↑ Up

CSE---1.7.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : MGT006+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:04:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 58.34s 58.54s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : MGT006+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 11:41:45 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.23/0.50  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.34/58.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.34/58.53  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.34/58.53  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.34/58.53  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.34/58.53  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.34/58.53  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.34/58.53  
% 58.34/58.53  % Result      :Theorem 58.012647s
% 58.34/58.53  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.012647s
% 58.34/58.53  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.34/58.53  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.34/58.53  % File     : MGT006+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 58.34/58.53  % Domain   : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 58.34/58.53  % Problem  : Reliability and accountability increase with time.
% 58.34/58.53  % Version  : Especial.
% 58.34/58.53  %            Theorem formulation : Different.
% 58.34/58.53  % English  :
% 58.34/58.53  
% 58.34/58.53  % Refs     : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 58.34/58.53  %          : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 58.34/58.53  %          : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 58.34/58.53  % Source   : [Kam94]
% 58.34/58.53  % Names    : THEOREM 6 [PB+92]
% 58.34/58.53  %          : T6FOL2 [PB+94]
% 58.34/58.53  
% 58.34/58.53  % Status   : Theorem
% 58.34/58.53  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.3.0, 0.05 v9.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.08 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.12 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.1.0
% 58.34/58.53  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    4 (   0 unt;   0 def)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Number of atoms       :   30 (   0 equ)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   7 avg)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Number of connectives :   26 (   0   ~;   0   |;  21   &)
% 58.34/58.53  %                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Maximal formula depth :   19 (  13 avg)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   6 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 58.34/58.53  %            Number of variables   :   25 (  24   !;   1   ?)
% 58.34/58.53  % SPC      : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ
% 58.34/58.53  
% 58.34/58.53  % Comments : Contains one less theorem predicate than [Kam94].
% 58.34/58.53  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.34/58.53  fof(mp3,axiom,
% 58.34/58.53      ! [X,T] :
% 58.34/58.53        ( organization(X,T)
% 58.34/58.53       => ? [Rp] : reproducibility(X,Rp,T) ) ).
% 58.34/58.53  
% 58.34/58.53  %----Reliability and accountability require that organizational
% 58.34/58.53  %----structures be highly reproducible.
% 58.34/58.53  fof(a2_FOL,hypothesis,
% 58.34/58.53      ! [X,Y,T1,T2,R1,R2,A1,A2,Rp1,Rp2] :
% 58.34/58.54        ( ( organization(X,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & organization(Y,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & reliability(X,R1,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & reliability(Y,R2,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & accountability(X,A1,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & accountability(Y,A2,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2) )
% 58.34/58.54       => ( greater(Rp2,Rp1)
% 58.34/58.54        <=> ( greater(R2,R1)
% 58.34/58.54            & greater(A2,A1) ) ) ) ).
% 58.34/58.54  
% 58.34/58.54  %----Reproducibility of structure increases monotonically with age.
% 58.34/58.54  fof(a4_FOL,hypothesis,
% 58.34/58.54      ! [X,Rp1,Rp2,T1,T2] :
% 58.34/58.54        ( ( organization(X,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & organization(X,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & reproducibility(X,Rp2,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & greater(T2,T1) )
% 58.34/58.54       => greater(Rp2,Rp1) ) ).
% 58.34/58.54  
% 58.34/58.54  fof(t6_FOL,conjecture,
% 58.34/58.54      ! [X,R1,R2,A1,A2,T1,T2] :
% 58.34/58.54        ( ( organization(X,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & organization(X,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & reorganization_free(X,T1,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & reliability(X,R1,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & reliability(X,R2,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & accountability(X,A1,T1)
% 58.34/58.54          & accountability(X,A2,T2)
% 58.34/58.54          & greater(T2,T1) )
% 58.34/58.54       => ( greater(R2,R1)
% 58.34/58.54          & greater(A2,A1) ) ) ).
% 58.34/58.54  
% 58.34/58.54  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.34/58.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.34/58.54  % Proof found
% 58.34/58.54  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.34/58.54  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.34/58.54  %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0)
% 58.34/58.54  %VarNum:103(SingletonVarNum:37)
% 58.34/58.54  %MaxLitNum:11
% 58.34/58.54  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.34/58.54  %SharedTerms:17
% 58.34/58.54  %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% 58.34/58.54  %singleGoalClaCount:8
% 58.34/58.54  [1]P1(a1,a3)
% 58.34/58.54  [2]P1(a1,a8)
% 58.34/58.54  [3]P2(a8,a3)
% 58.34/58.54  [4]P4(a1,a4,a3)
% 58.34/58.54  [5]P4(a1,a5,a8)
% 58.34/58.54  [6]P3(a1,a6,a3)
% 58.34/58.54  [7]P3(a1,a7,a8)
% 58.34/58.54  [8]P5(a1,a3,a8)
% 58.34/58.54  [9]~P2(a5,a4)+~P2(a7,a6)
% 58.34/58.54  [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f2(x101,x102),x102)
% 58.34/58.54  [11]~P2(x114,x115)+~P6(x113,x111,x114)+~P6(x113,x112,x115)+~P5(x113,x115,x114)+P2(x111,x112)+~P1(x113,x114)+~P1(x113,x115)
% 58.34/58.54  [12]~P6(x123,x127,x124)+~P6(x125,x128,x126)+~P3(x123,x121,x124)+~P3(x125,x122,x126)+P2(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x124)+~P4(x123,x129,x124)+~P1(x125,x126)+~P4(x125,x1210,x126)+~P2(x127,x128)
% 58.34/58.54  [13]~P6(x133,x137,x134)+~P6(x135,x138,x136)+~P4(x133,x131,x134)+~P4(x135,x132,x136)+P2(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x134)+~P3(x133,x139,x134)+~P1(x135,x136)+~P3(x135,x1310,x136)+~P2(x137,x138)
% 58.34/58.54  [14]~P6(x143,x141,x144)+~P6(x145,x142,x146)+~P4(x143,x149,x144)+~P4(x145,x1410,x146)+~P3(x143,x147,x144)+~P3(x145,x148,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148)+~P2(x149,x1410)
% 58.34/58.54  %EqnAxiom
% 58.34/58.54  
% 58.34/58.54  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(15,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (P2(x151,x152)+~P6(a1,x151,a8)+~P6(a1,x152,a3)),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,8,11])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117275,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (P6(a1,f2(a1,a3),a3)),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117282,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (P6(a1,f2(a1,a8),a8)),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[2,10])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117284,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (P2(f2(a1,a8),f2(a1,a3))),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[117275,2,10,15])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117286,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (P2(a5,a4)),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,117275,5,7,4,6,2,10,15,13])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117291,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (~P2(a7,a6)),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[117286,9])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117292,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     (P2(a7,a6)),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[1,117284,117282,117275,5,7,4,6,2,12])).
% 58.46/58.65  cnf(117299,plain,
% 58.46/58.65     ($false),
% 58.46/58.65     inference(scs_inference,[],[117291,117292]),
% 58.46/58.65     ['proof']).
% 58.46/58.68  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.46/58.68  % Total time :58.012647s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------