%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT007+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:14 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 58.19s 58.41s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.01 % Problem : MGT007+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.00/0.01 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.03/0.28 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu % 0.03/0.28 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.03/0.28 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.03/0.28 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.03/0.28 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.03/0.28 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.28 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.03/0.28 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:43:11 UTC 2026 % 0.03/0.29 % CPUTime : % 0.09/0.37 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.19/58.41 %------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.41 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.19/58.41 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.19/58.41 % Transform :cnf % 58.19/58.41 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.19/58.41 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 % Result :Theorem 58.025683s % 58.19/58.41 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.025683s % 58.19/58.41 %------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.41 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.41 % File : MGT007+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0. % 58.19/58.41 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.19/58.41 % Problem : Reproducibility decreases during reorganization. % 58.19/58.41 % Version : [PB+94] axioms. % 58.19/58.41 % English : % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.19/58.41 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.19/58.41 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.19/58.41 % Source : [Kam94] % 58.19/58.41 % Names : THEOREM 7 [PB+92] % 58.19/58.41 % : T7FOL1 [PB+94] % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 % Status : Theorem % 58.19/58.41 % Rating : 0.00 v9.3.0, 0.05 v9.1.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.08 v6.0.0, 0.50 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.22 v5.2.0, 0.00 v5.0.0, 0.05 v4.1.0, 0.06 v4.0.1, 0.05 v3.7.0, 0.00 v3.2.0, 0.11 v3.1.0, 0.00 v2.1.0 % 58.19/58.41 % Syntax : Number of formulae : 6 ( 0 unt; 0 def) % 58.19/58.41 % Number of atoms : 38 ( 0 equ) % 58.19/58.41 % Maximal formula atoms : 12 ( 6 avg) % 58.19/58.41 % Number of connectives : 36 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 25 &) % 58.19/58.41 % ( 1 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>) % 58.19/58.41 % Maximal formula depth : 21 ( 12 avg) % 58.19/58.41 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg) % 58.19/58.41 % Number of predicates : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.19/58.41 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty) % 58.19/58.41 % Number of variables : 35 ( 32 !; 3 ?) % 58.19/58.41 % SPC : FOF_THM_RFO_NEQ % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 % Comments : % 58.19/58.41 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.41 fof(mp1,axiom, % 58.19/58.41 ! [X,T] : % 58.19/58.41 ( organization(X,T) % 58.19/58.41 => ? [R] : reliability(X,R,T) ) ). % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 fof(mp2,axiom, % 58.19/58.41 ! [X,T] : % 58.19/58.41 ( organization(X,T) % 58.19/58.41 => ? [A] : accountability(X,A,T) ) ). % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 fof(mp_not_in_TR,axiom, % 58.19/58.41 ! [X,T] : % 58.19/58.41 ( organization(X,T) % 58.19/58.41 => ? [A] : reproducibility(X,A,T) ) ). % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 %----Reliability and accountability require that organizational % 58.19/58.41 %----structures be highly reproducible. % 58.19/58.41 fof(a2_FOL,hypothesis, % 58.19/58.41 ! [X,Y,T1,T2,R1,R2,A1,A2,Rp1,Rp2] : % 58.19/58.41 ( ( organization(X,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & organization(Y,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & reliability(X,R1,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & reliability(Y,R2,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & accountability(X,A1,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & accountability(Y,A2,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & reproducibility(Y,Rp2,T2) ) % 58.19/58.41 => ( greater(Rp2,Rp1) % 58.19/58.41 <=> ( greater(R2,R1) % 58.19/58.41 & greater(A2,A1) ) ) ) ). % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 %----The process of attempting reorganization lowers reliability of % 58.19/58.41 %----performance. % 58.19/58.41 fof(a6_FOL,hypothesis, % 58.19/58.41 ! [X,R1,R2,A1,A2,T1,T2,Ta,Tb] : % 58.19/58.41 ( ( organization(X,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & organization(X,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) % 58.19/58.41 & reliability(X,R1,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & reliability(X,R2,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & accountability(X,A1,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & accountability(X,A2,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & ~ greater(Ta,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & greater(T2,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & ~ greater(T2,Tb) ) % 58.19/58.41 => ( greater(R1,R2) % 58.19/58.41 & greater(A1,A2) ) ) ). % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 fof(t7_FOL,conjecture, % 58.19/58.41 ! [X,Rp1,Rp2,T1,T2,Ta,Tb] : % 58.19/58.41 ( ( organization(X,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & organization(X,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & reorganization(X,Ta,Tb) % 58.19/58.41 & reproducibility(X,Rp1,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & reproducibility(X,Rp2,T2) % 58.19/58.41 & ~ greater(Ta,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & greater(T2,T1) % 58.19/58.41 & ~ greater(T2,Tb) ) % 58.19/58.41 => greater(Rp1,Rp2) ) ). % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.41 %------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.41 % Proof found % 58.19/58.41 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.19/58.41 % SZS output start Proof % 58.19/58.41 %ClaNum:17(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.19/58.41 %VarNum:152(SingletonVarNum:54) % 58.19/58.41 %MaxLitNum:11 % 58.19/58.41 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.19/58.41 %SharedTerms:16 % 58.19/58.41 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 % 58.19/58.41 %singleGoalClaCount:9 % 58.19/58.41 [1]P1(a1,a6) % 58.19/58.41 [2]P1(a1,a9) % 58.19/58.41 [3]P2(a9,a6) % 58.19/58.41 [4]P4(a1,a7,a6) % 58.19/58.41 [5]P4(a1,a8,a9) % 58.19/58.41 [6]P5(a1,a10,a2) % 58.19/58.41 [7]~P2(a7,a8) % 58.19/58.41 [8]~P2(a9,a2) % 58.19/58.41 [9]~P2(a10,a6) % 58.19/58.41 [10]~P1(x101,x102)+P6(x101,f3(x101,x102),x102) % 58.19/58.41 [11]~P1(x111,x112)+P3(x111,f4(x111,x112),x112) % 58.19/58.41 [12]~P1(x121,x122)+P4(x121,f5(x121,x122),x122) % 58.19/58.41 [15]~P3(x153,x151,x154)+~P3(x155,x152,x156)+~P4(x153,x157,x154)+~P4(x155,x158,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P6(x153,x159,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P6(x155,x1510,x156)+~P2(x157,x158) % 58.19/58.41 [16]~P6(x163,x161,x164)+~P6(x165,x162,x166)+~P4(x163,x167,x164)+~P4(x165,x168,x166)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P3(x163,x169,x164)+~P1(x165,x166)+~P3(x165,x1610,x166)+~P2(x167,x168) % 58.19/58.41 [13]~P1(x137,x132)+~P2(x133,x132)+~P3(x137,x136,x133)+~P3(x137,x135,x132)+~P5(x137,x131,x134)+P2(x131,x132)+P2(x133,x134)+~P6(x137,x138,x133)+~P6(x137,x139,x132)+P2(x135,x136)+~P1(x137,x133) % 58.19/58.41 [14]~P1(x147,x142)+~P2(x143,x142)+~P6(x147,x146,x143)+~P6(x147,x145,x142)+~P5(x147,x141,x144)+P2(x141,x142)+P2(x143,x144)+~P3(x147,x148,x143)+~P3(x147,x149,x142)+P2(x145,x146)+~P1(x147,x143) % 58.19/58.41 [17]~P6(x173,x179,x174)+~P6(x175,x1710,x176)+~P3(x173,x177,x174)+~P3(x175,x178,x176)+~P4(x173,x171,x174)+~P4(x175,x172,x176)+P2(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174)+~P1(x175,x176)+~P2(x177,x178)+~P2(x179,x1710) % 58.19/58.41 %EqnAxiom % 58.19/58.41 % 58.19/58.41 %------------------------------------------- % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80354,plain, % 58.19/58.45 (P6(a1,f3(a1,a6),a6)), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10])). % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80356,plain, % 58.19/58.45 (P3(a1,f4(a1,a6),a6)), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,10,11])). % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80363,plain, % 58.19/58.45 (P6(a1,f3(a1,a9),a9)), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,10])). % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80365,plain, % 58.19/58.45 (P3(a1,f4(a1,a9),a9)), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,12,10,11])). % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80371,plain, % 58.19/58.45 (P2(f4(a1,a6),f4(a1,a9))), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,80363,80365,80354,80356,8,9,3,2,13])). % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80373,plain, % 58.19/58.45 (P2(f3(a1,a6),f3(a1,a9))), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,6,80363,80365,80354,80356,8,9,3,2,13,14])). % 58.19/58.45 cnf(80446,plain, % 58.19/58.45 ($false), % 58.19/58.45 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,80371,80373,5,4,80365,80356,80363,80354,7,2,17]), % 58.19/58.45 ['proof']). % 58.19/58.46 % SZS output end Proof % 58.19/58.46 % Total time :58.025683s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------