↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT014-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:01 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   57 (  28 unt;   6 nHn;  57 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  149 (  19 equ;  96 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   7 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   84 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(mp15_20,axiom,
    ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | time(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp15_20) ).

cnf(t11_FOL_24,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t11_FOL_24) ).

cnf(mp17_22,axiom,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | reorganization_free(X1,X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp17_22) ).

cnf(mp16_21,axiom,
    ( ~ time(X2)
    | ~ time(X1)
    | greater(X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp16_21) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_27,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1,sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_27) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_31,negated_conjecture,
    size(sk1,sk4,sk6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_31) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_26,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1,sk6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_26) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_28,negated_conjecture,
    reorganization_free(sk1,sk6,sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_28) ).

cnf(t12_FOL_25,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t12_FOL_25) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_32,negated_conjecture,
    size(sk1,sk5,sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_32) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_33,negated_conjecture,
    greater(sk5,sk4),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_33) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_30,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(sk1,sk3,sk7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_30) ).

cnf(mp19_23,axiom,
    ( X2 != X3
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | X4 = X5 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp19_23) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_29,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(sk1,sk2,sk6),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_29) ).

cnf(t14_FOL_34,negated_conjecture,
    greater(sk2,sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',t14_FOL_34) ).

cnf(mp6_1_18,axiom,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp6_1_18) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | time(X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp15_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t11_FOL_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | reorganization_free(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp17_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ time(X2)
    | ~ time(X1)
    | greater(X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp16_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | time(X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1,sk7),
    t14_FOL_27 ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    size(sk1,sk4,sk6),
    t14_FOL_31 ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    organization(sk1,sk6),
    t14_FOL_26 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | reorganization_free(X1,X3,X2) ),
    c_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    reorganization_free(sk1,sk6,sk7),
    t14_FOL_28 ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ time(X2)
    | ~ time(X1)
    | greater(X2,X1)
    | X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    time(sk7),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(sk6,X2)
    | ~ greater(X1,sk4)
    | ~ organization(sk1,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(sk1,X2,sk6)
    | ~ size(sk1,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    reorganization_free(sk1,sk7,sk6),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[t12_FOL_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ time(X1)
    | greater(X1,sk7)
    | greater(sk7,X1)
    | X1 = sk7 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    time(sk6),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(X1,sk4)
    | ~ greater(sk6,sk7)
    | ~ size(sk1,X1,sk7) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    size(sk1,sk5,sk7),
    t14_FOL_32 ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    greater(sk5,sk4),
    t14_FOL_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ( ~ greater(X4,X5)
    | ~ greater(X3,X2)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ complexity(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(sk1,sk3,sk7),
    t14_FOL_30 ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( X2 != X3
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | X4 = X5 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp19_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(sk7,sk6)
    | greater(sk6,sk7)
    | sk7 = sk6 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(sk6,sk7),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ greater(sk7,X2)
    | ~ greater(X1,sk3)
    | ~ organization(sk1,X2)
    | ~ reorganization_free(sk1,X2,sk7)
    | ~ complexity(sk1,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]),c_0_21])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    complexity(sk1,sk2,sk6),
    t14_FOL_29 ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    greater(sk2,sk3),
    t14_FOL_34 ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( X2 != X3
    | ~ size(X1,X5,X3)
    | ~ size(X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ organization(X1,X3)
    | ~ organization(X1,X2)
    | X4 = X5 ),
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_46,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(sk7,sk6)
    | sk7 = sk6 ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(sk7,sk6),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]),c_0_26]),c_0_24]),c_0_44])]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    ( ~ organization(X3,X4)
    | ~ size(X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ size(X3,X2,X4)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_45]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,negated_conjecture,
    sk7 = sk6,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp6_1_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ size(sk1,X1,sk6)
    | X1 = sk4 ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_23]),c_0_24])]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    size(sk1,sk5,sk6),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_49]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    ( X1 != X2
    | ~ greater(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_50 ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    sk4 = sk5,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ~ greater(X1,X1),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_54]),c_0_55]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT014-1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:24:36 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.42  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % sh5l with pid 251713 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.42  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.42  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % SubtermCWHack with pid 251720 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.42  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.42  % Search class: FGHSF-FFSM00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.42  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.42  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.42  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.42  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.42  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.42  % Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.14/0.42  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.14/0.42  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 0.14/0.42  % Processed clauses                    : 48
% 0.14/0.42  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % ...subsumed                          : 5
% 0.14/0.42  % ...remaining for further processing  : 43
% 0.14/0.42  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % Backward-rewritten                   : 17
% 0.14/0.42  % Generated clauses                    : 36
% 0.14/0.42  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 46
% 0.14/0.42  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Paramodulations                      : 32
% 0.14/0.42  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Total rewrite steps                  : 46
% 0.14/0.42  % ...of those cached                   : 36
% 0.14/0.42  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of processed clauses  : 20
% 0.14/0.42  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 9
% 0.14/0.42  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.42  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.14/0.42  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 12
% 0.14/0.42  % ...number of literals in the above   : 40
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Current number of archived clauses   : 21
% 0.14/0.42  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 109
% 0.14/0.42  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 40
% 0.14/0.42  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.14/0.42  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 25
% 0.14/0.42  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.14/0.42  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.42  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 1155
% 0.14/0.42  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 47
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.42  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.14/0.42  
% 0.14/0.42  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.42  % User time                : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.42  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Total time               : 0.011 s
% 0.14/0.42  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.42  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------