorganization_free(X2,X4,X4)
        & reproducibility(X1,X5,X3)
        & reproducibility(X2,X6,X4)
        & inertia(X1,X7,X3)
        & inertia(X2,X8,X4) )
     => ( greater(X6,X5)
      <=> greater(X8,X7) ) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[a3_FOL])]) ).

% FOF INTRODUCE RENAMING
fof(ren2_defn,definition,
    ! [X6,X5,X8,X7] :
      ( ren2(X6,X5,X8,X7)
    <=> ( greater(X6,X5)
      <=> greater(X8,X7) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[ren2])],[a3_FOL_elimTB]) ).

% FOF RENAMING INFERENCE
fof(a3_FOL_renObv,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X3)
        & organization(X2,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X3,X3)
        & reorganization_free(X2,X4,X4)
        & reproducibility(X1,X5,X3)
        & reproducibility(X2,X6,X4)
        & inertia(X1,X7,X3)
        & inertia(X2,X8,X4) )
     => ren2(X6,X5,X8,X7) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(esa)],[a3_FOL_elimTB,ren2_defn]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a3_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X3)
      | ~ organization(X2,X4)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X3,X3)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X2,X4,X4)
      | ~ reproducibility(X1,X5,X3)
      | ~ reproducibility(X2,X6,X4)
      | ~ inertia(X1,X7,X3)
      | ~ inertia(X2,X8,X4)
      | ren2(X6,X5,X8,X7) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[a3_FOL_renObv]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X2,X3)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X2,X3,X3)
    | ~ reproducibility(X0,X4,X1)
    | ~ reproducibility(X2,X5,X3)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X6,X1)
    | ~ inertia(X2,X7,X3)
    | ren2(X5,X4,X7,X6) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[a3_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(ren2_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,plain,
    ( ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
        ( ~ ren2(X1,X2,X3,X4)
        | ( ( ~ greater(X1,X2)
            | greater(X3,X4) )
          & ( ~ greater(X3,X4)
            | greater(X1,X2) ) ) )
    & ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
        ( ( ( ~ greater(X5,X6)
            | ~ greater(X7,X8) )
          & ( greater(X5,X6)
            | greater(X7,X8) ) )
        | ren2(X5,X6,X7,X8) ) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[ren2_defn]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_5,plain,
    ( ~ ren2(X0,X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ greater(X0,X1)
    | greater(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren2_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X2,X3)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X2,X3,X3)
    | ~ reproducibility(X0,X4,X1)
    | ~ reproducibility(X2,X5,X3)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X6,X1)
    | ~ inertia(X2,X7,X3)
    | ~ greater(X5,X4)
    | greater(X7,X6) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_9,c_5]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(a4_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X7,X8,X4,X5] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X4)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & reproducibility(X1,X7,X4)
        & reproducibility(X1,X8,X5)
        & greater(X5,X4) )
     => greater(X8,X7) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a4_FOL) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a4_FOL_elimTB,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X4)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & reproducibility(X1,X2,X4)
        & reproducibility(X1,X3,X5)
        & greater(X5,X4) )
     => greater(X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[a4_FOL])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a4_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ! [X4,X5] :
          ( ~ organization(X1,X4)
          | ~ organization(X1,X5)
          | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
          | ~ reproducibility(X1,X2,X4)
          | ~ reproducibility(X1,X3,X5)
          | ~ greater(X5,X4) )
      | greater(X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[a4_FOL_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ reproducibility(X0,X3,X1)
    | ~ reproducibility(X0,X4,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | greater(X4,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[a4_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(mp3,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] : reproducibility(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp3) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp3_elimTB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] : reproducibility(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[mp3])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp3_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
      | ? [X3] : reproducibility(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[mp3_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(mp3_skol,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
      | reproducibility(X1,skf1(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skf1]),skolemize(X3,skf1(X1,X2))],[mp3_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | reproducibility(X0,skf1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[mp3_skol])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ reproducibility(X0,X3,X1)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | greater(skf1(X0,X2),X3) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_1]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_21,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X2,X3,X3)
    | ~ reproducibility(X0,X4,X1)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X5,X1)
    | ~ inertia(X2,X6,X3)
    | ~ organization(X2,X7)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X2,X7,X3)
    | ~ reproducibility(X2,X4,X7)
    | ~ greater(X3,X7)
    | ~ organization(X2,X3)
    | greater(X6,X5) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_18,c_20,c_1]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_22,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X2,X2)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X3,X1)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | greater(X4,X3) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_21,c_1]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X0,X1,X1)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X2,X3)
    | ~ inertia(X0,X4,X1)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X0,X3,X1)
    | ~ greater(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X3)
    | greater(X4,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_22]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(t2_FOL,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X9,X10,X4,X5] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X4)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & inertia(X1,X9,X4)
        & inertia(X1,X10,X5)
        & greater(X5,X4) )
     => greater(X10,X9) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t2_FOL) ).

% NEGATING CONJECTURE
fof(t2_FOL_nc,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X9,X10,X4,X5] :
        ( ( organization(X1,X4)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
          & inertia(X1,X9,X4)
          & inertia(X1,X10,X5)
          & greater(X5,X4) )
       => greater(X10,X9) ),
    inference(negating_conjecture,[status(cth)],[t2_FOL]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(t2_FOL_nc_elimTB,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
        ( ( organization(X1,X4)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
          & inertia(X1,X2,X4)
          & inertia(X1,X3,X5)
          & greater(X5,X4) )
       => greater(X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(t2_FOL_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ? [X4,X5] :
          ( organization(X1,X4)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
          & inertia(X1,X2,X4)
          & inertia(X1,X3,X5)
          & greater(X5,X4) )
      & ~ greater(X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(t2_FOL_nc_skol,negated_conjecture,
    ( organization(skc2,skc5)
    & organization(skc2,skc6)
    & reorganization_free(skc2,skc5,skc6)
    & inertia(skc2,skc3,skc5)
    & inertia(skc2,skc4,skc6)
    & greater(skc6,skc5)
    & ~ greater(skc4,skc3) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skc2,skc3,skc4,skc5,skc6]),skolemize(X1,skc2),skolemize(X2,skc3),skolemize(X3,skc4),skolemize(X4,skc5),skolemize(X5,skc6)],[t2_FOL_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_13,plain,
    reorganization_free(skc2,skc5,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_15,plain,
    inertia(skc2,skc4,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_14,plain,
    inertia(skc2,skc3,skc5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_17,plain,
    ~ greater(skc4,skc3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_12,plain,
    organization(skc2,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_11,plain,
    organization(skc2,skc5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_16,plain,
    greater(skc6,skc5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_24,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_4,c_23,c_13,c_15,c_14,c_17,c_12,c_11,c_16]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT002+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:27:54 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.07/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  % Input Clauses:
% 0.07/0.39  % 1:2:2:INP:TopTop: organization(x0,x1) -> reproducibility(x0,skf1(x0,x1),x1)
% 0.07/0.39  % 2:2:3:INP:TopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2) -> reorganization_free(x0,x1,x1)
% 0.07/0.39  % 3:2:3:INP:TopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2) -> reorganization_free(x0,x2,x2)
% 0.07/0.39  % 4:2:3:INP:TopTopTop: reorganization_free(x0,x1,x2) -> ren1(x0,x1,x2)
% 0.07/0.39  % 5:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3),greater(x0,x1) -> greater(x2,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 6:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3),greater(x2,x3) -> greater(x0,x1)
% 0.07/0.39  % 7:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: greater(x0,x1),greater(x2,x3) -> ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 8:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop:  -> greater(x0,x1),greater(x2,x3),ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 9:9:8:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x2,x3),reorganization_free(x0,x1,x1),reorganization_free(x2,x3,x3),reproducibility(x0,x4,x1),reproducibility(x2,x5,x3),inertia(x0,x6,x1),inertia(x2,x7,x3) -> ren2(x5,x4,x7,x6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 10:7:5:INP:TopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x0,x2),reorganization_free(x0,x1,x2),reproducibility(x0,x3,x1),reproducibility(x0,x4,x2),greater(x2,x1) -> greater(x4,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 11:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc2,skc5)
% 0.07/0.39  % 12:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc2,skc6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 13:1:0:INP::  -> reorganization_free(skc2,skc5,skc6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 14:1:0:INP::  -> inertia(skc2,skc3,skc5)
% 0.07/0.39  % 15:1:0:INP::  -> inertia(skc2,skc4,skc6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 16:1:0:INP::  -> greater(skc6,skc5)
% 0.07/0.39  % 17:1:0:INP:: greater(skc4,skc3) -> 
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  % Predicates: organization reproducibility reorganization_free inertia greater ren1 ren2 
% 0.07/0.39  % Fol Constants: skc2 skc3 skc4 skc5 skc6 
% 0.07/0.39  % Fol Functions: skf1 
% 0.07/0.39  % Problem Properties:
% 0.07/0.39  % This is a full first-order problem without equality. The Problem is non-linear. 
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  % Reduced Input Axiom Clauses:
% 0.07/0.39  % 1:2:2:INP:TopTop: organization(x0,x1) -> reproducibility(x0,skf1(x0,x1),x1)
% 0.07/0.39  % 2:2:3:INP:TopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2) -> reorganization_free(x0,x1,x1)
% 0.07/0.39  % 3:2:3:INP:TopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2) -> reorganization_free(x0,x2,x2)
% 0.07/0.39  % 4:2:3:INP:TopTopTop: reorganization_free(x0,x1,x2) -> ren1(x0,x1,x2)
% 0.07/0.39  % 5:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3),greater(x0,x1) -> greater(x2,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 6:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3),greater(x2,x3) -> greater(x0,x1)
% 0.07/0.39  % 7:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: greater(x0,x1),greater(x2,x3) -> ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 8:3:4:INP:TopTopTopTop:  -> greater(x0,x1),greater(x2,x3),ren2(x0,x1,x2,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  % Reduced Input Conjecture Clauses:
% 0.07/0.39  % 9:9:8:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x2,x3),reorganization_free(x0,x1,x1),reorganization_free(x2,x3,x3),reproducibility(x0,x4,x1),reproducibility(x2,x5,x3),inertia(x0,x6,x1),inertia(x2,x7,x3) -> ren2(x5,x4,x7,x6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 10:7:5:INP:TopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x0,x2),reorganization_free(x0,x1,x2),reproducibility(x0,x3,x1),reproducibility(x0,x4,x2),greater(x2,x1) -> greater(x4,x3)
% 0.07/0.39  % 11:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc2,skc5)
% 0.07/0.39  % 12:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc2,skc6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 13:1:0:INP::  -> reorganization_free(skc2,skc5,skc6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 14:1:0:INP::  -> inertia(skc2,skc3,skc5)
% 0.07/0.39  % 15:1:0:INP::  -> inertia(skc2,skc4,skc6)
% 0.07/0.39  % 16:1:0:INP::  -> greater(skc6,skc5)
% 0.07/0.39  % 17:1:0:INP:: greater(skc4,skc3) -> 
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  
% 0.07/0.39  % === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 42 atoms initially. Used heuristic: lmodel_grow ===
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.07/0.40  % Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  % SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.07/0.40  % Number of learned clauses: 5
% 0.07/0.40  % Number of propagations: 127
% 0.07/0.40  % Number of decisions: 54
% 0.07/0.40  % Number of resolutions: 15
% 0.07/0.40  % Number of condensations: 0
% 0.07/0.40  % Number of sub resolutions: 1
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  % Solver is done. Empty clause found
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.07/0.40  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.07/0.40  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  % Needed:       0:00:00.05
% 0.07/0.40  
% 0.07/0.40  % ###
% 0.07/0.40  % ### Pagesize: 8192
% 0.07/0.40  % ### Marksize: 0
% 0.07/0.40  % ### Memory demanded:  1482 KBytes
% 0.07/0.40  % ### Memory freed:     1482 KBytes
% 0.07/0.40  % ### Memory remaining: 0 Bytes
% 0.07/0.40  % ### Pages allocated:  292 Pages
% 0.07/0.40  % ###
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------