↑ Up

Leo-III---1.8.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem  : MGT022+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:00:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.43s 2.55s
% Output   : Refutation 3.43s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   39 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  181 (   7   ~;   0   |;  12   &; 145   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;  17  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   8 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   13 (  12 usr;   3 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   0   ^;  16   !;   0   ?;  16   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(environment_decl,type,
    environment: $i > $o ).

thf(subpopulations_decl,type,
    subpopulations: $i > $i > $i > $i > $o ).

thf(first_movers_decl,type,
    first_movers: $i ).

thf(efficient_producers_decl,type,
    efficient_producers: $i ).

thf(decreases_decl,type,
    decreases: $i > $o ).

thf(resources_decl,type,
    resources: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(increases_decl,type,
    increases: $i > $o ).

thf(difference_decl,type,
    difference: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(disbanding_rate_decl,type,
    disbanding_rate: $i > $i > $i ).

thf(constant_decl,type,
    constant: $i > $o ).

thf(greater_decl,type,
    greater: $i > $i > $o ).

thf(resilience_decl,type,
    resilience: $i > $i ).

thf(1,conjecture,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ ( A @ ( efficient_producers @ ( first_movers @ subpopulations ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ environment ) )
     => ( ( ( B @ ( A @ resources ) @ constant )
         => ~ ( B @ ( efficient_producers @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( B @ ( first_movers @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ decreases ) )
        & ( ( B @ ( A @ resources ) @ decreases )
         => ( B @ ( efficient_producers @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( B @ ( first_movers @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ increases ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4) ).

thf(2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ ( efficient_producers @ ( first_movers @ subpopulations ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ environment ) )
       => ( ( ( B @ ( A @ resources ) @ constant )
           => ~ ( B @ ( efficient_producers @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( B @ ( first_movers @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ decreases ) )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ resources ) @ decreases )
           => ( B @ ( efficient_producers @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( B @ ( first_movers @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ increases ) ) ) ),
    inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).

thf(6,plain,
    ~ ! [A: $i,B: $i] :
        ( ( ( B @ ( A @ ( efficient_producers @ ( first_movers @ subpopulations ) ) ) )
          & ( A @ environment ) )
       => ( ( ( B @ ( A @ resources ) @ constant )
           => ~ ( B @ ( efficient_producers @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( B @ ( first_movers @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ decreases ) )
          & ( ( B @ ( A @ resources ) @ decreases )
           => ( B @ ( efficient_producers @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( B @ ( first_movers @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ increases ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).

thf(3,axiom,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ constant )
     => ~ ( A @ decreases ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_constant_not_decrease) ).

thf(14,plain,
    ! [A: $i] :
      ( ( A @ constant )
     => ~ ( A @ decreases ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[3]) ).

thf(4,axiom,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ resilience @ ( C @ resilience @ greater ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ subpopulations ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ environment ) )
     => ( ( ( D @ ( A @ resources ) @ constant )
         => ( D @ ( C @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( D @ ( B @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ constant ) )
        & ( ( D @ ( A @ resources ) @ decreases )
         => ( D @ ( C @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( D @ ( B @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ increases ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a6) ).

thf(16,plain,
    ! [A: $i,B: $i,C: $i,D: $i] :
      ( ( ( B @ resilience @ ( C @ resilience @ greater ) )
        & ( D @ ( A @ ( C @ ( B @ subpopulations ) ) ) )
        & ( A @ environment ) )
     => ( ( ( D @ ( A @ resources ) @ constant )
         => ( D @ ( C @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( D @ ( B @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ constant ) )
        & ( ( D @ ( A @ resources ) @ decreases )
         => ( D @ ( C @ disbanding_rate ) @ ( D @ ( B @ disbanding_rate ) @ difference ) @ increases ) ) ) ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[4]) ).

thf(5,axiom,
    first_movers @ resilience @ ( efficient_producers @ resilience @ greater ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2) ).

thf(20,plain,
    first_movers @ resilience @ ( efficient_producers @ resilience @ greater ),
    inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[5]) ).

thf(21,plain,
    $false,
    inference(e,[status(thm)],[6,14,16,20]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT022+2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08  % Command  : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.15/0.62  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.62  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.62  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.62  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.62  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.62  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.62  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.62  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:03:39 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.62  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.62  Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p  --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 1.02/1.22  % [INFO] 	 Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ... 
% 1.35/1.41  % [INFO] 	 Parsing done (186ms). 
% 1.35/1.42  % [INFO] 	 Running in sequential loop mode. 
% 1.94/1.82  % [INFO] 	 eprover registered as external prover. 
% 1.94/1.83  % [INFO] 	 Scanning for conjecture ... 
% 2.10/1.94  % [INFO] 	 Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 3 axioms. Running axiom selection ... 
% 2.10/1.98  % [INFO] 	 Axiom selection finished. Selected 3 axioms (removed 0 axioms). 
% 2.10/2.00  % [INFO] 	 Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF). 
% 2.10/2.00  % [INFO] 	 Type checking passed. 
% 2.10/2.01  % [CONFIG] 	 Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>.  Searching for refutation ... 
% 3.43/2.55  % External prover 'e' found a proof!
% 3.43/2.55  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
% 3.43/2.55  % Time passed: 1779ms (effective reasoning time: 1122ms)
% 3.43/2.55  % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 3.43/2.55  % Axioms used in derivation (3): mp_constant_not_decrease, a6, a2
% 3.43/2.55  % No. of inferences in proof: 10
% 3.43/2.55  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 1779 ms resp. 1122 ms w/o parsing
% 3.43/2.59  % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.43/2.59  % [INFO] 	 Killing All external provers ... 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------