↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1.1
% Problem  : MGT004+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:03 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.35s 0.60s
% Output   : Proof 0.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   43 (  10 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  254 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   23 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  330 ( 119   ~; 112   |;  86   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  13  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   23 (   9 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  209 (   8 sgn 111   !;  13   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% FILE RECORD
fof(a6_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X6,X7,X8,X9,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X12)
        & organization(X1,X13)
        & reorganization(X1,X14,X15)
        & reliability(X1,X6,X12)
        & reliability(X1,X7,X13)
        & accountability(X1,X8,X12)
        & accountability(X1,X9,X13)
        & ~ greater(X14,X12)
        & greater(X13,X12)
        & ~ greater(X13,X15) )
     => ( greater(X6,X7)
        & greater(X8,X9) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a6_FOL) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a6_FOL_elimTB,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X6)
        & organization(X1,X7)
        & reorganization(X1,X8,X9)
        & reliability(X1,X2,X6)
        & reliability(X1,X3,X7)
        & accountability(X1,X4,X6)
        & accountability(X1,X5,X7)
        & ~ greater(X8,X6)
        & greater(X7,X6)
        & ~ greater(X7,X9) )
     => ( greater(X2,X3)
        & greater(X4,X5) ) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[a6_FOL])]) ).

% FOF INTRODUCE RENAMING
fof(ren1_defn,definition,
    ! [X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ren1(X2,X3,X4,X5)
     => ( greater(X2,X3)
        & greater(X4,X5) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[ren1])],[a6_FOL_elimTB]) ).

% FOF RENAMING INFERENCE
fof(a6_FOL_renObv,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X6)
        & organization(X1,X7)
        & reorganization(X1,X8,X9)
        & reliability(X1,X2,X6)
        & reliability(X1,X3,X7)
        & accountability(X1,X4,X6)
        & accountability(X1,X5,X7)
        & ~ greater(X8,X6)
        & greater(X7,X6)
        & ~ greater(X7,X9) )
     => ren1(X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(esa)],[a6_FOL_elimTB,ren1_defn]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a6_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5] :
      ( ! [X6,X7,X8,X9] :
          ( ~ organization(X1,X6)
          | ~ organization(X1,X7)
          | ~ reorganization(X1,X8,X9)
          | ~ reliability(X1,X2,X6)
          | ~ reliability(X1,X3,X7)
          | ~ accountability(X1,X4,X6)
          | ~ accountability(X1,X5,X7)
          | greater(X8,X6)
          | ~ greater(X7,X6)
          | greater(X7,X9) )
      | ren1(X2,X3,X4,X5) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[a6_FOL_renObv]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_6,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | ~ reorganization(X0,X3,X4)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X5,X1)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X6,X2)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X7,X1)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X8,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | greater(X3,X1)
    | greater(X2,X4)
    | ren1(X5,X6,X7,X8) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[a6_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,plain,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ~ ren1(X1,X2,X3,X4)
      | ( greater(X1,X2)
        & greater(X3,X4) ) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[ren1_defn]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_4,plain,
    ( ~ ren1(X0,X1,X2,X3)
    | greater(X0,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | ~ reorganization(X0,X3,X4)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X5,X1)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X6,X2)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X7,X1)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X8,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | greater(X3,X1)
    | greater(X2,X4)
    | greater(X5,X6) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_6,c_4]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(mp2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X4] : accountability(X1,X4,X2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp2) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp2_elimTB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] : accountability(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[mp2])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp2_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
      | ? [X3] : accountability(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[mp2_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(mp2_skol,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
      | accountability(X1,skf2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skf2]),skolemize(X3,skf2(X1,X2))],[mp2_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_2,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | accountability(X0,skf2(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[mp2_skol])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(a1_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10,X11,X12,X13] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X12)
        & organization(X5,X13)
        & reliability(X1,X6,X12)
        & reliability(X5,X7,X13)
        & accountability(X1,X8,X12)
        & accountability(X5,X9,X13)
        & survival_chance(X1,X10,X12)
        & survival_chance(X5,X11,X13)
        & greater(X7,X6)
        & greater(X9,X8) )
     => greater(X11,X10) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a1_FOL) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a1_FOL_elimTB,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8,X9,X10] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X9)
        & organization(X2,X10)
        & reliability(X1,X3,X9)
        & reliability(X2,X4,X10)
        & accountability(X1,X5,X9)
        & accountability(X2,X6,X10)
        & survival_chance(X1,X7,X9)
        & survival_chance(X2,X8,X10)
        & greater(X4,X3)
        & greater(X6,X5) )
     => greater(X8,X7) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[a1_FOL])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(a1_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ! [X9,X10] :
          ( ~ organization(X1,X9)
          | ~ organization(X2,X10)
          | ~ reliability(X1,X3,X9)
          | ~ reliability(X2,X4,X10)
          | ~ accountability(X1,X5,X9)
          | ~ accountability(X2,X6,X10)
          | ~ survival_chance(X1,X7,X9)
          | ~ survival_chance(X2,X8,X10)
          | ~ greater(X4,X3)
          | ~ greater(X6,X5) )
      | greater(X8,X7) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[a1_FOL_elimTB]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_3,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X2,X3)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X4,X1)
    | ~ reliability(X2,X5,X3)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X6,X1)
    | ~ accountability(X2,X7,X3)
    | ~ survival_chance(X0,X8,X1)
    | ~ survival_chance(X2,X9,X3)
    | ~ greater(X5,X4)
    | ~ greater(X7,X6)
    | greater(X9,X8) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[a1_FOL_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_5,plain,
    ( ~ ren1(X0,X1,X2,X3)
    | greater(X2,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[ren1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope])]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(mp1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] : reliability(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp1) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp1_elimTB,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] : reliability(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[mp1])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(mp1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
      | ? [X3] : reliability(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[mp1_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(mp1_skol,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
      | reliability(X1,skf1(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skf1]),skolemize(X3,skf1(X1,X2))],[mp1_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_1,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | reliability(X0,skf1(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[mp1_skol])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_17,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization(X0,X3,X4)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X5,X1)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X6,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | greater(X5,X6)
    | greater(X3,X1)
    | greater(X2,X4) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_6,c_1,c_1]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_18,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X4,X1)
    | ~ reliability(X2,X5,X3)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X6,X1)
    | ~ survival_chance(X0,X7,X1)
    | ~ survival_chance(X2,X8,X3)
    | ~ greater(X5,X4)
    | ~ reorganization(X2,X9,X10)
    | ~ accountability(X2,X6,X11)
    | ~ greater(X11,X3)
    | ~ organization(X2,X11)
    | ~ organization(X2,X3)
    | greater(X8,X7)
    | greater(X9,X3)
    | greater(X11,X10) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3,c_17,c_2]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_19,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X0,X2)
    | ~ reorganization(X0,X3,X4)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X5,X1)
    | ~ reliability(X0,X6,X2)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X7,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ organization(X0,X1)
    | ~ organization(X8,X9)
    | ~ reliability(X8,X6,X9)
    | ~ reliability(X10,X5,X11)
    | ~ accountability(X8,X12,X9)
    | ~ survival_chance(X8,X13,X9)
    | ~ survival_chance(X10,X14,X11)
    | ~ reorganization(X10,X15,X16)
    | ~ accountability(X10,X12,X17)
    | ~ greater(X17,X11)
    | ~ organization(X10,X17)
    | ~ organization(X10,X11)
    | greater(X3,X1)
    | greater(X2,X4)
    | greater(X14,X13)
    | greater(X15,X11)
    | greater(X17,X16) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_16,c_2,c_18]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization(X0,X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X3,X4)
    | ~ accountability(X0,X5,X3)
    | ~ survival_chance(X0,X6,X3)
    | ~ survival_chance(X0,X7,X4)
    | ~ organization(X0,X4)
    | ~ organization(X0,X3)
    | greater(X1,X4)
    | greater(X3,X2)
    | greater(X7,X6) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_19,c_1,c_1]) ).

% FILE RECORD
fof(t4_FOL,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
      ( ( organization(X1,X12)
        & organization(X1,X13)
        & reorganization(X1,X14,X15)
        & survival_chance(X1,X10,X12)
        & survival_chance(X1,X11,X13)
        & ~ greater(X14,X12)
        & greater(X13,X12)
        & ~ greater(X13,X15) )
     => greater(X10,X11) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',t4_FOL) ).

% NEGATING CONJECTURE
fof(t4_FOL_nc,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X10,X11,X12,X13,X14,X15] :
        ( ( organization(X1,X12)
          & organization(X1,X13)
          & reorganization(X1,X14,X15)
          & survival_chance(X1,X10,X12)
          & survival_chance(X1,X11,X13)
          & ~ greater(X14,X12)
          & greater(X13,X12)
          & ~ greater(X13,X15) )
       => greater(X10,X11) ),
    inference(negating_conjecture,[status(cth)],[t4_FOL]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(t4_FOL_nc_elimTB,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3,X4,X5,X6,X7] :
        ( ( organization(X1,X4)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & reorganization(X1,X6,X7)
          & survival_chance(X1,X2,X4)
          & survival_chance(X1,X3,X5)
          & ~ greater(X6,X4)
          & greater(X5,X4)
          & ~ greater(X5,X7) )
       => greater(X2,X3) ),
    inference(elimTB,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc])]) ).

% FOF SIMPLE INFERENCE
fof(t4_FOL_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,negated_conjecture,
    ? [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( ? [X4,X5,X6,X7] :
          ( organization(X1,X4)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & reorganization(X1,X6,X7)
          & survival_chance(X1,X2,X4)
          & survival_chance(X1,X3,X5)
          & ~ greater(X6,X4)
          & greater(X5,X4)
          & ~ greater(X5,X7) )
      & ~ greater(X2,X3) ),
    inference(elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_elimTB]) ).

% FOF SKOLEM INFERENCE. WIP!!
fof(t4_FOL_nc_skol,negated_conjecture,
    ( organization(skc3,skc6)
    & organization(skc3,skc7)
    & reorganization(skc3,skc8,skc9)
    & survival_chance(skc3,skc4,skc6)
    & survival_chance(skc3,skc5,skc7)
    & ~ greater(skc8,skc6)
    & greater(skc7,skc6)
    & ~ greater(skc7,skc9)
    & ~ greater(skc4,skc5) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[skc3,skc4,skc5,skc6,skc7,skc8,skc9]),skolemize(X1,skc3),skolemize(X2,skc4),skolemize(X3,skc5),skolemize(X4,skc6),skolemize(X5,skc7),skolemize(X6,skc8),skolemize(X7,skc9)],[t4_FOL_nc_elimImpEquivPushNegMiniScope]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_9,plain,
    reorganization(skc3,skc8,skc9),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_10,plain,
    survival_chance(skc3,skc4,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_11,plain,
    survival_chance(skc3,skc5,skc7),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_12,plain,
    ~ greater(skc8,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_14,plain,
    ~ greater(skc7,skc9),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_15,plain,
    ~ greater(skc4,skc5),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_7,plain,
    organization(skc3,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_8,plain,
    organization(skc3,skc7),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% FOF PUSH DISJ SPLITTING.
cnf(c_13,plain,
    greater(skc7,skc6),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[inference(push_disj,[status(thm)],[t4_FOL_nc_skol])]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_20,c_2,c_9,c_10,c_11,c_12,c_14,c_15,c_7,c_8,c_13]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT004+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:30:54 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.37  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % Input Clauses:
% 0.35/0.60  % 1:2:2:INP:TopTop: organization(x0,x1) -> reliability(x0,skf1(x0,x1),x1)
% 0.35/0.60  % 2:2:2:INP:TopTop: organization(x0,x1) -> accountability(x0,skf2(x0,x1),x1)
% 0.35/0.60  % 3:11:10:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x2,x3),reliability(x0,x4,x1),reliability(x2,x5,x3),accountability(x0,x6,x1),accountability(x2,x7,x3),survival_chance(x0,x8,x1),survival_chance(x2,x9,x3),greater(x5,x4),greater(x7,x6) -> greater(x9,x8)
% 0.35/0.60  % 4:2:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2,x3) -> greater(x0,x1)
% 0.35/0.60  % 5:2:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2,x3) -> greater(x2,x3)
% 0.35/0.60  % 6:11:9:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x0,x2),reorganization(x0,x3,x4),reliability(x0,x5,x1),reliability(x0,x6,x2),accountability(x0,x7,x1),accountability(x0,x8,x2),greater(x2,x1) -> greater(x3,x1),greater(x2,x4),ren1(x5,x6,x7,x8)
% 0.35/0.60  % 7:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc3,skc6)
% 0.35/0.60  % 8:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc3,skc7)
% 0.35/0.60  % 9:1:0:INP::  -> reorganization(skc3,skc8,skc9)
% 0.35/0.60  % 10:1:0:INP::  -> survival_chance(skc3,skc4,skc6)
% 0.35/0.60  % 11:1:0:INP::  -> survival_chance(skc3,skc5,skc7)
% 0.35/0.60  % 12:1:0:INP:: greater(skc8,skc6) -> 
% 0.35/0.60  % 13:1:0:INP::  -> greater(skc7,skc6)
% 0.35/0.60  % 14:1:0:INP:: greater(skc7,skc9) -> 
% 0.35/0.60  % 15:1:0:INP:: greater(skc4,skc5) -> 
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % Predicates: organization reliability accountability survival_chance greater reorganization ren1 
% 0.35/0.60  % Fol Constants: skc3 skc4 skc5 skc6 skc7 skc8 skc9 
% 0.35/0.60  % Fol Functions: skf1 skf2 
% 0.35/0.60  % Problem Properties:
% 0.35/0.60  % This is a full first-order problem without equality. The Problem is non-linear. 
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % Reduced Input Axiom Clauses:
% 0.35/0.60  % 1:2:2:INP:TopTop: organization(x0,x1) -> reliability(x0,skf1(x0,x1),x1)
% 0.35/0.60  % 2:2:2:INP:TopTop: organization(x0,x1) -> accountability(x0,skf2(x0,x1),x1)
% 0.35/0.60  % 4:2:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2,x3) -> greater(x0,x1)
% 0.35/0.60  % 5:2:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: ren1(x0,x1,x2,x3) -> greater(x2,x3)
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % Reduced Input Conjecture Clauses:
% 0.35/0.60  % 3:11:10:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x2,x3),reliability(x0,x4,x1),reliability(x2,x5,x3),accountability(x0,x6,x1),accountability(x2,x7,x3),survival_chance(x0,x8,x1),survival_chance(x2,x9,x3),greater(x5,x4),greater(x7,x6) -> greater(x9,x8)
% 0.35/0.60  % 6:11:9:INP:TopTopTopTopTopTopTopTopTop: organization(x0,x1),organization(x0,x2),reorganization(x0,x3,x4),reliability(x0,x5,x1),reliability(x0,x6,x2),accountability(x0,x7,x1),accountability(x0,x8,x2),greater(x2,x1) -> greater(x3,x1),greater(x2,x4),ren1(x5,x6,x7,x8)
% 0.35/0.60  % 7:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc3,skc6)
% 0.35/0.60  % 8:1:0:INP::  -> organization(skc3,skc7)
% 0.35/0.60  % 9:1:0:INP::  -> reorganization(skc3,skc8,skc9)
% 0.35/0.60  % 10:1:0:INP::  -> survival_chance(skc3,skc4,skc6)
% 0.35/0.60  % 11:1:0:INP::  -> survival_chance(skc3,skc5,skc7)
% 0.35/0.60  % 12:1:0:INP:: greater(skc8,skc6) -> 
% 0.35/0.60  % 13:1:0:INP::  -> greater(skc7,skc6)
% 0.35/0.60  % 14:1:0:INP:: greater(skc7,skc9) -> 
% 0.35/0.60  % 15:1:0:INP:: greater(skc4,skc5) -> 
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 40 atoms initially. Used heuristic: lmodel_grow ===
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.35/0.60  % Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.35/0.60  % Number of learned clauses: 5
% 0.35/0.60  % Number of propagations: 73
% 0.35/0.60  % Number of decisions: 38
% 0.35/0.60  % Number of resolutions: 20
% 0.35/0.60  % Number of condensations: 1
% 0.35/0.60  % Number of sub resolutions: 0
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % Solver is done. Empty clause found
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.35/0.60  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.35/0.60  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % Needed:       0:00:00.23
% 0.35/0.60  
% 0.35/0.60  % ###
% 0.35/0.60  % ### Pagesize: 8192
% 0.35/0.60  % ### Marksize: 0
% 0.35/0.60  % ### Memory demanded:  2931 KBytes
% 0.35/0.60  % ### Memory freed:     2931 KBytes
% 0.35/0.60  % ### Memory remaining: 0 Bytes
% 0.35/0.60  % ### Pages allocated:  454 Pages
% 0.35/0.60  % ###
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------