%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT009-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:15 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 58.35s 58.51s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT009-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.08/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.34 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.08/0.34 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.08/0.34 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.34 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:47:00 UTC 2026 % 0.08/0.34 % CPUTime : % 0.26/0.49 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.35/58.50 %------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.50 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.35/58.50 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.35/58.50 % Transform :cnf % 58.35/58.50 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.35/58.50 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.35/58.50 % 58.35/58.50 % Result :Theorem 58.014253s % 58.35/58.50 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.014253s % 58.35/58.50 %------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.51 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.51 % File : MGT009-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 58.35/58.51 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.35/58.51 % Problem : Large organization have higher reproducibility % 58.35/58.51 % Version : [PB+94] axioms. % 58.35/58.51 % English : % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.35/58.51 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.35/58.51 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.35/58.51 % Source : [TPTP] % 58.35/58.51 % Names : % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 58.35/58.51 % Rating : 0.00 v9.3.0, 0.06 v9.1.0, 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0 % 58.35/58.51 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 12 unt; 0 nHn; 16 RR) % 58.35/58.51 % Number of literals : 44 ( 0 equ; 29 neg) % 58.35/58.51 % Maximal clause size : 10 ( 2 avg) % 58.35/58.51 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 58.35/58.51 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.35/58.51 % Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 9 con; 0-2 aty) % 58.35/58.51 % Number of variables : 27 ( 0 sgn) % 58.35/58.51 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT009+1.p % 58.35/58.51 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.51 cnf(mp5_1,axiom, % 58.35/58.51 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.35/58.51 | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(a3_FOL_2,hypothesis, % 58.35/58.51 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reproducibility(A,E,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reproducibility(C,F,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ inertia(A,G,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ inertia(C,H,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ greater(F,E) % 58.35/58.51 | greater(H,G) ) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(a3_FOL_3,hypothesis, % 58.35/58.51 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reproducibility(A,E,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ reproducibility(C,F,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ inertia(A,G,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ inertia(C,H,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ greater(H,G) % 58.35/58.51 | greater(F,E) ) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(a5_FOL_4,hypothesis, % 58.35/58.51 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ class(A,E,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ class(C,E,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ size(A,F,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ size(C,G,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ inertia(A,H,B) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ inertia(C,I,D) % 58.35/58.51 | ~ greater(G,F) % 58.35/58.51 | greater(I,H) ) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_5,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 organization(sk2,sk9) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_6,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 organization(sk3,sk10) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_7,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 reorganization_free(sk2,sk9,sk9) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_8,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 reorganization_free(sk3,sk10,sk10) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_9,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 class(sk2,sk4,sk9) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_10,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 class(sk3,sk4,sk10) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_11,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 reproducibility(sk2,sk5,sk9) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_12,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 reproducibility(sk3,sk6,sk10) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_13,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 size(sk2,sk7,sk9) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_14,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 size(sk3,sk8,sk10) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_15,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 greater(sk8,sk7) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 cnf(t9_FOL_16,negated_conjecture, % 58.35/58.51 ~ greater(sk6,sk5) ). % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.51 %------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.51 % Proof found % 58.35/58.51 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.35/58.51 % SZS output start Proof % 58.35/58.51 %ClaNum:16(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.35/58.51 %VarNum:84(SingletonVarNum:27) % 58.35/58.51 %MaxLitNum:10 % 58.35/58.51 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.35/58.51 %SharedTerms:21 % 58.35/58.51 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 % 58.35/58.51 %singleGoalClaCount:12 % 58.35/58.51 [1]P1(a1,a4) % 58.35/58.51 [2]P1(a5,a2) % 58.35/58.51 [3]P2(a6,a7) % 58.35/58.51 [4]P5(a1,a4,a4) % 58.35/58.51 [5]P5(a5,a2,a2) % 58.35/58.51 [6]P6(a1,a8,a4) % 58.35/58.51 [7]P6(a5,a10,a2) % 58.35/58.51 [8]P3(a1,a9,a4) % 58.35/58.51 [9]P3(a5,a9,a2) % 58.35/58.51 [10]P7(a1,a7,a4) % 58.35/58.51 [11]P7(a5,a6,a2) % 58.35/58.51 [12]~P2(a10,a8) % 58.35/58.51 [13]~P1(x131,x132)+P4(x131,f3(x132,x131),x132) % 58.35/58.51 [15]~P4(x153,x151,x154)+~P4(x155,x152,x156)+~P5(x153,x154,x154)+~P5(x155,x156,x156)+~P6(x153,x157,x154)+~P6(x155,x158,x156)+P2(x151,x152)+~P1(x153,x154)+~P1(x155,x156)+~P2(x157,x158) % 58.35/58.51 [16]~P4(x163,x167,x164)+~P4(x165,x168,x166)+~P5(x163,x164,x164)+~P5(x165,x166,x166)+~P6(x163,x161,x164)+~P6(x165,x162,x166)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P1(x165,x166)+~P2(x167,x168) % 58.35/58.51 [14]~P4(x143,x141,x144)+~P4(x145,x142,x146)+~P3(x145,x149,x146)+~P7(x143,x147,x144)+~P7(x145,x148,x146)+P2(x141,x142)+~P1(x143,x144)+~P3(x143,x149,x144)+~P1(x145,x146)+~P2(x147,x148) % 58.35/58.51 %EqnAxiom % 58.35/58.51 % 58.35/58.51 %------------------------------------------- % 58.35/58.59 cnf(78626,plain, % 58.35/58.59 (P4(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)), % 58.35/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,13])). % 58.35/58.59 cnf(78628,plain, % 58.35/58.59 (P2(x786281,f3(a4,a1))+~P4(a5,x786281,a2)), % 58.35/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,11,9,3,2,10,8,13,14])). % 58.35/58.59 cnf(78630,plain, % 58.35/58.59 (P4(a5,f3(a2,a5),a2)), % 58.35/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,13])). % 58.35/58.59 cnf(78634,plain, % 58.35/58.59 (P2(f3(a2,a5),f3(a4,a1))), % 58.35/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,78626,3,2,10,8,13,14,78628])). % 58.35/58.59 cnf(78654,plain, % 58.35/58.59 ($false), % 58.35/58.59 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,78634,78630,78626,6,5,4,12,2,7,16]), % 58.35/58.59 ['proof']). % 58.49/58.61 % SZS output end Proof % 58.49/58.61 % Total time :58.014253s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------