↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : MGT022-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:12:23 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.17s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.17s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   30 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   68 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  37   ~;  38   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   24 (   0 sgn  24   !;   0   ?;  15   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ decreases(X0)
      | ~ constant(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_constant_not_decrease_1) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X3),disbanding_rate(X2,X3)))
      | ~ decreases(resources(X0,X3))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X2),resilience(X1))
      | ~ subpopulations(X1,X2,X0,X3)
      | ~ environment(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a6_2) ).

fof(f3,axiom,
    ! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
      ( constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X1,X3),disbanding_rate(X2,X3)))
      | ~ constant(resources(X0,X3))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X2),resilience(X1))
      | ~ subpopulations(X1,X2,X0,X3)
      | ~ environment(X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a6_3) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2_4) ).

fof(f5,negated_conjecture,
    environment(sk1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_5) ).

fof(f6,negated_conjecture,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_6) ).

fof(f7,negated_conjecture,
    ( constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_7) ).

fof(f8,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_8) ).

fof(f9,negated_conjecture,
    ( constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_9) ).

fof(f10,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l4_10) ).

tcf(c_59,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ decreases(X0)
      | ~ constant(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X0,X3),disbanding_rate(X1,X3)))
      | ~ environment(X2)
      | ~ decreases(resources(X2,X3))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X1),resilience(X0))
      | ~ subpopulations(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i,X3: $i] :
      ( constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X0,X3),disbanding_rate(X1,X3)))
      | ~ environment(X2)
      | ~ constant(resources(X2,X3))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X1),resilience(X0))
      | ~ subpopulations(X0,X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

tcf(c_62,plain,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_63,negated_conjecture,
    environment(sk1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

tcf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | constant(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

tcf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    ( constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | ~ increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f10]) ).

tcf(c_118,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( constant(difference(disbanding_rate(X0,X2),disbanding_rate(X1,X2)))
      | ~ constant(resources(sk1,X2))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X1),resilience(X0))
      | ~ subpopulations(X0,X1,sk1,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_61,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_132,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(X0,X2),disbanding_rate(X1,X2)))
      | ~ decreases(resources(sk1,X2))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X1),resilience(X0))
      | ~ subpopulations(X0,X1,sk1,X2) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_60,c_63]) ).

tcf(c_154,plain,
    ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_132]) ).

tcf(c_155,plain,
    ( increases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_154,c_62,c_154]) ).

tcf(c_163,plain,
    ( constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | ~ constant(resources(sk1,sk2))
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_118]) ).

tcf(c_164,plain,
    constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_62,c_65,c_67,c_154,c_163]) ).

tcf(c_172,plain,
    ( decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2)))
    | ~ decreases(resources(sk1,sk2)) ),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_155,c_68]) ).

tcf(c_173,plain,
    decreases(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_172,c_66,c_172]) ).

tcf(c_186,plain,
    ~ constant(difference(disbanding_rate(first_movers,sk2),disbanding_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))),
    inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c_59,c_173]) ).

tcf(c_187,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_186,c_164]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT022-2 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:05:40 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.40  
% 0.12/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.42  % Proving...
% 1.17/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 1.17/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 1.17/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s% 
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.17/1.26  
% 1.17/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 1.17/1.27  
% 1.17/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------