%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT004-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:14 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 58.37s 58.54s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT004-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.08/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:38:22 UTC 2026 % 0.08/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.23/0.51 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.37/58.52 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.52 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.37/58.52 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.37/58.53 % Transform :cnf % 58.37/58.53 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.37/58.53 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 % Result :Theorem 58.034198s % 58.37/58.53 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.034198s % 58.37/58.53 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 % File : MGT004-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 58.37/58.53 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.37/58.53 % Problem : Attempts at reorganization increase death rates. % 58.37/58.53 % Version : [PB+94] axioms. % 58.37/58.53 % English : % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.37/58.53 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.37/58.53 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.37/58.53 % Source : [TPTP] % 58.37/58.53 % Names : % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 58.37/58.53 % Rating : 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.14 v6.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0 % 58.37/58.53 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 9 unt; 2 nHn; 14 RR) % 58.37/58.53 % Number of literals : 46 ( 0 equ; 31 neg) % 58.37/58.53 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 3 avg) % 58.37/58.53 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 58.37/58.53 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.37/58.53 % Number of functors : 9 ( 9 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty) % 58.37/58.53 % Number of variables : 32 ( 4 sgn) % 58.37/58.53 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT004+1.p % 58.37/58.53 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 cnf(mp1_1,axiom, % 58.37/58.53 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.53 | reliability(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(mp2_2,axiom, % 58.37/58.53 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.53 | accountability(A,sk2(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(a1_FOL_3,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.53 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ survival_chance(A,I,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ survival_chance(C,J,D) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ greater(F,E) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ greater(H,G) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(J,I) ) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(a6_FOL_4,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.53 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ organization(A,C) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reliability(A,F,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reliability(A,G,C) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ accountability(A,H,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ accountability(A,I,C) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(D,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ greater(C,B) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(C,E) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(F,G) ) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(a6_FOL_5,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.53 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ organization(A,C) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reorganization(A,D,E) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reliability(A,F,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ reliability(A,G,C) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ accountability(A,H,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ accountability(A,I,C) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(D,B) % 58.37/58.53 | ~ greater(C,B) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(C,E) % 58.37/58.53 | greater(H,I) ) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_6,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 organization(sk3,sk6) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_7,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 organization(sk3,sk7) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_8,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 reorganization(sk3,sk8,sk9) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_9,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 survival_chance(sk3,sk4,sk6) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_10,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 survival_chance(sk3,sk5,sk7) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_11,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 ~ greater(sk8,sk6) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_12,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 greater(sk7,sk6) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_13,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 ~ greater(sk7,sk9) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 cnf(t4_FOL_14,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.53 ~ greater(sk4,sk5) ). % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.54 % Proof found % 58.37/58.54 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.37/58.54 % SZS output start Proof % 58.37/58.54 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.37/58.54 %VarNum:94(SingletonVarNum:32) % 58.37/58.54 %MaxLitNum:11 % 58.37/58.54 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.37/58.54 %SharedTerms:16 % 58.37/58.54 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 % 58.37/58.54 %singleGoalClaCount:9 % 58.37/58.54 [1]P1(a1,a4) % 58.37/58.54 [2]P1(a1,a7) % 58.37/58.54 [3]P2(a7,a4) % 58.37/58.54 [4]P4(a1,a5,a4) % 58.37/58.54 [5]P4(a1,a6,a7) % 58.37/58.54 [6]P5(a1,a8,a9) % 58.37/58.54 [7]~P2(a7,a9) % 58.37/58.54 [8]~P2(a8,a4) % 58.37/58.54 [9]~P2(a5,a6) % 58.37/58.54 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f2(x102,x101),x102) % 58.37/58.54 [11]~P1(x111,x112)+P3(x111,f3(x112,x111),x112) % 58.37/58.54 [12]~P1(x127,x124)+~P2(x125,x124)+~P3(x127,x122,x125)+~P3(x127,x121,x124)+~P5(x127,x123,x126)+P2(x121,x122)+P2(x123,x124)+~P6(x127,x128,x125)+~P6(x127,x129,x124)+P2(x125,x126)+~P1(x127,x125) % 58.37/58.54 [13]~P1(x137,x134)+~P2(x135,x134)+~P6(x137,x132,x135)+~P6(x137,x131,x134)+~P5(x137,x133,x136)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x134)+~P3(x137,x138,x135)+~P3(x137,x139,x134)+P2(x135,x136)+~P1(x137,x135) % 58.37/58.54 [14]~P6(x143,x149,x144)+~P6(x145,x1410,x146)+~P3(x143,x147,x144)+~P3(x145,x148,x146)+~P4(x143,x141,x144)+~P4(x145,x142,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148)+~P2(x149,x1410) % 58.37/58.54 %EqnAxiom % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52241,plain, % 58.37/58.59 (P6(a1,f2(a4,a1),a4)), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10])). % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52243,plain, % 58.37/58.59 (P3(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10,11])). % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52246,plain, % 58.37/58.59 (P3(a1,f3(a7,a1),a7)), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,11])). % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52248,plain, % 58.37/58.59 (P6(a1,f2(a7,a1),a7)), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,11,10])). % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52250,plain, % 58.37/58.59 (P2(f3(a4,a1),f3(a7,a1))), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,52241,52243,6,2,8,3,7,11,10,12])). % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52253,plain, % 58.37/58.59 (P2(f2(a4,a1),f2(a7,a1))), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,52246,52248,52241,6,52243,2,8,3,7,13])). % 58.37/58.59 cnf(52277,plain, % 58.37/58.59 ($false), % 58.37/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,52250,52253,52241,52248,52246,52243,5,4,2,9,14]), % 58.37/58.59 ['proof']). % 58.50/58.60 % SZS output end Proof % 58.50/58.60 % Total time :58.034198s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------