↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : MGT021+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:02:08 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  104 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  116 (  51   ~;  41   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  11  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    8 (   7 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  13   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mp_time_point_in_environment,axiom,
    ! [E,T] :
      ( ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => in_environment(E,T) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp_time_point_in_environment) ).

fof(mp_environment_not_empty,axiom,
    ! [E,T] :
      ( ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => greater(number_of_organizations(E,T),zero) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp_environment_not_empty) ).

fof(mp_increase_not_decrease,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( increases(X)
     => ~ decreases(X) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp_increase_not_decrease) ).

fof(a3,axiom,
    ! [E,T] :
      ( ( greater(number_of_organizations(E,T),zero)
        & in_environment(E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => ( ( ~ greater(equilibrium(E),T)
         => constant(resources(E,T)) )
        & ( greater(equilibrium(E),T)
         => decreases(resources(E,T)) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a3) ).

fof(l4,axiom,
    ! [E,T] :
      ( ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => ( ( constant(resources(E,T))
         => ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,T),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,T))) )
        & ( decreases(resources(E,T))
         => increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,T),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,T))) ) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',l4) ).

fof(prove_l3,conjecture,
    ! [E,T] :
      ( ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,T),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,T))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_l3) ).

fof(prove_l3_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [E,T] :
        ( ( subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
          & environment(E) )
       => ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,T),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,T))) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_l3]) ).

fof(nnf_7,plain,
    ? [E,T] :
      ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,T),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,T)))
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
      & environment(E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[prove_l3_neg]) ).

fof(sk_prove_l3_neg,plain,
    ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)))
    & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1)
    & environment(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(E,sK0),skolemize(T,sK1)],[nnf_7]) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    environment(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_l3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,B),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,B)))
    | ~ constant(resources(A,B))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l4]) ).

cnf(c_10,plain,
    ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,B),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,B)))
    | ~ decreases(resources(A,B))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[l4]) ).

cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( constant(resources(A,B))
    | greater(equilibrium(A),B)
    | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(A,B),zero)
    | ~ in_environment(A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a3]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( decreases(resources(A,B))
    | ~ greater(equilibrium(A),B)
    | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(A,B),zero)
    | ~ in_environment(A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[a3]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    ( greater(number_of_organizations(A,B),zero)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mp_environment_not_empty]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    ( in_environment(A,B)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mp_time_point_in_environment]) ).

cnf(c_15,plain,
    ( ~ decreases(A)
    | ~ increases(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mp_increase_not_decrease]) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,A),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,A)))
    | ~ decreases(resources(sK0,A))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_10]) ).

cnf(c_17,negated_conjecture,
    ( in_environment(sK0,A)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_14]) ).

cnf(c_18,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(number_of_organizations(sK0,A),zero)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_13]) ).

cnf(c_19,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sK0,A))
    | ~ greater(equilibrium(sK0),A)
    | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(sK0,A),zero)
    | ~ in_environment(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( constant(resources(sK0,A))
    | greater(equilibrium(sK0),A)
    | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(sK0,A),zero)
    | ~ in_environment(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_11]) ).

cnf(c_21,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,A),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,A)))
    | ~ constant(resources(sK0,A))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_8,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_l3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_23,negated_conjecture,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_prove_l3_neg]) ).

cnf(c_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ decreases(resources(sK0,A))
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,A)
    | ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,A),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,A))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_15,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)))
    | ~ constant(resources(sK0,sK1)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_21]) ).

cnf(c_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ constant(resources(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_26,plain,
    greater(number_of_organizations(sK0,sK1),zero),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_18]) ).

cnf(c_27,plain,
    in_environment(sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_17]) ).

cnf(c_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ decreases(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sK1),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_23]) ).

cnf(c_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ decreases(resources(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_32]) ).

cnf(c_33,negated_conjecture,
    ( constant(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | greater(equilibrium(sK0),sK1)
    | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(sK0,sK1),zero) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( constant(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | greater(equilibrium(sK0),sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_29,negated_conjecture,
    greater(equilibrium(sK0),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_25,c_34]) ).

cnf(c_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ greater(equilibrium(sK0),sK1)
    | ~ greater(number_of_organizations(sK0,sK1),zero) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_27,c_19]) ).

cnf(c_36,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sK0,sK1))
    | ~ greater(equilibrium(sK0),sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_37,negated_conjecture,
    decreases(resources(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_29,c_36]) ).

cnf(c_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_28,c_37]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT021+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:05:05 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.37  % Process 4148864 was started by sandbox2 on n020,
% 0.10/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 00:05:05 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.38  
% 0.10/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.10/0.39  % Length of proof is 29.
% 0.10/0.39  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.10/0.39  % Maximum clause weight is 17.000.
% 0.10/0.39  % Given clauses 11.
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------