↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT020+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.55s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT020+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:02:11 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.55  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.55  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.55  SPASS derived 225 clauses, backtracked 9 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 117 clauses.
% 0.22/0.55  SPASS allocated 97837 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.55  SPASS spent	0:00:00.18 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.55  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.22/0.55  		0:00:00.05 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.55  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.55  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.55  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  
% 0.22/0.55  Here is a proof with depth 5, length 47 :
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.55  1[0:Inp] ||  -> environment(skc3)*.
% 0.22/0.55  2[0:Inp] ||  -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.22/0.55  3[0:Inp] || greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,skc2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,skc2))*r -> .
% 0.22/0.55  4[0:Inp] environment(u) ||  -> greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP(u),start_time(u))*.
% 0.22/0.55  5[0:Inp] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* -> equal(u,v) greater(u,v).
% 0.22/0.55  7[0:Inp] environment(u) || subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)* -> in_environment(u,v).
% 0.22/0.55  8[0:Inp] environment(u) ||  -> greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP(u)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP(u)))*r.
% 0.22/0.55  9[0:Inp] environment(u) || subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)* -> greater_or_equal(v,initial_FM_EP(u)).
% 0.22/0.55  10[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,initial_FM_EP(u)) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,initial_FM_EP(u))*.
% 0.22/0.55  11[0:Inp] environment(u) || decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,v),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,v)))*+ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)* -> .
% 0.22/0.55  12[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater(v,w)*+ in_environment(u,v)* greater_or_equal(w,start_time(u))* -> in_environment(u,w).
% 0.22/0.55  13[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater_or_equal(v,w)* greater_or_equal(w,x)* subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)*+ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,x)* -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,w)*.
% 0.22/0.55  14[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater_or_equal(v,w)* greater_or_equal(w,x)* greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,x),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,x))*r+ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)* -> decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,w),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,w)))* greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,v),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,v)).
% 0.22/0.55  18[0:Res:1.0,11.0] || decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,u),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,u)))* subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u) -> .
% 0.22/0.55  19[0:Res:1.0,8.0] ||  -> greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,initial_FM_EP(skc3)),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,initial_FM_EP(skc3)))*r.
% 0.22/0.55  20[0:Res:1.0,10.0] || in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3)) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  21[0:Res:1.0,9.0] || subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u)* -> greater_or_equal(u,initial_FM_EP(skc3)).
% 0.22/0.55  26[0:Res:2.0,9.1] environment(skc3) ||  -> greater_or_equal(skc2,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  27[0:Res:2.0,7.1] environment(skc3) ||  -> in_environment(skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.22/0.55  28[0:Res:2.0,13.2] environment(skc3) || subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u)* greater_or_equal(v,u)* greater_or_equal(skc2,v) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,v)*.
% 0.22/0.55  29[0:Res:2.0,14.4] environment(skc3) || greater_or_equal(u,v)* greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,v),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,v))*r greater_or_equal(skc2,u) -> decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,u),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,u)))* greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,skc2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,skc2)).
% 0.22/0.55  30[0:MRR:27.0,1.0] ||  -> in_environment(skc3,skc2)*.
% 0.22/0.55  31[0:MRR:26.0,1.0] ||  -> greater_or_equal(skc2,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  33[0:MRR:28.0,1.0] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* greater_or_equal(skc2,u) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,v)*+ -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u)*.
% 0.22/0.55  35[0:MRR:29.0,29.5,1.0,3.0] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* greater_or_equal(skc2,u) greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,v),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,v))*r+ -> decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,u),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,u)))*.
% 0.22/0.55  46[0:Res:10.2,9.1] environment(u) environment(u) || in_environment(u,initial_FM_EP(u)) -> greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP(u),initial_FM_EP(u))*.
% 0.22/0.55  48[0:Obv:46.0] environment(u) || in_environment(u,initial_FM_EP(u)) -> greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP(u),initial_FM_EP(u))*.
% 0.22/0.55  49[0:Res:31.0,5.0] ||  -> equal(initial_FM_EP(skc3),skc2) greater(skc2,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*r.
% 0.22/0.55  54[1:Spt:49.0] ||  -> equal(initial_FM_EP(skc3),skc2)**.
% 0.22/0.55  60[1:Rew:54.0,19.0] ||  -> greater(disbanding_rate(first_movers,skc2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,skc2))*r.
% 0.22/0.55  64[1:MRR:60.0,3.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.55  66[1:Spt:64.0,49.0,54.0] || equal(initial_FM_EP(skc3),skc2)** -> .
% 0.22/0.55  67[1:Spt:64.0,49.1] ||  -> greater(skc2,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*r.
% 0.22/0.55  79[1:Res:67.0,12.1] environment(u) || in_environment(u,skc2) greater_or_equal(initial_FM_EP(skc3),start_time(u))* -> in_environment(u,initial_FM_EP(skc3)).
% 0.22/0.55  93[1:Res:4.1,79.2] environment(skc3) environment(skc3) || in_environment(skc3,skc2) -> in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  94[1:Obv:93.0] environment(skc3) || in_environment(skc3,skc2) -> in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  95[1:SSi:94.0,1.0] || in_environment(skc3,skc2) -> in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  96[1:MRR:95.0,30.0] ||  -> in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  97[1:MRR:20.0,96.0] ||  -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3))*.
% 0.22/0.55  112[1:Res:97.0,33.2] || greater_or_equal(u,initial_FM_EP(skc3)) greater_or_equal(skc2,u) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u)*.
% 0.22/0.55  265[0:Res:19.0,35.2] || greater_or_equal(u,initial_FM_EP(skc3)) greater_or_equal(skc2,u) -> decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,u),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,u)))*.
% 0.22/0.55  273[0:Res:265.2,18.0] || greater_or_equal(u,initial_FM_EP(skc3)) greater_or_equal(skc2,u) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u)* -> .
% 0.22/0.55  276[0:MRR:273.0,21.1] || greater_or_equal(skc2,u) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc3,u)* -> .
% 0.22/0.55  279[1:MRR:112.2,276.1] || greater_or_equal(u,initial_FM_EP(skc3))* greater_or_equal(skc2,u) -> .
% 0.22/0.55  284[1:Res:48.2,279.0] environment(skc3) || in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3)) greater_or_equal(skc2,initial_FM_EP(skc3))* -> .
% 0.22/0.55  288[1:SSi:284.0,1.0] || in_environment(skc3,initial_FM_EP(skc3)) greater_or_equal(skc2,initial_FM_EP(skc3))* -> .
% 0.22/0.55  289[1:MRR:288.0,288.1,96.0,31.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.55  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.55  Formulae used in the proof : prove_l2 mp_initial_time mp_greater_or_equal mp_time_point_occurs a8 mp_earliest_time_point l3 mp_times_in_order a10 mp_positive_function_difference
% 0.22/0.55  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------