↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT012+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:27:08 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  159 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  188 (  75   ~;  66   |;  39   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   20 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  110 (   0 sgn  65   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t12_FOL,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X8,X9,X6,X7] :
      ( ( greater(X7,X6)
        & complexity(X1,X9,X7)
        & complexity(X1,X8,X6)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X6,X7)
        & organization(X1,X7)
        & organization(X1,X6) )
     => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_FOL) ).

fof(mp10,axiom,
    ! [X1,X6,X7,X8,X9] :
      ( ( class(X1,X9,X7)
        & class(X1,X8,X6)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X6,X7)
        & organization(X1,X7)
        & organization(X1,X6) )
     => X8 = X9 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp10) ).

fof(mp9,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X5] : class(X1,X5,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp9) ).

fof(a12_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X4,X5,X8,X9,X10,X11,X6,X7] :
      ( ( greater(X9,X8)
        & inertia(X4,X11,X7)
        & inertia(X1,X10,X6)
        & complexity(X4,X9,X7)
        & complexity(X1,X8,X6)
        & class(X4,X5,X7)
        & class(X1,X5,X6)
        & organization(X4,X7)
        & organization(X1,X6) )
     => greater(X11,X10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a12_FOL) ).

fof(t2_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X10,X11,X6,X7] :
      ( ( greater(X7,X6)
        & inertia(X1,X11,X7)
        & inertia(X1,X10,X6)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X6,X7)
        & organization(X1,X7)
        & organization(X1,X6) )
     => greater(X11,X10) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t2_FOL) ).

fof(mp5,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( organization(X1,X2)
     => ? [X3] : inertia(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp5) ).

fof(mp6_2,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4] :
      ~ ( greater(X4,X1)
        & greater(X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp6_2) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X8,X9,X6,X7] :
        ( ( greater(X7,X6)
          & complexity(X1,X9,X7)
          & complexity(X1,X8,X6)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X6,X7)
          & organization(X1,X7)
          & organization(X1,X6) )
       => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t12_FOL]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X8,X9,X6,X7] :
        ( ( greater(X7,X6)
          & complexity(X1,X9,X7)
          & complexity(X1,X8,X6)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X6,X7)
          & organization(X1,X7)
          & organization(X1,X6) )
       => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24,X25,X26] :
      ( X25 = X26
      | ~ class(X22,X26,X24)
      | ~ class(X22,X25,X23)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X22,X23,X24)
      | ~ organization(X22,X24)
      | ~ organization(X22,X23) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(esk4_0,esk5_0)
    & greater(esk7_0,esk6_0)
    & complexity(esk3_0,esk5_0,esk7_0)
    & complexity(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk6_0)
    & reorganization_free(esk3_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)
    & organization(esk3_0,esk7_0)
    & organization(esk3_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X19,X20] :
      ( class(X19,esk2_2(X19,X20),X20)
      | ~ organization(X19,X20) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp9])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ class(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ class(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | X4 = X5 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    reorganization_free(esk3_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk3_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk3_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | class(X1,esk2_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

fof(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    ! [X27,X28,X29,X30,X31,X32,X33,X34,X35] :
      ( greater(X33,X32)
      | ~ greater(X31,X30)
      | ~ inertia(X28,X33,X35)
      | ~ inertia(X27,X32,X34)
      | ~ complexity(X28,X31,X35)
      | ~ complexity(X27,X30,X34)
      | ~ class(X28,X29,X35)
      | ~ class(X27,X29,X34)
      | ~ organization(X28,X35)
      | ~ organization(X27,X34) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a12_FOL])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ class(esk3_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ class(esk3_0,X2,esk7_0)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    class(esk3_0,esk2_2(esk3_0,esk7_0),esk7_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    ! [X36,X37,X38,X39,X40] :
      ( greater(X38,X37)
      | ~ greater(X40,X39)
      | ~ inertia(X36,X38,X40)
      | ~ inertia(X36,X37,X39)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X36,X39,X40)
      | ~ organization(X36,X40)
      | ~ organization(X36,X39) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[t2_FOL])])]) ).

fof(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X12,X13] :
      ( inertia(X12,esk1_2(X12,X13),X13)
      | ~ organization(X12,X13) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp5])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X7,X6)
    | ~ inertia(X3,X9,X4)
    | ~ inertia(X1,X8,X2)
    | ~ complexity(X3,X7,X4)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X6,X2)
    | ~ class(X3,X5,X4)
    | ~ class(X1,X5,X2)
    | ~ organization(X3,X4)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | greater(X9,X8) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(esk3_0,esk4_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ class(esk3_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | X1 = esk2_2(esk3_0,esk7_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    class(esk3_0,esk2_2(esk3_0,esk6_0),esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ inertia(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ inertia(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | greater(X5,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    greater(esk7_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | inertia(X1,esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ organization(X3,X5)
    | ~ inertia(X3,X2,X5)
    | ~ inertia(esk3_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ greater(esk4_0,X4)
    | ~ class(X3,X6,X5)
    | ~ class(esk3_0,X6,esk6_0)
    | ~ complexity(X3,X4,X5)
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(esk3_0,esk5_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    greater(esk4_0,esk5_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    esk2_2(esk3_0,esk7_0) = esk2_2(esk3_0,esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inertia(esk3_0,X2,esk6_0)
    | ~ inertia(esk3_0,X1,esk7_0)
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_13]),c_0_27]),c_0_14]),c_0_15])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    inertia(esk3_0,esk1_2(esk3_0,esk7_0),esk7_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inertia(esk3_0,X2,esk7_0)
    | ~ inertia(esk3_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | ~ class(esk3_0,X3,esk7_0)
    | ~ class(esk3_0,X3,esk6_0)
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]),c_0_14])]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    class(esk3_0,esk2_2(esk3_0,esk6_0),esk7_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_32]) ).

fof(c_0_37,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] :
      ( ~ greater(X18,X17)
      | ~ greater(X17,X18) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp6_2])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inertia(esk3_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | greater(esk1_2(esk3_0,esk7_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    inertia(esk3_0,esk1_2(esk3_0,esk6_0),esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inertia(esk3_0,X2,esk7_0)
    | ~ inertia(esk3_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_25]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( ~ greater(X2,X1)
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    greater(esk1_2(esk3_0,esk7_0),esk1_2(esk3_0,esk6_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ inertia(esk3_0,X1,esk7_0)
    | greater(esk1_2(esk3_0,esk6_0),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(esk1_2(esk3_0,esk6_0),esk1_2(esk3_0,esk7_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_34]),c_0_44]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT012+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:21:26 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.35  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.41  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 3946491 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.41  % Search class: FHHSF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % new_bool_1 with pid 3946499 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.14/0.41  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.41  % Search class: FHHSF-FFSM22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.41  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.41  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.41  % Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 0.14/0.41  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Initial clauses                      : 14
% 0.14/0.41  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 14
% 0.14/0.41  % Processed clauses                    : 52
% 0.14/0.41  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % ...subsumed                          : 3
% 0.14/0.41  % ...remaining for further processing  : 49
% 0.14/0.41  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 1
% 0.14/0.41  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.14/0.41  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 0.14/0.41  % Generated clauses                    : 24
% 0.14/0.41  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 25
% 0.14/0.41  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Paramodulations                      : 23
% 0.14/0.41  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Equation resolutions                 : 1
% 0.14/0.41  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Total rewrite steps                  : 15
% 0.14/0.41  % ...of those cached                   : 9
% 0.14/0.41  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of processed clauses  : 31
% 0.14/0.41  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 13
% 0.14/0.41  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.41  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 0.14/0.41  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 14
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1
% 0.14/0.41  % ...number of literals in the above   : 5
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Current number of archived clauses   : 17
% 0.14/0.41  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 188
% 0.14/0.41  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 19
% 0.14/0.41  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.14/0.41  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.14/0.41  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.14/0.41  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.14/0.41  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.41  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1985
% 0.14/0.41  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 332
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.14/0.41  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages
% 0.14/0.41  
% 0.14/0.41  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.41  % User time                : 0.019 s
% 0.14/0.41  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Total time               : 0.030 s
% 0.14/0.41  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------