↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT014-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.39s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT014-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:54:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.10/0.39  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.10/0.39  #
% 0.10/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.39  # Number of axioms: 17 Number of unprocessed: 17
% 0.10/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.10/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.10/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.10/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.10/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.10/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.10/0.39  # 17 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.10/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 9 conjectures.
% 0.10/0.39  # There are 9 start rule candidates:
% 0.10/0.39  # Found 10 unit axioms.
% 0.10/0.39  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.10/0.39  # 9 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.10/0.39  # 7 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.10/0.39  # 10 unit axiom clauses
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.10/0.39  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.10/0.39  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.39  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.39  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  # End clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.39  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_34, negated_conjecture, (greater(sk2,sk3))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_33, negated_conjecture, (greater(sk5,sk4))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_26, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk1,sk6))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_27, negated_conjecture, (organization(sk1,sk7))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (reorganization_free(sk1,sk6,sk7))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_31, negated_conjecture, (size(sk1,sk4,sk6))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_32, negated_conjecture, (size(sk1,sk5,sk7))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_29, negated_conjecture, (complexity(sk1,sk2,sk6))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_30, negated_conjecture, (complexity(sk1,sk3,sk7))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~greater(X1,X1))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~greater(X1,X2)|~greater(X2,X1))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_20, plain, (time(X1)|~organization(X2,X1))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (reorganization_free(X1,X2,X3)|~reorganization_free(X1,X3,X2))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_21, plain, (X1=X2|greater(X1,X2)|greater(X2,X1)|~time(X2)|~time(X1))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (X1=X2|~size(X3,X2,X4)|~size(X3,X1,X4)|~organization(X3,X4))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_24, hypothesis, (~size(X1,X2,X3)|~size(X1,X4,X5)|~reorganization_free(X1,X5,X3)|~organization(X1,X3)|~organization(X1,X5)|~greater(X4,X2)|~greater(X3,X5))).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_25, hypothesis, (~complexity(X1,X2,X3)|~complexity(X1,X4,X5)|~reorganization_free(X1,X5,X3)|~organization(X1,X3)|~organization(X1,X5)|~greater(X4,X2)|~greater(X3,X5))).
% 0.10/0.39  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.10/0.39  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.10/0.39  # Found 9 steps
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_28, negated_conjecture, (reorganization_free(sk1,sk6,sk7)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_41, plain, (reorganization_free(sk1,sk6,sk7)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_22])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (reorganization_free(sk1,sk7,sk6)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_24])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_65, plain, (~size(sk1,sk4,sk6)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_31])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_66, plain, (~size(sk1,sk5,sk7)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_32])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_68, plain, (~organization(sk1,sk6)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_26])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_69, plain, (~organization(sk1,sk7)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_27])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_70, plain, (~greater(sk5,sk4)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_33])).
% 0.10/0.39  cnf(i_0_71, plain, (~greater(sk6,sk7)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_71, ...])).
% 0.10/0.39  # End printing tableau
% 0.10/0.39  # SZS output end
% 0.10/0.39  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.10/0.39  # Child (1682676) has found a proof.
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.40  # Proof search is over...
% 0.10/0.40  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------