%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : MGT019-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:03 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Satisfiable 0.16s 5.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named c_0_14ERROR: Could not build tree for root c_0_22ERROR: MakeTreeStats fails)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
( ~ greater_or_equal(X2,sk3(X1))
| ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)
| ~ stable(X1)
| ~ environment(X1)
| greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X2),founding_rate(first_movers,X2)) ),
c_0_12,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in_environment(sk4,X1)
| subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(X1)) ),
c_0_13,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
stable(sk4),
prove_l1_30,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
environment(sk4),
prove_l1_29,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ greater_or_equal(X1,X2)
| X1 = X2
| greater(X1,X2) ),
c_0_14,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ greater_or_equal(sk5(X1),sk3(sk4))
| ~ in_environment(sk4,X1)
| greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(X1)),founding_rate(first_movers,sk5(X1))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
( ~ greater_or_equal(sk5(X1),sk3(sk4))
| ~ in_environment(sk4,X1)
| greater(founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(X1)),founding_rate(first_movers,sk5(X1)))
| founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(X1)) = founding_rate(first_movers,sk5(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in_environment(sk4,X1)
| greater_or_equal(sk5(X1),X1) ),
c_0_21,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
l2_23,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
environment(sk1),
l2_22,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
( ~ stable(X1)
| ~ environment(X1)
| in_environment(X1,sk3(X1)) ),
c_0_24,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_29,hypothesis,
( ~ greater_or_equal(sk2,sk3(sk1))
| ~ stable(sk1)
| greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),founding_rate(first_movers,sk2)) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
( ~ in_environment(sk4,X1)
| greater(sk5(X1),X1)
| sk5(X1) = X1 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_23]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
( greater(founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(sk3(sk4))),founding_rate(first_movers,sk5(sk3(sk4))))
| founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(sk3(sk4))) = founding_rate(first_movers,sk5(sk3(sk4))) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
( ~ greater_or_equal(sk2,sk3(sk1))
| ~ stable(sk1)
| greater(founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),founding_rate(first_movers,sk2))
| founding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2) = founding_rate(first_movers,sk2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_29]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_36,hypothesis,
( greater(sk5(sk3(sk4)),sk3(sk4))
| sk5(sk3(sk4)) = sk3(sk4) ),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_28]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( ~ greater_or_equal(founding_rate(efficient_producers,X1),founding_rate(first_movers,X1))
| ~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,X1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,X1))
| greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1)) ),
c_0_31,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
( ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk5(X1)))
| ~ in_environment(sk4,X1) ),
c_0_32,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_39,plain,
~ greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)),
c_0_33,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT019-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.39 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.39 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.39 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.39 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.39 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.39 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.39 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:24:26 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.39 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.39 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.16/5.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/5.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/5.46 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/5.46 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 251040 completed with status 1
% 0.16/5.46 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/5.46 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.46 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 251045 completed with status 1
% 0.16/5.46 % Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.16/5.46 % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/5.46 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/5.46 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/5.46 % Search class: FGHSF-FFSS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.16/5.46 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/5.46 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/5.46 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/5.46
% 0.16/5.46 % No proof found!
% 0.16/5.46 % SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.16/5.46 % SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.16/5.46 % Parsed axioms : 12
% 0.16/5.46 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Initial clauses : 12
% 0.16/5.46 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 0.16/5.46 % Processed clauses : 32
% 0.16/5.46 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % ...subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % ...remaining for further processing : 32
% 0.16/5.46 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.16/5.46 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Generated clauses : 8
% 0.16/5.46 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.16/5.46 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Paramodulations : 8
% 0.16/5.46 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % NegExts : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Total rewrite steps : 7
% 0.16/5.46 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/5.46 % Current number of processed clauses : 19
% 0.16/5.46 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.16/5.46 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.16/5.46 % Non-unit-clauses : 14
% 0.16/5.46 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.16/5.46 % ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Current number of archived clauses : 13
% 0.16/5.46 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 69
% 0.16/5.46 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 0.16/5.46 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.16/5.46 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.16/5.46 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.16/5.46 % BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/5.46 % Termbank termtop insertions : 763
% 0.16/5.46 % Search garbage collected termcells : 32
% 0.16/5.46
% 0.16/5.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.46 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/5.46 % System time : 0.003 s
% 0.16/5.46 % Total time : 0.006 s
% 0.16/5.46 % Maximum resident set size: 3640 pages
% 0.16/5.46
% 0.16/5.46 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/5.46 % User time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/5.46 % System time : 0.012 s
% 0.16/5.46 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.16/5.46 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.16/5.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------