↑ Up

Enigma---0.5.1.CSA-Sat.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : MGT019+2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:07:32 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 15.94s 4.08s
% Output   : Saturation 15.94s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_4,plain,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))
    | ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_5,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_8) ).

cnf(i_0_6,hypothesis,
    ( greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1))
    | ~ environment(X2)
    | ~ stable(X2)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,esk3_1(X2))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_6) ).

cnf(i_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater_or_equal(esk5_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_9) ).

cnf(i_0_1,plain,
    ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_7,hypothesis,
    ( in_environment(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_7) ).

cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk4_0,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_2,plain,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_3,plain,
    environment(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    stable(esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    environment(esk4_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-nnyrrdbj/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))
    | ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1)) ),
    i_0_4,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | greater(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2) ),
    i_0_5,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1)
    | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1))) ),
    i_0_8,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1)
    | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
    ( greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1))
    | ~ environment(X2)
    | ~ stable(X2)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(X1,esk3_1(X2))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1) ),
    i_0_6,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater_or_equal(esk5_1(X1),X1)
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1) ),
    i_0_9,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)),founding_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1)))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)))
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1))),founding_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1))))
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1)))
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0)),
    i_0_1,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1))) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1)))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1))),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1))))
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk5_1(esk3_1(X1)))
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)) = growth_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk5_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk5_1(X1)))
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_26]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0) = disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk2_0)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(disbanding_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_26]),
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ( in_environment(X1,esk3_1(X1))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1) ),
    i_0_7,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk4_0,esk5_1(X1))
    | ~ in_environment(esk4_0,X1) ),
    i_0_10,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    i_0_2,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    environment(esk1_0),
    i_0_3,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    stable(esk4_0),
    i_0_11,
    [final] ).

cnf(c_0_42,negated_conjecture,
    environment(esk4_0),
    i_0_12,
    [final] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT019+2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.11/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 11:56:44 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.24/0.47  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 15.94/4.08  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 15.94/4.08  # No SInE strategy applied
% 15.94/4.08  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 15.94/4.08  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y_ni
% 15.94/4.08  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 15.94/4.08  #
% 15.94/4.08  # Preprocessing time       : 0.024 s
% 15.94/4.08  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 15.94/4.08  
% 15.94/4.08  # No proof found!
% 15.94/4.08  # SZS status Satisfiable
% 15.94/4.08  # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 15.94/4.08  
% 15.94/4.08  # -------------------------------------------------
% 15.94/4.08  # User time                : 0.025 s
% 15.94/4.08  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 15.94/4.08  # Total time               : 0.029 s
% 15.94/4.08  # Maximum resident set size: 3328 pages
% 15.94/4.08  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------