↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT007+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:43 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.34s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : MGT007+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.04/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.04/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.04/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.04/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.04/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.04/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.04/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.04/0.29  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:42:56 UTC 2026
% 0.04/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.04/0.31  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.04/0.31  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.04/0.31  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.04/0.31  #
% 0.04/0.31  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.04/0.31  # Number of axioms: 17 Number of unprocessed: 17
% 0.04/0.31  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.04/0.31  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.04/0.31  # Hello from C++
% 0.04/0.31  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.04/0.31  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.04/0.31  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.04/0.31  # 17 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.04/0.31  # Creating start rules for all 9 conjectures.
% 0.04/0.31  # There are 9 start rule candidates:
% 0.04/0.31  # Found 9 unit axioms.
% 0.04/0.31  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.04/0.31  # 9 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.04/0.31  # 8 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.04/0.31  # 9 unit axiom clauses
% 0.04/0.31  
% 0.04/0.31  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.04/0.32  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.04/0.32  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.04/0.32  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.10/0.33  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 10 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 1 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 10 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.10/0.34  # There were 9 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.10/0.34  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.34  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.34  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  # End clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.34  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk4_0,esk7_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (organization(esk4_0,esk8_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (greater(esk8_0,esk7_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (reproducibility(esk4_0,esk5_0,esk7_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (reproducibility(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk8_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (reorganization(esk4_0,esk9_0,esk10_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~greater(esk5_0,esk6_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~greater(esk8_0,esk10_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (~greater(esk9_0,esk7_0))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (reliability(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)|~organization(X1,X2))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (accountability(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2),X2)|~organization(X1,X2))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (reproducibility(X1,esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)|~organization(X1,X2))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X4)|~reproducibility(X5,X3,X6)|~reproducibility(X7,X4,X8)|~accountability(X5,X1,X6)|~accountability(X7,X2,X8)|~reliability(X5,X9,X6)|~reliability(X7,X10,X8)|~organization(X5,X6)|~organization(X7,X8))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X4)|~reproducibility(X5,X3,X6)|~reproducibility(X7,X4,X8)|~accountability(X5,X9,X6)|~accountability(X7,X10,X8)|~reliability(X5,X1,X6)|~reliability(X7,X2,X8)|~organization(X5,X6)|~organization(X7,X8))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_4, hypothesis, (greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X3,X4)|~greater(X5,X6)|~reproducibility(X7,X1,X8)|~reproducibility(X9,X2,X10)|~accountability(X7,X3,X8)|~accountability(X9,X4,X10)|~reliability(X7,X5,X8)|~reliability(X9,X6,X10)|~organization(X7,X8)|~organization(X9,X10))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_7, hypothesis, (greater(X1,X2)|greater(X3,X4)|greater(X5,X6)|~reorganization(X7,X5,X4)|~greater(X3,X6)|~accountability(X7,X2,X3)|~accountability(X7,X1,X6)|~reliability(X7,X8,X3)|~reliability(X7,X9,X6)|~organization(X7,X3)|~organization(X7,X6))).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (greater(X1,X2)|greater(X3,X4)|greater(X5,X6)|~reorganization(X7,X5,X4)|~greater(X3,X6)|~accountability(X7,X8,X3)|~accountability(X7,X9,X6)|~reliability(X7,X2,X3)|~reliability(X7,X1,X6)|~organization(X7,X3)|~organization(X7,X6))).
% 0.10/0.34  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.10/0.34  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.10/0.34  # Found 20 steps
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (reproducibility(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk8_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (reproducibility(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk8_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_33, plain, (greater(esk9_0,esk7_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_36, plain, (~reproducibility(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk8_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (~organization(esk4_0,esk8_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_42, plain, (~organization(esk4_0,esk8_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_34, plain, (~greater(esk6_0,esk6_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (~greater(esk8_0,esk7_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_11])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_57, plain, (~organization(esk4_0,esk8_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_58, plain, (~organization(esk4_0,esk8_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_37, plain, (~accountability(esk4_0,esk9_0,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_37, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_38, plain, (~accountability(esk4_0,esk7_0,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_38, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_39, plain, (~reliability(esk4_0,X19,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_39, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_40, plain, (~reliability(esk4_0,X20,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_40, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (~reproducibility(esk4_0,esk8_0,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_51, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (~reproducibility(esk4_0,esk7_0,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_52, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_53, plain, (~accountability(esk4_0,X21,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_53, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_54, plain, (~accountability(esk4_0,X22,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_54, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_55, plain, (~reliability(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_55, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  cnf(i_0_56, plain, (~reliability(esk4_0,esk6_0,esk8_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_56, ...])).
% 0.10/0.34  # End printing tableau
% 0.10/0.34  # SZS output end
% 0.10/0.34  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.10/0.34  # Child (2675072) has found a proof.
% 0.10/0.34  
% 0.10/0.34  # Proof search is over...
% 0.10/0.34  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------