%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : Princess---230619 % Problem : MGT010+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:17:19 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Theorem 7.21s 1.77s % Output : Proof 15.42s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT010+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0. % 0.00/0.04 % Command : princess -inputFormat=tptp +threads -portfolio=casc +printProof -timeoutSec=%d %s % 0.08/0.35 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu % 0.08/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.08/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.08/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.08/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.08/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.08/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.08/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:48:38 UTC 2026 % 0.08/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.12/0.37 OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM warning: Options -Xverify:none and -noverify were deprecated in JDK 13 and will likely be removed in a future release. % 0.67/0.70 ________ _____ % 0.67/0.70 ___ __ \_________(_)________________________________ % 0.67/0.70 __ /_/ /_ ___/_ /__ __ \ ___/ _ \_ ___/_ ___/ % 0.67/0.70 _ ____/_ / _ / _ / / / /__ / __/(__ )_(__ ) % 0.67/0.70 /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/ /_/\___/ \___//____/ /____/ % 0.67/0.70 % 0.67/0.71 A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic modulo Linear Integer Arithmetic % 0.67/0.71 (2023-06-19) % 0.67/0.71 % 0.67/0.71 (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2023 % 0.67/0.71 Contributors: Peter Backeman, Peter Baumgartner, Angelo Brillout, Zafer Esen, % 0.67/0.71 Amanda Stjerna. % 0.67/0.71 Free software under BSD-3-Clause. % 0.67/0.71 % 0.67/0.71 For more information, visit http://www.philipp.ruemmer.org/princess.shtml % 0.67/0.71 % 0.67/0.71 Loading /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... % 0.67/0.73 Running up to 7 provers in parallel. % 0.67/0.74 Prover 1: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1571432423 % 0.67/0.74 Prover 2: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimalAndEmpty -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1065072994 % 0.67/0.74 Prover 3: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1922548996 % 0.67/0.74 Prover 4: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1868514696 % 0.67/0.74 Prover 0: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=1042961893 % 0.67/0.74 Prover 5: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=complete -randomSeed=1259561288 % 0.67/0.74 Prover 6: Options: -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -realRatSaturationRounds=0 -ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=never -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1399714365 % 2.12/1.13 Prover 1: Preprocessing ... % 2.12/1.13 Prover 4: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.18 Prover 5: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.18 Prover 0: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.19 Prover 3: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.19 Prover 2: Preprocessing ... % 2.93/1.19 Prover 6: Preprocessing ... % 4.84/1.48 Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ... % 4.84/1.49 Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.66/1.54 Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.66/1.55 Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ... % 5.66/1.55 Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ... % 7.21/1.77 Prover 5: proved (1027ms) % 7.21/1.77 % 7.21/1.77 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 7.21/1.77 % 7.21/1.77 Prover 3: stopped % 7.21/1.78 Prover 2: stopped % 7.21/1.78 Prover 7: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-236303470 % 7.21/1.78 Prover 6: stopped % 7.21/1.78 Prover 8: Options: +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=0 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-200781089 % 7.21/1.78 Prover 10: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=919308125 % 7.21/1.79 Prover 11: Options: +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -realRatSaturationRounds=1 +ignoreQuantifiers -constructProofs=always -generateTriggers=all -randomSeed=-1509710984 % 8.02/1.84 Prover 10: Preprocessing ... % 8.02/1.86 Prover 8: Preprocessing ... % 8.02/1.86 Prover 7: Preprocessing ... % 8.02/1.88 Prover 11: Preprocessing ... % 8.76/1.96 Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.76/2.00 Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ... % 8.76/2.04 Prover 8: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers % 9.94/2.06 Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ... % 11.08/2.24 Prover 10: Found proof (size 17) % 11.08/2.24 Prover 10: proved (462ms) % 11.08/2.25 Prover 1: stopped % 11.08/2.25 Prover 7: stopped % 11.08/2.26 Prover 8: stopped % 12.52/2.47 Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ... % 13.21/2.52 Prover 4: stopped % 14.41/2.75 Prover 0: Proving ... % 14.41/2.78 Prover 0: stopped % 14.97/2.82 Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ... % 14.97/2.84 Prover 11: stopped % 14.97/2.84 % 14.97/2.84 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p % 14.97/2.84 % 14.97/2.86 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark % 14.97/2.87 Assumptions after simplification: % 14.97/2.87 --------------------------------- % 14.97/2.87 % 14.97/2.87 (a2_FOL) % 15.42/2.91 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: % 15.42/2.91 $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : ! [v9: $i] : ( ~ $i(v9) | % 15.42/2.91 ~ $i(v8) | ~ $i(v7) | ~ $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v9, v8) | ~ accountability(v1, % 15.42/2.91 v7, v3) | ~ accountability(v0, v6, v2) | ~ reliability(v1, v5, v3) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 reliability(v0, v4, v2) | ~ reproducibility(v1, v9, v3) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 reproducibility(v0, v8, v2) | ~ organization(v1, v3) | ~ organization(v0, % 15.42/2.91 v2) | greater(v7, v6)) & ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: % 15.42/2.91 $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : % 15.42/2.91 ! [v9: $i] : ( ~ $i(v9) | ~ $i(v8) | ~ $i(v7) | ~ $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v9, v8) % 15.42/2.91 | ~ accountability(v1, v7, v3) | ~ accountability(v0, v6, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 reliability(v1, v5, v3) | ~ reliability(v0, v4, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 reproducibility(v1, v9, v3) | ~ reproducibility(v0, v8, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 organization(v1, v3) | ~ organization(v0, v2) | greater(v5, v4)) & ! [v0: % 15.42/2.91 $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: $i] : % 15.42/2.91 ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : ! [v9: $i] : ( ~ $i(v9) | ~ $i(v8) % 15.42/2.91 | ~ $i(v7) | ~ $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v7, v6) | ~ greater(v5, v4) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 accountability(v1, v7, v3) | ~ accountability(v0, v6, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 reliability(v1, v5, v3) | ~ reliability(v0, v4, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 reproducibility(v1, v9, v3) | ~ reproducibility(v0, v8, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.91 organization(v1, v3) | ~ organization(v0, v2) | greater(v9, v8)) % 15.42/2.91 % 15.42/2.91 (mp3) % 15.42/2.91 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ( ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ organization(v0, v1) | % 15.42/2.91 ? [v2: $i] : ($i(v2) & reproducibility(v0, v2, v1))) % 15.42/2.91 % 15.42/2.91 (t10_FOL) % 15.42/2.92 ? [v0: $i] : ? [v1: $i] : ? [v2: $i] : ? [v3: $i] : ? [v4: $i] : ? [v5: % 15.42/2.92 $i] : ? [v6: $i] : ? [v7: $i] : ? [v8: $i] : ? [v9: $i] : ? [v10: $i] : % 15.42/2.92 ($i(v10) & $i(v9) & $i(v8) & $i(v7) & $i(v6) & $i(v5) & $i(v4) & $i(v3) & % 15.42/2.92 $i(v2) & $i(v1) & $i(v0) & size(v1, v8, v10) & size(v0, v7, v9) & class(v1, % 15.42/2.92 v2, v10) & class(v0, v2, v9) & reorganization_free(v1, v10, v10) & % 15.42/2.92 reorganization_free(v0, v9, v9) & greater(v8, v7) & accountability(v1, v6, % 15.42/2.92 v10) & accountability(v0, v5, v9) & reliability(v1, v4, v10) & % 15.42/2.92 reliability(v0, v3, v9) & organization(v1, v10) & organization(v0, v9) & ( ~ % 15.42/2.92 greater(v6, v5) | ~ greater(v4, v3))) % 15.42/2.92 % 15.42/2.92 (t9_FOL) % 15.42/2.92 ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : ! [v5: % 15.42/2.92 $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : ( ~ $i(v8) | ~ $i(v7) | ~ % 15.42/2.92 $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ % 15.42/2.92 $i(v0) | ~ size(v1, v6, v8) | ~ size(v0, v5, v7) | ~ class(v1, v2, v8) | % 15.42/2.92 ~ class(v0, v2, v7) | ~ reorganization_free(v1, v8, v8) | ~ % 15.42/2.92 reorganization_free(v0, v7, v7) | ~ greater(v6, v5) | ~ % 15.42/2.92 reproducibility(v1, v4, v8) | ~ reproducibility(v0, v3, v7) | ~ % 15.42/2.92 organization(v1, v8) | ~ organization(v0, v7) | greater(v4, v3)) % 15.42/2.92 % 15.42/2.92 Those formulas are unsatisfiable: % 15.42/2.92 --------------------------------- % 15.42/2.92 % 15.42/2.92 Begin of proof % 15.42/2.92 | % 15.42/2.92 | ALPHA: (a2_FOL) implies: % 15.42/2.93 | (1) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : % 15.42/2.93 | ! [v5: $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : ! [v9: $i] : ( % 15.42/2.93 | ~ $i(v9) | ~ $i(v8) | ~ $i(v7) | ~ $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) % 15.42/2.93 | | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v9, v8) % 15.42/2.93 | | ~ accountability(v1, v7, v3) | ~ accountability(v0, v6, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.93 | reliability(v1, v5, v3) | ~ reliability(v0, v4, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.93 | reproducibility(v1, v9, v3) | ~ reproducibility(v0, v8, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.93 | organization(v1, v3) | ~ organization(v0, v2) | greater(v5, v4)) % 15.42/2.93 | (2) ! [v0: $i] : ! [v1: $i] : ! [v2: $i] : ! [v3: $i] : ! [v4: $i] : % 15.42/2.93 | ! [v5: $i] : ! [v6: $i] : ! [v7: $i] : ! [v8: $i] : ! [v9: $i] : ( % 15.42/2.93 | ~ $i(v9) | ~ $i(v8) | ~ $i(v7) | ~ $i(v6) | ~ $i(v5) | ~ $i(v4) % 15.42/2.93 | | ~ $i(v3) | ~ $i(v2) | ~ $i(v1) | ~ $i(v0) | ~ greater(v9, v8) % 15.42/2.93 | | ~ accountability(v1, v7, v3) | ~ accountability(v0, v6, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.93 | reliability(v1, v5, v3) | ~ reliability(v0, v4, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.93 | reproducibility(v1, v9, v3) | ~ reproducibility(v0, v8, v2) | ~ % 15.42/2.93 | organization(v1, v3) | ~ organization(v0, v2) | greater(v7, v6)) % 15.42/2.93 | % 15.42/2.93 | DELTA: instantiating (t10_FOL) with fresh symbols all_5_0, all_5_1, all_5_2, % 15.42/2.93 | all_5_3, all_5_4, all_5_5, all_5_6, all_5_7, all_5_8, all_5_9, all_5_10 % 15.42/2.93 | gives: % 15.42/2.94 | (3) $i(all_5_0) & $i(all_5_1) & $i(all_5_2) & $i(all_5_3) & $i(all_5_4) & % 15.42/2.94 | $i(all_5_5) & $i(all_5_6) & $i(all_5_7) & $i(all_5_8) & $i(all_5_9) & % 15.42/2.94 | $i(all_5_10) & size(all_5_9, all_5_2, all_5_0) & size(all_5_10, % 15.42/2.94 | all_5_3, all_5_1) & class(all_5_9, all_5_8, all_5_0) & % 15.42/2.94 | class(all_5_10, all_5_8, all_5_1) & reorganization_free(all_5_9, % 15.42/2.94 | all_5_0, all_5_0) & reorganization_free(all_5_10, all_5_1, all_5_1) & % 15.42/2.94 | greater(all_5_2, all_5_3) & accountability(all_5_9, all_5_4, all_5_0) & % 15.42/2.94 | accountability(all_5_10, all_5_5, all_5_1) & reliability(all_5_9, % 15.42/2.94 | all_5_6, all_5_0) & reliability(all_5_10, all_5_7, all_5_1) & % 15.42/2.94 | organization(all_5_9, all_5_0) & organization(all_5_10, all_5_1) & ( ~ % 15.42/2.94 | greater(all_5_4, all_5_5) | ~ greater(all_5_6, all_5_7)) % 15.42/2.94 | % 15.42/2.94 | ALPHA: (3) implies: % 15.42/2.94 | (4) organization(all_5_10, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.94 | (5) organization(all_5_9, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.94 | (6) reliability(all_5_10, all_5_7, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.94 | (7) reliability(all_5_9, all_5_6, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.94 | (8) accountability(all_5_10, all_5_5, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.94 | (9) accountability(all_5_9, all_5_4, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.94 | (10) greater(all_5_2, all_5_3) % 15.42/2.94 | (11) reorganization_free(all_5_10, all_5_1, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.94 | (12) reorganization_free(all_5_9, all_5_0, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.94 | (13) class(all_5_10, all_5_8, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.94 | (14) class(all_5_9, all_5_8, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.94 | (15) size(all_5_10, all_5_3, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.94 | (16) size(all_5_9, all_5_2, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.94 | (17) $i(all_5_10) % 15.42/2.94 | (18) $i(all_5_9) % 15.42/2.94 | (19) $i(all_5_8) % 15.42/2.95 | (20) $i(all_5_7) % 15.42/2.95 | (21) $i(all_5_6) % 15.42/2.95 | (22) $i(all_5_5) % 15.42/2.95 | (23) $i(all_5_4) % 15.42/2.95 | (24) $i(all_5_3) % 15.42/2.95 | (25) $i(all_5_2) % 15.42/2.95 | (26) $i(all_5_1) % 15.42/2.95 | (27) $i(all_5_0) % 15.42/2.95 | (28) ~ greater(all_5_4, all_5_5) | ~ greater(all_5_6, all_5_7) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.95 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (mp3) with all_5_10, all_5_1, simplifying with (4), % 15.42/2.95 | (17), (26) gives: % 15.42/2.95 | (29) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & reproducibility(all_5_10, v0, all_5_1)) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.95 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (mp3) with all_5_9, all_5_0, simplifying with (5), % 15.42/2.95 | (18), (27) gives: % 15.42/2.95 | (30) ? [v0: $i] : ($i(v0) & reproducibility(all_5_9, v0, all_5_0)) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.95 | DELTA: instantiating (30) with fresh symbol all_12_0 gives: % 15.42/2.95 | (31) $i(all_12_0) & reproducibility(all_5_9, all_12_0, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.95 | ALPHA: (31) implies: % 15.42/2.95 | (32) reproducibility(all_5_9, all_12_0, all_5_0) % 15.42/2.95 | (33) $i(all_12_0) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.95 | DELTA: instantiating (29) with fresh symbol all_14_0 gives: % 15.42/2.95 | (34) $i(all_14_0) & reproducibility(all_5_10, all_14_0, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.95 | ALPHA: (34) implies: % 15.42/2.95 | (35) reproducibility(all_5_10, all_14_0, all_5_1) % 15.42/2.95 | (36) $i(all_14_0) % 15.42/2.95 | % 15.42/2.96 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (t9_FOL) with all_5_10, all_5_9, all_5_8, all_14_0, % 15.42/2.96 | all_12_0, all_5_3, all_5_2, all_5_1, all_5_0, simplifying with % 15.42/2.96 | (4), (5), (10), (11), (12), (13), (14), (15), (16), (17), (18), % 15.42/2.96 | (19), (24), (25), (26), (27), (32), (33), (35), (36) gives: % 15.42/2.96 | (37) greater(all_12_0, all_14_0) % 15.42/2.96 | % 15.42/2.96 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (2) with all_5_10, all_5_9, all_5_1, all_5_0, % 15.42/2.96 | all_5_7, all_5_6, all_5_5, all_5_4, all_14_0, all_12_0, % 15.42/2.96 | simplifying with (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (17), (18), (20), % 15.42/2.96 | (21), (22), (23), (26), (27), (32), (33), (35), (36), (37) gives: % 15.42/2.96 | (38) greater(all_5_4, all_5_5) % 15.42/2.96 | % 15.42/2.97 | GROUND_INST: instantiating (1) with all_5_10, all_5_9, all_5_1, all_5_0, % 15.42/2.97 | all_5_7, all_5_6, all_5_5, all_5_4, all_14_0, all_12_0, % 15.42/2.97 | simplifying with (4), (5), (6), (7), (8), (9), (17), (18), (20), % 15.42/2.97 | (21), (22), (23), (26), (27), (32), (33), (35), (36), (37) gives: % 15.42/2.97 | (39) greater(all_5_6, all_5_7) % 15.42/2.97 | % 15.42/2.97 | BETA: splitting (28) gives: % 15.42/2.97 | % 15.42/2.97 | Case 1: % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | | (40) ~ greater(all_5_4, all_5_5) % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | | PRED_UNIFY: (38), (40) imply: % 15.42/2.97 | | (41) $false % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | | CLOSE: (41) is inconsistent. % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | Case 2: % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | | (42) ~ greater(all_5_6, all_5_7) % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | | PRED_UNIFY: (39), (42) imply: % 15.42/2.97 | | (43) $false % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | | CLOSE: (43) is inconsistent. % 15.42/2.97 | | % 15.42/2.97 | End of split % 15.42/2.97 | % 15.42/2.97 End of proof % 15.42/2.97 % SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark % 15.42/2.97 % 15.42/2.97 2263ms %------------------------------------------------------------------------------