↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MGT004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:31 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 5.25s 3.13s
% Output   : Refutation 5.67s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   12 (   1 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   82 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  279 (  12   ~;   0   |;  59   &; 197   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (  15 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   6 usr;   1 con; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   0   ^;  67   !;   4   ?;  71   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(organization_decl,type,
    organization: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(reorganization_decl,type,
    reorganization: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(survival_chance_decl,type,
    survival_chance: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(greater_decl,type,
    greater: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(reliability_decl,type,
    reliability: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(accountability_decl,type,
    accountability: $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ organization ) )
     => ? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ accountability ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp2) ).

thf(21,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ organization ) )
     => ? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ accountability ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( G @ ( E @ greater ) )
        & ( D @ ( E @ greater ) )
        & ~ ( D @ ( F @ greater ) )
        & ( E @ ( C @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
        & ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
        & ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ reorganization ) ) )
        & ( E @ ( A @ organization ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
     => ( C @ ( B @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t4_FOL) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i] :
        ( ( ~ ( G @ ( E @ greater ) )
          & ( D @ ( E @ greater ) )
          & ~ ( D @ ( F @ greater ) )
          & ( E @ ( C @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
          & ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
          & ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ reorganization ) ) )
          & ( E @ ( A @ organization ) )
          & ( D @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(7,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i] :
        ( ( ~ ( G @ ( E @ greater ) )
          & ( D @ ( E @ greater ) )
          & ~ ( D @ ( F @ greater ) )
          & ( E @ ( C @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
          & ( D @ ( B @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
          & ( G @ ( F @ ( A @ reorganization ) ) )
          & ( E @ ( A @ organization ) )
          & ( D @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
       => ( C @ ( B @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ organization ) )
     => ? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ reliability ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp1) ).

thf(19,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( B @ ( A @ organization ) )
     => ? [C: $i] : ( B @ ( C @ ( A @ reliability ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(6,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i,H: $i,I: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( I @ ( G @ greater ) )
        & ( F @ ( G @ greater ) )
        & ~ ( F @ ( H @ greater ) )
        & ( G @ ( E @ ( A @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( F @ ( D @ ( A @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( G @ ( C @ ( A @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( F @ ( B @ ( A @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( H @ ( A @ reorganization ) ) )
        & ( G @ ( A @ organization ) )
        & ( F @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
     => ( ( E @ ( D @ greater ) )
        & ( C @ ( B @ greater ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a6_FOL) ).

thf(26,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i,H: $i,I: $i] :
      ( ( ~ ( I @ ( G @ greater ) )
        & ( F @ ( G @ greater ) )
        & ~ ( F @ ( H @ greater ) )
        & ( G @ ( E @ ( A @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( F @ ( D @ ( A @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( G @ ( C @ ( A @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( F @ ( B @ ( A @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( H @ ( A @ reorganization ) ) )
        & ( G @ ( A @ organization ) )
        & ( F @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
     => ( ( E @ ( D @ greater ) )
        & ( C @ ( B @ greater ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[6]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i,H: $i,I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( ( ( E @ ( F @ greater ) )
        & ( C @ ( D @ greater ) )
        & ( J @ ( H @ ( B @ survival_chance ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( G @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
        & ( J @ ( F @ ( B @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( E @ ( A @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( J @ ( D @ ( B @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( C @ ( A @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( J @ ( B @ organization ) )
        & ( I @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
     => ( G @ ( H @ greater ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a1_FOL) ).

thf(23,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i,E: $i,F: $i,G: $i,H: $i,I: $i,J: $i] :
      ( ( ( E @ ( F @ greater ) )
        & ( C @ ( D @ greater ) )
        & ( J @ ( H @ ( B @ survival_chance ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( G @ ( A @ survival_chance ) ) )
        & ( J @ ( F @ ( B @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( E @ ( A @ accountability ) ) )
        & ( J @ ( D @ ( B @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( I @ ( C @ ( A @ reliability ) ) )
        & ( J @ ( B @ organization ) )
        & ( I @ ( A @ organization ) ) )
     => ( G @ ( H @ greater ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[21,7,19,26,23]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : MGT004+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.23/0.57  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.23/0.57  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.23/0.57  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.23/0.57  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.23/0.57  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.23/0.57  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.23/0.57  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.23/0.57  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:05:57 UTC 2026
% 0.23/0.57  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/0.57  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.41/1.48  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.91/1.78  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (294ms). 
% 2.15/1.80  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 2.79/2.26  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 2.79/2.27  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 3.03/2.37  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 4 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 3.29/2.41  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 4 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 3.29/2.44  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 3.29/2.45  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 3.29/2.45  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 5.25/3.12  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 5.25/3.12  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 5.25/3.12  % Time passed: 2344ms (effective reasoning time: 1308ms)
% 5.25/3.12  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 5.25/3.12  % Axioms used in derivation (4): mp2, mp1, a6_FOL, a1_FOL
% 5.25/3.12  % No. of inferences in proof: 12
% 5.25/3.13  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2344 ms resp. 1308 ms w/o parsing
% 5.67/3.17  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.67/3.17  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------