%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT003-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:14 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 58.19s 58.40s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.01 % Problem : MGT003-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.01 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.02/0.29 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.02/0.29 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.02/0.29 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.02/0.29 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.02/0.29 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.02/0.29 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.02/0.29 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.02/0.29 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:35:11 UTC 2026 % 0.02/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.08/0.38 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.07/58.39 %------------------------------------------- % 58.07/58.39 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.07/58.39 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.07/58.39 % Transform :cnf % 58.07/58.39 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.07/58.39 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.07/58.39 % 58.07/58.39 % Result :Theorem 58.005470s % 58.07/58.39 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.005470s % 58.07/58.39 %------------------------------------------- % 58.07/58.40 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.07/58.40 % File : MGT003-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 58.07/58.40 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.07/58.40 % Problem : Organizational death rates decrease with age. % 58.07/58.40 % Version : [PB+94] axioms. % 58.19/58.40 % English : % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.19/58.40 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.19/58.40 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.19/58.40 % Source : [TPTP] % 58.19/58.40 % Names : % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 58.19/58.40 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0 % 58.19/58.40 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 12 RR) % 58.19/58.40 % Number of literals : 30 ( 0 equ; 19 neg) % 58.19/58.40 % Maximal clause size : 10 ( 2 avg) % 58.19/58.40 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 58.19/58.40 % Number of predicates : 5 ( 5 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.19/58.40 % Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty) % 58.19/58.40 % Number of variables : 21 ( 2 sgn) % 58.19/58.40 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT003+1.p % 58.19/58.40 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.40 cnf(mp4_1,axiom, % 58.19/58.40 ( ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C) % 58.19/58.40 | reorganization_free(A,B,B) ) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(mp4_2,axiom, % 58.19/58.40 ( ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C) % 58.19/58.40 | reorganization_free(A,C,C) ) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(mp5_3,axiom, % 58.19/58.40 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.19/58.40 | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t1_FOL_4,hypothesis, % 58.19/58.40 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ inertia(A,E,B) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ inertia(C,F,D) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ survival_chance(A,G,B) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ survival_chance(C,H,D) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ greater(F,E) % 58.19/58.40 | greater(H,G) ) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t2_FOL_5,hypothesis, % 58.19/58.40 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ organization(A,C) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ inertia(A,D,B) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ inertia(A,E,C) % 58.19/58.40 | ~ greater(C,B) % 58.19/58.40 | greater(E,D) ) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_6,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 organization(sk2,sk5) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_7,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 organization(sk2,sk6) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_8,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 reorganization_free(sk2,sk5,sk6) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_9,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 survival_chance(sk2,sk3,sk5) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_10,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 survival_chance(sk2,sk4,sk6) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_11,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 greater(sk6,sk5) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 cnf(t3_FOL_12,negated_conjecture, % 58.19/58.40 ~ greater(sk4,sk3) ). % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.40 %------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.40 % Proof found % 58.19/58.40 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.19/58.40 % SZS output start Proof % 58.19/58.40 %ClaNum:12(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.19/58.40 %VarNum:61(SingletonVarNum:21) % 58.19/58.40 %MaxLitNum:10 % 58.19/58.40 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.19/58.40 %SharedTerms:12 % 58.19/58.40 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 % 58.19/58.40 %singleGoalClaCount:7 % 58.19/58.40 [1]P1(a1,a3) % 58.19/58.40 [2]P1(a1,a6) % 58.19/58.40 [3]P2(a6,a3) % 58.19/58.40 [4]P4(a1,a3,a6) % 58.19/58.40 [5]P5(a1,a4,a3) % 58.19/58.40 [6]P5(a1,a5,a6) % 58.19/58.40 [7]~P2(a5,a4) % 58.19/58.40 [8]~P1(x81,x82)+P3(x81,f2(x82,x81),x82) % 58.19/58.40 [9]P4(x91,x92,x92)+~P4(x91,x93,x92) % 58.19/58.40 [10]P4(x101,x102,x102)+~P4(x101,x102,x103) % 58.19/58.40 [11]~P2(x114,x115)+~P4(x113,x115,x114)+~P3(x113,x111,x114)+~P3(x113,x112,x115)+P2(x111,x112)+~P1(x113,x114)+~P1(x113,x115) % 58.19/58.40 [12]~P4(x123,x124,x124)+~P4(x125,x126,x126)+~P3(x123,x127,x124)+~P3(x125,x128,x126)+~P5(x123,x121,x124)+~P5(x125,x122,x126)+P2(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x124)+~P1(x125,x126)+~P2(x127,x128) % 58.19/58.40 %EqnAxiom % 58.19/58.40 % 58.19/58.40 %------------------------------------------- % 58.29/58.53 cnf(313511,plain, % 58.29/58.53 (P4(a1,a6,a6)), % 58.29/58.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,9])). % 58.29/58.53 cnf(313513,plain, % 58.29/58.53 (P4(a1,a3,a3)), % 58.29/58.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[4,9,10])). % 58.29/58.53 cnf(313515,plain, % 58.29/58.53 (P3(a1,f2(a3,a1),a3)), % 58.29/58.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,4,9,10,8])). % 58.29/58.53 cnf(313519,plain, % 58.29/58.53 (P3(a1,f2(a6,a1),a6)), % 58.29/58.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,8])). % 58.29/58.53 cnf(313521,plain, % 58.29/58.53 (P2(f2(a6,a1),f2(a3,a1))), % 58.29/58.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,313515,4,2,3,8,11])). % 58.29/58.53 cnf(313543,plain, % 58.29/58.53 ($false), % 58.29/58.53 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,313521,313511,313519,313513,313515,5,2,6,7,12]), % 58.29/58.53 ['proof']). % 58.41/58.60 % SZS output end Proof % 58.41/58.60 % Total time :58.005470s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------