%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT008-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:14 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 58.38s 58.55s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.04 % Problem : MGT008-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.10/0.36 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu % 0.10/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.10/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.10/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.10/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.03/0.36 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.03/0.36 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.03/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:48:27 UTC 2026 % 0.03/0.36 % CPUTime : % 0.24/0.53 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.38/58.54 %------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.54 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.38/58.54 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.38/58.54 % Transform :cnf % 58.38/58.54 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.38/58.54 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.38/58.54 % 58.38/58.54 % Result :Theorem 58.017022s % 58.38/58.54 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.017022s % 58.38/58.54 %------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.54 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.54 % File : MGT008-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 58.38/58.54 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.38/58.54 % Problem : Organizational death rates decrease with size. % 58.38/58.54 % Version : [PB+94] axioms. % 58.38/58.54 % English : % 58.38/58.54 % 58.38/58.54 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.38/58.54 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.38/58.54 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.38/58.54 % Source : [TPTP] % 58.38/58.54 % Names : % 58.38/58.54 % 58.38/58.54 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 58.38/58.54 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0 % 58.38/58.54 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 15 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 15 RR) % 58.38/58.54 % Number of literals : 34 ( 0 equ; 20 neg) % 58.38/58.54 % Maximal clause size : 10 ( 2 avg) % 58.38/58.54 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 58.38/58.54 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.38/58.54 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty) % 58.38/58.54 % Number of variables : 19 ( 0 sgn) % 58.38/58.54 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 58.38/58.54 % 58.38/58.54 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT008+1.p % 58.38/58.55 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.55 cnf(mp5_1,axiom, % 58.38/58.55 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.55 | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(a5_FOL_2,hypothesis, % 58.38/58.55 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ class(A,E,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ class(C,E,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ size(A,F,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ size(C,G,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ inertia(A,H,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ inertia(C,I,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ greater(G,F) % 58.38/58.55 | greater(I,H) ) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t1_FOL_3,hypothesis, % 58.38/58.55 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ inertia(A,E,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ inertia(C,F,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ survival_chance(A,G,B) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ survival_chance(C,H,D) % 58.38/58.55 | ~ greater(F,E) % 58.38/58.55 | greater(H,G) ) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_4,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 organization(sk2,sk9) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_5,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 organization(sk3,sk10) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_6,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 reorganization_free(sk2,sk9,sk9) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_7,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 reorganization_free(sk3,sk10,sk10) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_8,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 class(sk2,sk4,sk9) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_9,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 class(sk3,sk4,sk10) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_10,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 survival_chance(sk2,sk5,sk9) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_11,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 survival_chance(sk3,sk6,sk10) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_12,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 size(sk2,sk7,sk9) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_13,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 size(sk3,sk8,sk10) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_14,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 greater(sk8,sk7) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 cnf(t8_FOL_15,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.55 ~ greater(sk6,sk5) ). % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.55 %------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.55 % Proof found % 58.38/58.55 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.38/58.55 % SZS output start Proof % 58.38/58.55 %ClaNum:15(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.38/58.55 %VarNum:58(SingletonVarNum:19) % 58.38/58.55 %MaxLitNum:10 % 58.38/58.55 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.38/58.55 %SharedTerms:21 % 58.38/58.55 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % 58.38/58.55 %singleGoalClaCount:12 % 58.38/58.55 [1]P1(a1,a4) % 58.38/58.55 [2]P1(a5,a2) % 58.38/58.55 [3]P2(a6,a7) % 58.38/58.55 [4]P3(a1,a8,a4) % 58.38/58.55 [5]P3(a5,a8,a2) % 58.38/58.55 [6]P5(a1,a7,a4) % 58.38/58.55 [7]P5(a5,a6,a2) % 58.38/58.55 [8]P6(a1,a4,a4) % 58.38/58.55 [9]P6(a5,a2,a2) % 58.38/58.55 [10]P7(a1,a9,a4) % 58.38/58.55 [11]P7(a5,a10,a2) % 58.38/58.55 [12]~P2(a10,a9) % 58.38/58.55 [13]~P1(x131,x132)+P4(x131,f3(x132,x131),x132) % 58.38/58.55 [15]~P4(x153,x157,x154)+~P4(x155,x158,x156)+~P6(x153,x154,x154)+~P6(x155,x156,x156)+~P7(x153,x151,x154)+~P7(x155,x152,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P2(x157,x158) % 58.38/58.55 [14]~P4(x143,x141,x144)+~P4(x145,x142,x146)+~P3(x145,x149,x146)+~P5(x143,x147,x144)+~P5(x145,x148,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P3(x143,x149,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148) % 58.38/58.55 %EqnAxiom % 58.38/58.55 % 58.38/58.55 %------------------------------------------- % 58.50/58.65 cnf(103414,plain, % 58.50/58.65 (P4(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)), % 58.50/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,13])). % 58.50/58.65 cnf(103418,plain, % 58.50/58.65 (P4(a5,f3(a2,a5),a2)), % 58.50/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13])). % 58.50/58.65 cnf(103424,plain, % 58.50/58.65 (~P2(f3(a2,a5),f3(a4,a1))), % 58.50/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,103418,103414,2,9,11,8,10,12,15])). % 58.50/58.65 cnf(103448,plain, % 58.50/58.65 ($false), % 58.50/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,103424,103418,103414,2,7,6,3,5,4,14]), % 58.50/58.65 ['proof']). % 58.50/58.69 % SZS output end Proof % 58.50/58.69 % Total time :58.017022s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------