↑ Up

SPASS-SCL---0.1.1.UNS-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS-SCL---0.1.1
% Problem  : MGT022-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:20:07 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.02s 0.30s
% Output   : Proof 0.02s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   4 unt;   2 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   31 (   0 equ;  20 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   11 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% FILE RECORD
cnf(mp_constant_not_decrease_1,axiom,
    ( ~ constant(X0)
    | ~ decreases(X0) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp_constant_not_decrease_1) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(a6_3,hypothesis,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | ~ subpopulations(X1,X2,X0,X3)
    | ~ greater(resilience(X2),resilience(X1))
    | ~ constant(resources(X0,X3))
    | constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X3),disbanding_rate(X2,X3))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a6_3) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(prove_l4_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_8) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(prove_l4_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | constant(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_7) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(a2_4,hypothesis,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a2_4) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(prove_l4_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | constant(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_9) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(a6_2,hypothesis,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | ~ subpopulations(X1,X2,X0,X3)
    | ~ greater(resilience(X2),resilience(X1))
    | ~ decreases(resources(X0,X3))
    | increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X3),disbanding_rate(X2,X3))) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a6_2) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_11,plain,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X0,sk2)
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
    | ~ decreases(resources(X0,sk2))
    | ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[prove_l4_9,a6_2,mp_constant_not_decrease_1]) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( ~ environment(X0)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X0,sk2)
    | ~ decreases(resources(X0,sk2))
    | ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[a2_4,c_11]) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(prove_l4_6,negated_conjecture,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_6) ).

% FILE RECORD
cnf(prove_l4_5,negated_conjecture,
    environment(sk1),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_5) ).

% CNF SPASS RESOLUTION.
cnf(c_13,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[mp_constant_not_decrease_1,a6_3,prove_l4_8,prove_l4_7,c_12,prove_l4_6,a2_4,prove_l4_5]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : MGT022-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.30  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.02/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.02/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.02/0.30  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.02/0.30  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.02/0.30  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.02/0.30  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.02/0.30  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:06:11 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.30  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.30  Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/SPASS-SCL-FOL -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % Input Clauses:
% 0.02/0.30  % 1:2:1:INP:Top: constant(x0),decreases(x0) -> 
% 0.02/0.30  % 2:5:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: environment(x0),subpopulations(x1,x2,x0,x3),greater(resilience(x2),resilience(x1)),decreases(resources(x0,x3)) -> increases(difference(disbanding_rate(x1,x3),disbanding_rate(x2,x3)))
% 0.02/0.30  % 3:5:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: environment(x0),subpopulations(x1,x2,x0,x3),greater(resilience(x2),resilience(x1)),constant(resources(x0,x3)) -> constant(difference(disbanding_rate(x1,x3),disbanding_rate(x2,x3)))
% 0.02/0.30  % 4:1:0:INP::  -> greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
% 0.02/0.30  % 5:1:0:INP::  -> environment(sk1)
% 0.02/0.30  % 6:1:0:INP::  -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)
% 0.02/0.30  % 7:2:0:INP::  -> decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)),constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
% 0.02/0.30  % 8:2:0:INP::  -> decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)),decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
% 0.02/0.30  % 9:2:0:INP:: increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) -> constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
% 0.02/0.30  % 10:2:0:INP:: increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) -> decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % Predicates: constant decreases environment subpopulations greater increases 
% 0.02/0.30  % Fol Constants: efficient_producers first_movers sk1 sk2 
% 0.02/0.30  % Fol Functions: resilience resources disbanding_rate difference 
% 0.02/0.30  % Problem Properties:
% 0.02/0.30  % This is a full first-order problem without equality. The Problem is non-linear. 
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % Reduced Input Axiom Clauses:
% 0.02/0.30  % 1:2:1:INP:Top: constant(x0),decreases(x0) -> 
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % Reduced Input Conjecture Clauses:
% 0.02/0.30  % 2:5:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: environment(x0),subpopulations(x1,x2,x0,x3),greater(resilience(x2),resilience(x1)),decreases(resources(x0,x3)) -> increases(difference(disbanding_rate(x1,x3),disbanding_rate(x2,x3)))
% 0.02/0.30  % 3:5:4:INP:TopTopTopTop: environment(x0),subpopulations(x1,x2,x0,x3),greater(resilience(x2),resilience(x1)),constant(resources(x0,x3)) -> constant(difference(disbanding_rate(x1,x3),disbanding_rate(x2,x3)))
% 0.02/0.30  % 4:1:0:INP::  -> greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
% 0.02/0.30  % 5:1:0:INP::  -> environment(sk1)
% 0.02/0.30  % 6:1:0:INP::  -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)
% 0.02/0.30  % 7:2:0:INP::  -> decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)),constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
% 0.02/0.30  % 8:2:0:INP::  -> decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)),decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
% 0.02/0.30  % 9:2:0:INP:: increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) -> constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
% 0.02/0.30  % 10:2:0:INP:: increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) -> decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % === Starting SPASS-SCL-FOL A Little Less Naive, considering 23 atoms initially. Used heuristic: lmodel_grow ===
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.02/0.30  % Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % SPASS-SCL-FOL Statistics:
% 0.02/0.30  % Number of learned clauses: 1
% 0.02/0.30  % Number of propagations: 17
% 0.02/0.30  % Number of decisions: 15
% 0.02/0.30  % Number of resolutions: 9
% 0.02/0.30  % Number of condensations: 0
% 0.02/0.30  % Number of sub resolutions: 1
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % Solver is done. Empty clause found
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.02/0.30  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.02/0.30  %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % Needed:       0:00:00.00
% 0.02/0.30  
% 0.02/0.30  % ###
% 0.02/0.30  % ### Pagesize: 8192
% 0.02/0.30  % ### Marksize: 0
% 0.02/0.30  % ### Memory demanded:  430 KBytes
% 0.02/0.30  % ### Memory freed:     430 KBytes
% 0.02/0.30  % ### Memory remaining: 0 Bytes
% 0.02/0.30  % ### Pages allocated:  113 Pages
% 0.02/0.30  % ###
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------