↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : MGT011-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:04:15 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 58.37s 58.56s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem    : MGT011-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 11:49:30 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.28/0.50  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 58.37/58.55  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.55  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 58.37/58.55  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 58.37/58.55  % Transform   :cnf
% 58.37/58.55  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 58.37/58.55  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 58.37/58.55  
% 58.37/58.55  % Result      :Theorem 58.057754s
% 58.37/58.55  % Output      :CNFRefutation 58.057754s
% 58.37/58.56  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.56  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.56  % File     : MGT011-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 58.37/58.56  % Domain   : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 58.37/58.56  % Problem  : Organizational size cannot decrease without reorganization
% 58.37/58.56  % Version  : [PB+94] axioms.
% 58.37/58.56  % English  :
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  % Refs     : [PB+92] Peli et al. (1992), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 58.37/58.56  %          : [PB+94] Peli et al. (1994), A Logical Approach to Formalizing
% 58.37/58.56  %          : [Kam94] Kamps (1994), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 58.37/58.56  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 58.37/58.56  % Names    :
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 58.37/58.56  % Rating   : 0.00 v9.1.0, 0.08 v9.0.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.20 v6.0.0, 0.22 v5.5.0, 0.12 v5.4.0, 0.13 v5.3.0, 0.17 v5.2.0, 0.25 v5.1.0, 0.29 v5.0.0, 0.14 v4.1.0, 0.11 v4.0.1, 0.17 v4.0.0, 0.33 v3.5.0, 0.17 v3.3.0, 0.00 v3.1.0, 0.11 v2.7.0, 0.00 v2.4.0
% 58.37/58.56  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   14 (   7 unt;   0 nHn;  14 RR)
% 58.37/58.56  %            Number of literals    :   38 (   2 equ;  26 neg)
% 58.37/58.56  %            Maximal clause size   :   10 (   2 avg)
% 58.37/58.56  %            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
% 58.37/58.56  %            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   0 prp; 2-3 aty)
% 58.37/58.56  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
% 58.37/58.56  %            Number of variables   :   27 (   0 sgn)
% 58.37/58.56  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_HRN
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT011+1.p
% 58.37/58.56  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(mp5_20,axiom,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | inertia(A,sk1(B,A),B) ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(mp6_1_21,axiom,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | A != B ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(mp6_2_22,axiom,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ greater(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ greater(B,A) ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(mp9_23,axiom,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | class(A,sk2(B,A),B) ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(mp10_24,axiom,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ organization(A,C)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ class(A,D,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ class(A,E,C)
% 58.37/58.56      | D = E ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(a5_FOL_25,hypothesis,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ organization(C,D)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ class(A,E,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ class(C,E,D)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ size(A,F,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ size(C,G,D)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ inertia(A,H,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ inertia(C,I,D)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ greater(G,F)
% 58.37/58.56      | greater(I,H) ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t2_FOL_26,hypothesis,
% 58.37/58.56      ( ~ organization(A,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ organization(A,C)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ reorganization_free(A,B,C)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ inertia(A,D,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ inertia(A,E,C)
% 58.37/58.56      | ~ greater(C,B)
% 58.37/58.56      | greater(E,D) ) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_27,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      organization(sk3,sk6) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_28,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      organization(sk3,sk7) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_29,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      reorganization_free(sk3,sk6,sk7) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_30,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      size(sk3,sk4,sk6) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_31,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      size(sk3,sk5,sk7) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_32,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      greater(sk7,sk6) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  cnf(t11_FOL_33,negated_conjecture,
% 58.37/58.56      greater(sk4,sk5) ).
% 58.37/58.56  
% 58.37/58.56  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.56  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.56  % Proof found
% 58.37/58.56  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 58.37/58.56  % SZS output start Proof
% 58.37/58.56  %ClaNum:37(EqnAxiom:23)
% 58.37/58.56  %VarNum:78(SingletonVarNum:27)
% 58.37/58.56  %MaxLitNum:10
% 58.37/58.56  %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 58.37/58.56  %SharedTerms:12
% 58.37/58.56  %goalClause: 24 25 26 27 28 29 30
% 58.37/58.56  %singleGoalClaCount:7
% 58.37/58.56  [24]P1(a1,a4)
% 58.37/58.56  [25]P1(a1,a7)
% 58.37/58.56  [26]P2(a7,a4)
% 58.37/58.56  [27]P2(a5,a6)
% 58.37/58.56  [28]P5(a1,a4,a7)
% 58.37/58.56  [29]P6(a1,a5,a4)
% 58.37/58.56  [30]P6(a1,a6,a7)
% 58.37/58.57  [31]~P2(x311,x312)+~E(x311,x312)
% 58.37/58.57  [32]~P2(x322,x321)+~P2(x321,x322)
% 58.37/58.57  [33]~P1(x331,x332)+P4(x331,f2(x332,x331),x332)
% 58.37/58.57  [34]~P1(x341,x342)+P3(x341,f3(x342,x341),x342)
% 58.37/58.57  [35]~P3(x353,x352,x354)+~P3(x353,x351,x355)+~P5(x353,x355,x354)+E(x351,x352)+~P1(x353,x354)+~P1(x353,x355)
% 58.37/58.57  [36]~P2(x364,x365)+~P4(x363,x361,x364)+~P4(x363,x362,x365)+~P5(x363,x365,x364)+P2(x361,x362)+~P1(x363,x364)+~P1(x363,x365)
% 58.37/58.57  [37]~P4(x373,x371,x374)+~P4(x375,x372,x376)+~P3(x375,x379,x376)+~P6(x373,x377,x374)+~P6(x375,x378,x376)+P2(x371,x372)+~P1(x373,x374)+~P3(x373,x379,x374)+~P1(x375,x376)+~P2(x377,x378)
% 58.37/58.57  %EqnAxiom
% 58.37/58.57  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 58.37/58.57  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 58.37/58.57  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 58.37/58.57  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41,x43),f2(x42,x43))
% 58.37/58.57  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f2(x53,x51),f2(x53,x52))
% 58.37/58.57  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f3(x61,x63),f3(x62,x63))
% 58.37/58.57  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f3(x73,x71),f3(x73,x72))
% 58.37/58.57  [8]P1(x82,x83)+~E(x81,x82)+~P1(x81,x83)
% 58.37/58.57  [9]P1(x93,x92)+~E(x91,x92)+~P1(x93,x91)
% 58.37/58.57  [10]P6(x102,x103,x104)+~E(x101,x102)+~P6(x101,x103,x104)
% 58.37/58.57  [11]P6(x113,x112,x114)+~E(x111,x112)+~P6(x113,x111,x114)
% 58.37/58.57  [12]P6(x123,x124,x122)+~E(x121,x122)+~P6(x123,x124,x121)
% 58.37/58.57  [13]P2(x132,x133)+~E(x131,x132)+~P2(x131,x133)
% 58.37/58.57  [14]P2(x143,x142)+~E(x141,x142)+~P2(x143,x141)
% 58.37/58.57  [15]P4(x152,x153,x154)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x151,x153,x154)
% 58.37/58.57  [16]P4(x163,x162,x164)+~E(x161,x162)+~P4(x163,x161,x164)
% 58.37/58.57  [17]P4(x173,x174,x172)+~E(x171,x172)+~P4(x173,x174,x171)
% 58.37/58.57  [18]P5(x182,x183,x184)+~E(x181,x182)+~P5(x181,x183,x184)
% 58.37/58.57  [19]P5(x193,x192,x194)+~E(x191,x192)+~P5(x193,x191,x194)
% 58.37/58.57  [20]P5(x203,x204,x202)+~E(x201,x202)+~P5(x203,x204,x201)
% 58.37/58.57  [21]P3(x212,x213,x214)+~E(x211,x212)+~P3(x211,x213,x214)
% 58.37/58.57  [22]P3(x223,x222,x224)+~E(x221,x222)+~P3(x223,x221,x224)
% 58.37/58.57  [23]P3(x233,x234,x232)+~E(x231,x232)+~P3(x233,x234,x231)
% 58.37/58.57  
% 58.37/58.57  %-------------------------------------------
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(38,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (~P2(x381,x381)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(equality_inference,[],[31])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(42,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (~P2(x421,x421)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(rename_variables,[],[38])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(45,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P1(x451,a4)+~E(a1,x451)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,26,38,42,32,13,14,8])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(75,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P1(a1,x751)+~E(a7,x751)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[25,9])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(240,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P3(x2401,f3(a4,x2401),a4)+~E(a1,x2401)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[34,45])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(241,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P3(a1,f3(a4,a1),a4)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(equality_inference,[],[240])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(245,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P3(a1,x2451,a4)+~E(f3(a4,a1),x2451)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[241,21,22])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(1278,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P4(x12781,f2(a4,x12781),a4)+~E(a1,x12781)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,33])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(1279,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P4(a1,f2(a4,a1),a4)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(equality_inference,[],[1278])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(1461,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (~E(x14611,x14612)+~E(a1,x14611)+P1(x14612,a4)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[45,3])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(1972,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P4(a1,f2(x19721,a1),x19721)+~E(a7,x19721)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[75,33])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(1973,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P4(a1,f2(a7,a1),a7)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(equality_inference,[],[1972])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(2294,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P3(a1,f3(x22941,a1),x22941)+~E(a7,x22941)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[75,34])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(2295,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P3(a1,f3(a7,a1),a7)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(equality_inference,[],[2294])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(10948,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (~P2(f2(a4,a1),f2(a7,a1))),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,1973,1279,2295,28,25,241,26,35,36,245,2,32])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(10951,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     (P3(a1,f3(a4,a1),a7)),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,1973,1279,2295,28,25,241,26,35,36,245,2,32,1461,22])).
% 58.37/58.57  cnf(10967,plain,
% 58.37/58.57     ($false),
% 58.37/58.57     inference(scs_inference,[],[24,10948,10951,1973,1279,29,30,25,241,27,37]),
% 58.37/58.57     ['proof']).
% 58.37/58.57  % SZS output end Proof
% 58.37/58.57  % Total time :58.057754s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------