%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT006-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n005.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:14 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 58.37s 58.54s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT006-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.08/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:42:50 UTC 2026 % 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.28/0.51 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.37/58.53 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.37/58.53 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.37/58.53 % Transform :cnf % 58.37/58.53 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.37/58.53 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.37/58.53 % 58.37/58.53 % Result :Theorem 58.011146s % 58.37/58.53 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.011146s % 58.37/58.53 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.53 % File : MGT006-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 58.37/58.53 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.37/58.53 % Problem : Reliability and accountability increase with time. % 58.37/58.53 % Version : Especial. % 58.37/58.53 % Theorem formulation : Different. % 58.37/58.53 % English : % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.37/58.54 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.37/58.54 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.37/58.54 % Source : [TPTP] % 58.37/58.54 % Names : % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 58.37/58.54 % Rating : 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.06 v5.4.0, 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.05 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0 % 58.37/58.54 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 14 RR) % 58.37/58.54 % Number of literals : 50 ( 0 equ; 37 neg) % 58.37/58.54 % Maximal clause size : 11 ( 3 avg) % 58.37/58.54 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 58.37/58.54 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.37/58.54 % Number of functors : 8 ( 8 usr; 7 con; 0-2 aty) % 58.37/58.54 % Number of variables : 37 ( 4 sgn) % 58.37/58.54 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 % Comments : Contains one less theorem predicate than [Kam94]. % 58.37/58.54 % : Create with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT006+1.p % 58.37/58.54 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.54 cnf(mp3_1,axiom, % 58.37/58.54 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.54 | reproducibility(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(a2_FOL_2,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.54 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ greater(J,I) % 58.37/58.54 | greater(F,E) ) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(a2_FOL_3,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.54 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ greater(J,I) % 58.37/58.54 | greater(H,G) ) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(a2_FOL_4,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.54 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ greater(F,E) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ greater(H,G) % 58.37/58.54 | greater(J,I) ) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(a4_FOL_5,hypothesis, % 58.37/58.54 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ organization(A,C) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(A,D,B) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ reproducibility(A,E,C) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ greater(C,B) % 58.37/58.54 | greater(E,D) ) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_6,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 organization(sk2,sk7) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_7,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 organization(sk2,sk8) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_8,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 reorganization_free(sk2,sk7,sk8) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_9,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 reliability(sk2,sk3,sk7) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_10,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 reliability(sk2,sk4,sk8) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_11,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 accountability(sk2,sk5,sk7) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_12,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 accountability(sk2,sk6,sk8) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_13,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 greater(sk8,sk7) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 cnf(t6_FOL_14,negated_conjecture, % 58.37/58.54 ( ~ greater(sk4,sk3) % 58.37/58.54 | ~ greater(sk6,sk5) ) ). % 58.37/58.54 % 58.37/58.54 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.54 %------------------------------------------- % 58.37/58.54 % Proof found % 58.37/58.54 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.37/58.54 % SZS output start Proof % 58.37/58.55 %ClaNum:14(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.37/58.55 %VarNum:103(SingletonVarNum:37) % 58.37/58.55 %MaxLitNum:11 % 58.37/58.55 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.37/58.55 %SharedTerms:17 % 58.37/58.55 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 % 58.37/58.55 %singleGoalClaCount:8 % 58.37/58.55 [1]P1(a1,a3) % 58.37/58.55 [2]P1(a1,a8) % 58.37/58.55 [3]P2(a8,a3) % 58.37/58.55 [4]P4(a1,a4,a3) % 58.37/58.55 [5]P4(a1,a5,a8) % 58.37/58.55 [6]P3(a1,a6,a3) % 58.37/58.55 [7]P3(a1,a7,a8) % 58.37/58.55 [8]P5(a1,a3,a8) % 58.37/58.55 [9]~P2(a5,a4)+~P2(a7,a6) % 58.37/58.55 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f2(x102,x101),x102) % 58.37/58.55 [11]~P2(x114,x115)+~P6(x113,x111,x114)+~P6(x113,x112,x115)+~P5(x113,x115,x114)+P2(x111,x112)+~P1(x113,x114)+~P1(x113,x115) % 58.37/58.55 [12]~P6(x123,x127,x124)+~P6(x125,x128,x126)+~P3(x123,x121,x124)+~P3(x125,x122,x126)+P2(x121,x122)+~P1(x123,x124)+~P4(x123,x129,x124)+~P1(x125,x126)+~P4(x125,x1210,x126)+~P2(x127,x128) % 58.37/58.55 [13]~P6(x133,x137,x134)+~P6(x135,x138,x136)+~P4(x133,x131,x134)+~P4(x135,x132,x136)+P2(x131,x132)+~P1(x133,x134)+~P3(x133,x139,x134)+~P1(x135,x136)+~P3(x135,x1310,x136)+~P2(x137,x138) % 58.37/58.55 [14]~P6(x143,x141,x144)+~P6(x145,x142,x146)+~P4(x143,x149,x144)+~P4(x145,x1410,x146)+~P3(x143,x147,x144)+~P3(x145,x148,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148)+~P2(x149,x1410) % 58.37/58.55 %EqnAxiom % 58.37/58.55 % 58.37/58.55 %------------------------------------------- % 58.51/58.65 cnf(15,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (P2(x151,x152)+~P6(a1,x151,a8)+~P6(a1,x152,a3)), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,2,3,8,11])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116528,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (P6(a1,f2(a3,a1),a3)), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116535,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (P6(a1,f2(a8,a1),a8)), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,10])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116537,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (P2(f2(a8,a1),f2(a3,a1))), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[116528,2,10,15])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116539,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (P2(a5,a4)), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,116528,2,5,7,4,6,10,15,13])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116544,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (~P2(a7,a6)), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[116539,9])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116545,plain, % 58.51/58.65 (P2(a7,a6)), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,116537,116535,116528,2,5,7,4,6,12])). % 58.51/58.65 cnf(116552,plain, % 58.51/58.65 ($false), % 58.51/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[116544,116545]), % 58.51/58.65 ['proof']). % 58.51/58.70 % SZS output end Proof % 58.51/58.70 % Total time :58.011146s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------