↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.11s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   54 (  19 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  190 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  217 (  81   ~;  70   |;  55   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   17 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  115 (   1 sgn  79   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(t14_FOL,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X8,X9,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( ( greater(X7,X6)
        & size(X1,X7,X5)
        & size(X1,X6,X4)
        & complexity(X1,X9,X5)
        & complexity(X1,X8,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & organization(X1,X4) )
     => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL) ).

fof(t11_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( ( greater(X5,X4)
        & size(X1,X7,X5)
        & size(X1,X6,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & organization(X1,X4) )
     => ~ greater(X6,X7) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t11_FOL) ).

fof(mp15,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3] :
      ( organization(X1,X3)
     => time(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp15) ).

fof(mp17,axiom,
    ! [X1,X4,X5] :
      ( reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
     => reorganization_free(X1,X5,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp17) ).

fof(mp16,axiom,
    ! [X4,X5] :
      ( ( time(X5)
        & time(X4) )
     => ( greater(X5,X4)
        | X4 = X5
        | greater(X4,X5) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp16) ).

fof(t12_FOL,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X8,X9,X4,X5] :
      ( ( greater(X5,X4)
        & complexity(X1,X9,X5)
        & complexity(X1,X8,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & organization(X1,X4) )
     => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_FOL) ).

fof(mp19,axiom,
    ! [X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( ( X4 = X5
        & size(X1,X7,X5)
        & size(X1,X6,X4)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & organization(X1,X4) )
     => X6 = X7 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp19) ).

fof(mp6_1,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ~ ( X1 = X2
        & greater(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp6_1) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X8,X9,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
        ( ( greater(X7,X6)
          & size(X1,X7,X5)
          & size(X1,X6,X4)
          & complexity(X1,X9,X5)
          & complexity(X1,X8,X4)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & organization(X1,X4) )
       => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[t14_FOL]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X8,X9,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
        ( ( greater(X7,X6)
          & size(X1,X7,X5)
          & size(X1,X6,X4)
          & complexity(X1,X9,X5)
          & complexity(X1,X8,X4)
          & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
          & organization(X1,X5)
          & organization(X1,X4) )
       => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X6,X7,X4,X5] :
      ( ( greater(X5,X4)
        & size(X1,X7,X5)
        & size(X1,X6,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & organization(X1,X4) )
     => ~ greater(X6,X7) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t11_FOL]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X41,X42] :
      ( time(X42)
      | ~ organization(X41,X42) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp15])])]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(esk2_0,esk3_0)
    & greater(esk5_0,esk4_0)
    & size(esk1_0,esk5_0,esk7_0)
    & size(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk6_0)
    & complexity(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk7_0)
    & complexity(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk6_0)
    & reorganization_free(esk1_0,esk6_0,esk7_0)
    & organization(esk1_0,esk7_0)
    & organization(esk1_0,esk6_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ! [X23,X24,X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ~ greater(X24,X25)
      | ~ greater(X27,X26)
      | ~ size(X23,X25,X27)
      | ~ size(X23,X24,X26)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X23,X26,X27)
      | ~ organization(X23,X27)
      | ~ organization(X23,X26) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X38,X39,X40] :
      ( reorganization_free(X38,X40,X39)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X38,X39,X40) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp17])])]) ).

fof(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X21,X22] :
      ( greater(X22,X21)
      | X21 = X22
      | greater(X21,X22)
      | ~ time(X22)
      | ~ time(X21) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp16])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | time(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk1_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    size(esk1_0,esk4_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    organization(esk1_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | reorganization_free(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    reorganization_free(esk1_0,esk6_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X8,X9,X4,X5] :
      ( ( greater(X5,X4)
        & complexity(X1,X9,X5)
        & complexity(X1,X8,X4)
        & reorganization_free(X1,X4,X5)
        & organization(X1,X5)
        & organization(X1,X4) )
     => ~ greater(X8,X9) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t12_FOL]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ time(X2)
    | ~ time(X1)
    | greater(X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    time(esk7_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(esk6_0,X2)
    | ~ greater(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ organization(esk1_0,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(esk1_0,X2,esk6_0)
    | ~ size(esk1_0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    reorganization_free(esk1_0,esk7_0,esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    ! [X28,X29,X30,X31,X32] :
      ( ~ greater(X29,X30)
      | ~ greater(X32,X31)
      | ~ complexity(X28,X30,X32)
      | ~ complexity(X28,X29,X31)
      | ~ reorganization_free(X28,X31,X32)
      | ~ organization(X28,X32)
      | ~ organization(X28,X31) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ time(X1)
    | greater(X1,esk7_0)
    | greater(esk7_0,X1)
    | X1 = esk7_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    time(esk6_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(X1,esk4_0)
    | ~ greater(esk6_0,esk7_0)
    | ~ size(esk1_0,X1,esk7_0) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    size(esk1_0,esk5_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    greater(esk5_0,esk4_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(esk1_0,esk3_0,esk7_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_36,plain,
    ! [X33,X34,X35,X36,X37] :
      ( X34 = X35
      | X36 != X37
      | ~ size(X33,X35,X37)
      | ~ size(X33,X34,X36)
      | ~ organization(X33,X37)
      | ~ organization(X33,X36) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp19])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(esk7_0,esk6_0)
    | greater(esk6_0,esk7_0)
    | esk7_0 = esk6_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(esk6_0,esk7_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(esk7_0,X2)
    | ~ greater(X1,esk3_0)
    | ~ organization(esk1_0,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(esk1_0,X2,esk7_0)
    | ~ complexity(esk1_0,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(esk1_0,esk2_0,esk6_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    greater(esk2_0,esk3_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( X2 != X3
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | X4 = X5 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(esk7_0,esk6_0)
    | esk7_0 = esk6_0 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(esk7_0,esk6_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]),c_0_22]),c_0_20]),c_0_41])]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X3,X4)
    | ~ size(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ size(X3,X2,X4)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    esk7_0 = esk6_0,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

fof(c_0_47,plain,
    ! [X17,X18] :
      ( X17 != X18
      | ~ greater(X17,X18) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp6_1])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ size(esk1_0,X1,esk6_0)
    | X1 = esk4_0 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    size(esk1_0,esk5_0,esk6_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    esk4_0 = esk5_0,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    ~ greater(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_51]),c_0_52]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT014+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:23:01 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.45  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % sh5l with pid 3091471 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.45  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % SubtermCWHack with pid 3091479 completed with status 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.11/0.45  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.11/0.45  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.11/0.45  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.11/0.45  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.11/0.45  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % Proof found!
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.11/0.45  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 9
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.11/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 0.11/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 48
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.11/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 43
% 0.11/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 0.11/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 36
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46
% 0.11/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 32
% 0.11/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 46
% 0.11/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 36
% 0.11/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.11/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.11/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.11/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.11/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 40
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.11/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 129
% 0.11/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 0.11/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.11/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 26
% 0.11/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.11/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 2076
% 0.11/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 350
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.009 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.11/0.45  
% 0.11/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.11/0.45  % User time                : 0.007 s
% 0.11/0.45  % System time              : 0.009 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.11/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.11/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------