↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT023+2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:45 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.40s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT023+2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:06:45 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AI
% 0.13/0.39  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.39  #
% 0.13/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.39  # Number of axioms: 17 Number of unprocessed: 17
% 0.13/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.39  # 17 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 3 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.39  # There are 3 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.39  # Found 3 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.39  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.39  # 3 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.39  # 14 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.39  # 3 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.39  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 3
% 0.13/0.39  # Returning from population with 16 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.39  # We now have 16 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.40  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.13/0.40  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.40  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.40  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_17, negated_conjecture, (environment(esk5_0))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (stable(esk5_0))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(esk5_0,critical_point(esk5_0)))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_14, hypothesis, (in_environment(X1,esk4_1(X1))|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_6, plain, (greater_or_equal(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)|in_environment(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_11, hypothesis, (X1=critical_point(X2)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|greater(esk3_2(X2,X1),X1)|~in_environment(X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))|in_environment(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_3, plain, (in_environment(X1,esk2_1(X1))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk1_2(X1,X2)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk1_2(X1,X2)))|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_2, plain, (~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk1_2(X1,X2)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk1_2(X1,X2)))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_1(X1)))|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_5, plain, (greater_or_equal(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2)|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_1(X1)))|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_13, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~stable(X2)|~greater_or_equal(X1,esk4_1(X2))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk1_2(X1,X2))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_1(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_1(X1)))|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_10, hypothesis, (X1=critical_point(X2)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk3_2(X2,X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk3_2(X2,X1)))|~in_environment(X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_12, hypothesis, (X1=critical_point(X2)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,esk3_2(X2,X1))|~in_environment(X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_4, plain, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|greater_or_equal(esk1_2(X2,X3),X3)|~greater(X1,esk2_1(X2))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~in_environment(X2,X3)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk1_2(X2,X3)),growth_rate(first_movers,esk1_2(X2,X3)))|~greater(X1,esk2_1(X2))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~in_environment(X2,X3)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,esk1_2(X2,X3))|~greater(X1,esk2_1(X2))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~in_environment(X2,X3)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_346, plain, (X16=X16)).
% 0.13/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.40  # Found 6 steps
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_346, plain, (esk5_0=esk5_0), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_426, plain, (esk5_0=esk5_0), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_350])).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_501, plain, (~environment(esk5_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_499, plain, (environment(esk5_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_14])).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_503, plain, (~stable(esk5_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_16])).
% 0.13/0.40  cnf(i_0_502, plain, (in_environment(esk5_0,esk4_1(esk5_0))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_502, ...])).
% 0.13/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.40  # Child (1630722) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.40  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------