%------------------------------------------------------------------------------ % File : CSE---1.7 % Problem : MGT010-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % Transfm : none % Format : tptp:raw % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz % Memory : 8046.5625MB % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % CPULimit : 300s % WCLimit : 300s % DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:15 AM UTC 2026 % Result : Unsatisfiable 58.38s 58.57s % Output : Assurance 0s % Verified : % SZS Type : - % Comments : %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----No solution output by system %------------------------------------------------------------------------------ %----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT % 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT010-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 0.09/0.35 % Computer : n013.cluster.edu % 0.09/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 % 0.09/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz % 0.09/0.35 % Memory : 8046.5625MB % 0.09/0.35 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic % 0.09/0.35 % CPULimit : 300 % 0.09/0.35 % WCLimit : 300 % 0.09/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 11:47:35 UTC 2026 % 0.09/0.35 % CPUTime : % 0.24/0.52 start to proof:theBenchmark % 58.38/58.56 %------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.56 % File :CSE---1.7 % 58.38/58.56 % Problem :theBenchmark % 58.38/58.56 % Transform :cnf % 58.38/58.56 % Format :tptp:raw % 58.38/58.56 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 % Result :Theorem 58.046247s % 58.38/58.56 % Output :CNFRefutation 58.046247s % 58.38/58.56 %------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.56 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.56 % File : MGT010-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0. % 58.38/58.56 % Domain : Management (Organisation Theory) % 58.38/58.56 % Problem : Large organization have higher reliability and accountability % 58.38/58.56 % Version : [PB+94] axioms. % 58.38/58.56 % English : Large organization have higher reliability and accountability % 58.38/58.56 % than small organizations (of the same class). % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 % Refs : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.38/58.56 % : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing % 58.38/58.56 % : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe % 58.38/58.56 % Source : [TPTP] % 58.38/58.56 % Names : % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 % Status : Unsatisfiable % 58.38/58.56 % Rating : 0.00 v5.4.0, 0.06 v5.3.0, 0.10 v5.2.0, 0.00 v2.4.0 % 58.38/58.56 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 19 ( 13 unt; 0 nHn; 19 RR) % 58.38/58.56 % Number of literals : 60 ( 0 equ; 42 neg) % 58.38/58.56 % Maximal clause size : 12 ( 3 avg) % 58.38/58.56 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg) % 58.38/58.56 % Number of predicates : 8 ( 8 usr; 0 prp; 2-3 aty) % 58.38/58.56 % Number of functors : 12 ( 12 usr; 11 con; 0-2 aty) % 58.38/58.56 % Number of variables : 41 ( 4 sgn) % 58.38/58.56 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_HRN % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT010+1.p % 58.38/58.56 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.56 cnf(mp3_1,axiom, % 58.38/58.56 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.56 | reproducibility(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ). % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 cnf(a2_FOL_2,hypothesis, % 58.38/58.56 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ greater(J,I) % 58.38/58.56 | greater(F,E) ) ). % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 cnf(a2_FOL_3,hypothesis, % 58.38/58.56 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ greater(J,I) % 58.38/58.56 | greater(H,G) ) ). % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 cnf(a2_FOL_4,hypothesis, % 58.38/58.56 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reliability(A,E,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reliability(C,F,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ accountability(A,G,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ accountability(C,H,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(A,I,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(C,J,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ greater(F,E) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ greater(H,G) % 58.38/58.56 | greater(J,I) ) ). % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 cnf(t9_FOL_5,hypothesis, % 58.38/58.56 ( ~ organization(A,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ organization(C,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reorganization_free(C,D,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ class(A,E,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ class(C,E,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(A,F,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ reproducibility(C,G,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ size(A,H,B) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ size(C,I,D) % 58.38/58.56 | ~ greater(I,H) % 58.38/58.56 | greater(G,F) ) ). % 58.38/58.56 % 58.38/58.56 cnf(t10_FOL_6,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 organization(sk2,sk11) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_7,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 organization(sk3,sk12) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_8,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 reorganization_free(sk2,sk11,sk11) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_9,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 reorganization_free(sk3,sk12,sk12) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_10,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 class(sk2,sk4,sk11) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_11,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 class(sk3,sk4,sk12) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_12,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 reliability(sk2,sk5,sk11) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_13,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 reliability(sk3,sk6,sk12) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_14,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 accountability(sk2,sk7,sk11) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_15,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 accountability(sk3,sk8,sk12) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_16,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 size(sk2,sk9,sk11) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_17,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 size(sk3,sk10,sk12) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_18,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 greater(sk10,sk9) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 cnf(t10_FOL_19,negated_conjecture, % 58.38/58.57 ( ~ greater(sk6,sk5) % 58.38/58.57 | ~ greater(sk8,sk7) ) ). % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 %-------------------------------------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.57 %------------------------------------------- % 58.38/58.57 % Proof found % 58.38/58.57 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark % 58.38/58.57 % SZS output start Proof % 58.38/58.57 %ClaNum:19(EqnAxiom:0) % 58.38/58.57 %VarNum:118(SingletonVarNum:41) % 58.38/58.57 %MaxLitNum:12 % 58.38/58.57 %MaxfuncDepth:1 % 58.38/58.57 %SharedTerms:26 % 58.38/58.57 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 % 58.38/58.57 %singleGoalClaCount:13 % 58.38/58.57 [1]P1(a1,a2) % 58.38/58.57 [2]P1(a6,a5) % 58.38/58.57 [3]P2(a3,a7) % 58.38/58.57 [4]P5(a1,a8,a2) % 58.38/58.57 [5]P5(a6,a10,a5) % 58.38/58.57 [6]P3(a1,a11,a2) % 58.38/58.57 [7]P3(a6,a12,a5) % 58.38/58.57 [8]P6(a1,a2,a2) % 58.38/58.57 [9]P6(a6,a5,a5) % 58.38/58.57 [10]P4(a1,a9,a2) % 58.38/58.57 [11]P4(a6,a9,a5) % 58.38/58.57 [12]P7(a1,a7,a2) % 58.38/58.57 [13]P7(a6,a3,a5) % 58.38/58.57 [14]~P2(a10,a8)+~P2(a12,a11) % 58.38/58.57 [15]~P1(x151,x152)+P8(x151,f4(x152,x151),x152) % 58.38/58.57 [16]~P8(x163,x167,x164)+~P8(x165,x168,x166)+~P3(x163,x161,x164)+~P3(x165,x162,x166)+P2(x161,x162)+~P1(x163,x164)+~P5(x163,x169,x164)+~P1(x165,x166)+~P5(x165,x1610,x166)+~P2(x167,x168) % 58.38/58.57 [17]~P8(x173,x177,x174)+~P8(x175,x178,x176)+~P5(x173,x171,x174)+~P5(x175,x172,x176)+P2(x171,x172)+~P1(x173,x174)+~P3(x173,x179,x174)+~P1(x175,x176)+~P3(x175,x1710,x176)+~P2(x177,x178) % 58.38/58.57 [18]~P8(x183,x181,x184)+~P8(x185,x182,x186)+~P5(x183,x189,x184)+~P5(x185,x1810,x186)+~P3(x183,x187,x184)+~P3(x185,x188,x186)+P2(x181,x182)+~P1(x183,x184)+~P1(x185,x186)+~P2(x187,x188)+~P2(x189,x1810) % 58.38/58.57 [19]~P8(x193,x191,x194)+~P8(x195,x192,x196)+~P6(x193,x194,x194)+~P6(x195,x196,x196)+~P4(x195,x199,x196)+~P7(x193,x197,x194)+~P7(x195,x198,x196)+P2(x191,x192)+~P1(x193,x194)+~P4(x193,x199,x194)+~P1(x195,x196)+~P2(x197,x198) % 58.38/58.57 %EqnAxiom % 58.38/58.57 % 58.38/58.57 %------------------------------------------- % 58.53/58.65 cnf(115,plain, % 58.53/58.65 (P2(x1151,f4(a2,a1))+~P8(a6,x1151,a5)), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,9,8,2,11,3,10,13,12,15,19])). % 58.53/58.65 cnf(147,plain, % 58.53/58.65 (P2(f4(a5,a6),f4(a2,a1))), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,15,115])). % 58.53/58.65 cnf(86320,plain, % 58.53/58.65 (P8(a1,f4(a2,a1),a2)), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,15])). % 58.53/58.65 cnf(86327,plain, % 58.53/58.65 (P8(a6,f4(a5,a6),a5)), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,15])). % 58.53/58.65 cnf(86329,plain, % 58.53/58.65 (P2(a10,a8)), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,86320,4,6,5,7,147,2,15,17])). % 58.53/58.65 cnf(86333,plain, % 58.53/58.65 (~P2(a12,a11)), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[86329,14])). % 58.53/58.65 cnf(86381,plain, % 58.53/58.65 ($false), % 58.53/58.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[1,86327,86333,86320,6,7,5,4,147,2,16]), % 58.53/58.65 ['proof']). % 58.53/58.68 % SZS output end Proof % 58.53/58.68 % Total time :58.046247s %------------------------------------------------------------------------------