↑ Up

CSE---1.7.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE---1.7
% Problem  : MGT023-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:04:16 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 117.59s 117.70s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem    : MGT023-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.34  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.06/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.06/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Sep  7 12:07:53 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.24/0.51  start to proof:theBenchmark
% 117.48/117.69  %-------------------------------------------
% 117.48/117.69  % File        :CSE---1.7
% 117.48/117.69  % Problem     :theBenchmark
% 117.48/117.69  % Transform   :cnf
% 117.48/117.69  % Format      :tptp:raw
% 117.48/117.69  % Command     :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 117.48/117.69  
% 117.48/117.69  % Result      :Theorem 117.192399s
% 117.48/117.69  % Output      :CNFRefutation 117.192399s
% 117.48/117.69  %-------------------------------------------
% 117.48/117.69  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 117.48/117.69  % File     : MGT023-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 117.48/117.69  % Domain   : Management (Organisation Theory)
% 117.48/117.69  % Problem  : Stable environments have a critical point.
% 117.48/117.69  % Version  : [PB+94] axioms : Reduced & Augmented > Complete.
% 117.48/117.69  % English  :
% 117.48/117.69  
% 117.48/117.69  % Refs     : [PM93]  Peli & Masuch (1993), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 117.48/117.69  %          : [PM94]  Peli & Masuch (1994), The Logic of Propogation Strateg
% 117.48/117.69  %          : [Kam95] Kamps (1995), Email to G. Sutcliffe
% 117.48/117.69  % Source   : [TPTP]
% 117.48/117.69  % Names    :
% 117.48/117.69  
% 117.48/117.69  % Status   : Unsatisfiable
% 117.48/117.69  % Rating   : 0.08 v9.3.0, 0.05 v9.0.0, 0.10 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.5.0, 0.05 v7.4.0, 0.06 v7.3.0, 0.08 v7.1.0, 0.00 v7.0.0, 0.07 v6.4.0, 0.00 v6.3.0, 0.09 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.07 v6.0.0, 0.00 v5.5.0, 0.05 v5.4.0, 0.10 v5.3.0, 0.06 v5.2.0, 0.00 v3.4.0, 0.08 v3.3.0, 0.14 v3.2.0, 0.15 v3.1.0, 0.18 v2.7.0, 0.17 v2.6.0, 0.11 v2.4.0
% 117.48/117.69  % Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   3 unt;   3 nHn;   9 RR)
% 117.48/117.69  %            Number of literals    :   29 (   3 equ;  17 neg)
% 117.48/117.69  %            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   3 avg)
% 117.48/117.69  %            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
% 117.48/117.69  %            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   0 prp; 1-4 aty)
% 117.48/117.69  %            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
% 117.48/117.69  %            Number of variables   :   10 (   0 sgn)
% 117.48/117.69  % SPC      : CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN
% 117.48/117.69  
% 117.48/117.69  % Comments : Created with tptp2X -f tptp -t clausify:otter MGT023+1.p
% 117.48/117.69  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 117.48/117.69  cnf(d1_17,hypothesis,
% 117.48/117.69      ( ~ environment(A)
% 117.48/117.69      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B))
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 117.48/117.70      | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,sk1(B,A))
% 117.48/117.70      | B = critical_point(A) ) ).
% 117.48/117.70  
% 117.48/117.70  cnf(d1_18,hypothesis,
% 117.48/117.70      ( ~ environment(A)
% 117.48/117.70      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B))
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 117.48/117.70      | greater(sk1(B,A),B)
% 117.48/117.70      | B = critical_point(A) ) ).
% 117.48/117.70  
% 117.48/117.70  cnf(d1_19,hypothesis,
% 117.48/117.70      ( ~ environment(A)
% 117.48/117.70      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B))
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ in_environment(A,B)
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(B,A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(B,A)))
% 117.48/117.70      | B = critical_point(A) ) ).
% 117.48/117.70  
% 117.48/117.70  cnf(l12_20,hypothesis,
% 117.48/117.70      ( ~ environment(A)
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ stable(A)
% 117.48/117.70      | in_environment(A,sk2(A)) ) ).
% 117.48/117.70  
% 117.48/117.70  cnf(l12_21,hypothesis,
% 117.48/117.70      ( ~ environment(A)
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ stable(A)
% 117.48/117.70      | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(A))) ) ).
% 117.48/117.70  
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(l12_22,hypothesis,
% 117.59/117.70      ( ~ environment(A)
% 117.59/117.70      | ~ stable(A)
% 117.59/117.70      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
% 117.59/117.70      | ~ greater(B,sk2(A))
% 117.59/117.70      | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)) ) ).
% 117.59/117.70  
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(prove_l5_23,negated_conjecture,
% 117.59/117.70      environment(sk3) ).
% 117.59/117.70  
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(prove_l5_24,negated_conjecture,
% 117.59/117.70      stable(sk3) ).
% 117.59/117.70  
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(prove_l5_25,negated_conjecture,
% 117.59/117.70      ~ in_environment(sk3,critical_point(sk3)) ).
% 117.59/117.70  
% 117.59/117.70  %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 117.59/117.70  %-------------------------------------------
% 117.59/117.70  % Proof found
% 117.59/117.70  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 117.59/117.70  % SZS output start Proof
% 117.59/117.70  %ClaNum:28(EqnAxiom:19)
% 117.59/117.70  %VarNum:47(SingletonVarNum:10)
% 117.59/117.70  %MaxLitNum:5
% 117.59/117.70  %MaxfuncDepth:2
% 117.59/117.70  %SharedTerms:7
% 117.59/117.70  %goalClause: 20 21 22
% 117.59/117.70  %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 117.59/117.70  [20]P1(a1)
% 117.59/117.70  [21]P2(a1)
% 117.59/117.70  [22]~P3(a1,f2(a1))
% 117.59/117.70  [23]~P1(x231)+~P2(x231)+P3(x231,f3(x231))
% 117.59/117.70  [25]~P2(x251)+~P1(x251)+~P4(f6(a5,f3(x251)),f6(a7,f3(x251)))
% 117.59/117.70  [24]~P1(x242)+~P3(x242,x241)+P4(f4(x241,x242),x241)+E(x241,f2(x242))+P4(f6(a5,x241),f6(a7,x241))
% 117.59/117.70  [27]~P1(x272)+~P3(x272,x271)+E(x271,f2(x272))+P5(a7,a5,x272,f4(x271,x272))+P4(f6(a5,x271),f6(a7,x271))
% 117.59/117.70  [28]~P2(x282)+~P1(x282)+~P4(x281,f3(x282))+~P5(a7,a5,x282,x281)+P4(f6(a5,x281),f6(a7,x281))
% 117.59/117.70  [26]~P1(x262)+~P3(x262,x261)+E(x261,f2(x262))+P4(f6(a5,x261),f6(a7,x261))+~P4(f6(a5,f4(x261,x262)),f6(a7,f4(x261,x262)))
% 117.59/117.70  %EqnAxiom
% 117.59/117.70  [1]E(x11,x11)
% 117.59/117.70  [2]E(x22,x21)+~E(x21,x22)
% 117.59/117.70  [3]E(x31,x33)+~E(x31,x32)+~E(x32,x33)
% 117.59/117.70  [4]~E(x41,x42)+E(f2(x41),f2(x42))
% 117.59/117.70  [5]~E(x51,x52)+E(f3(x51),f3(x52))
% 117.59/117.70  [6]~E(x61,x62)+E(f6(x61,x63),f6(x62,x63))
% 117.59/117.70  [7]~E(x71,x72)+E(f6(x73,x71),f6(x73,x72))
% 117.59/117.70  [8]~E(x81,x82)+E(f4(x81,x83),f4(x82,x83))
% 117.59/117.70  [9]~E(x91,x92)+E(f4(x93,x91),f4(x93,x92))
% 117.59/117.70  [10]~P1(x101)+P1(x102)+~E(x101,x102)
% 117.59/117.70  [11]~P2(x111)+P2(x112)+~E(x111,x112)
% 117.59/117.70  [12]P3(x122,x123)+~E(x121,x122)+~P3(x121,x123)
% 117.59/117.70  [13]P3(x133,x132)+~E(x131,x132)+~P3(x133,x131)
% 117.59/117.70  [14]P4(x142,x143)+~E(x141,x142)+~P4(x141,x143)
% 117.59/117.70  [15]P4(x153,x152)+~E(x151,x152)+~P4(x153,x151)
% 117.59/117.70  [16]P5(x162,x163,x164,x165)+~E(x161,x162)+~P5(x161,x163,x164,x165)
% 117.59/117.70  [17]P5(x173,x172,x174,x175)+~E(x171,x172)+~P5(x173,x171,x174,x175)
% 117.59/117.70  [18]P5(x183,x184,x182,x185)+~E(x181,x182)+~P5(x183,x184,x181,x185)
% 117.59/117.70  [19]P5(x193,x194,x195,x192)+~E(x191,x192)+~P5(x193,x194,x195,x191)
% 117.59/117.70  
% 117.59/117.70  %-------------------------------------------
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(37,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (~E(x371,a1)+P1(x371)),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,10,2])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(39,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (~E(x391,a1)+P2(x391)),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,11,2])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(41,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P3(a1,f3(a1))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,23,39])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(42,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (~E(f3(a1),f2(a1))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[22,41,13])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(48,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P4(x481,f3(a1))+~E(f4(f3(a1),a1),x481)+P4(f6(a5,f3(a1)),f6(a7,f3(a1)))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[42,20,41,14,24])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(49,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P4(f4(f3(a1),a1),f3(a1))+P4(f6(a5,f3(a1)),f6(a7,f3(a1)))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(equality_inference,[],[48])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(50,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P4(f4(f3(a1),a1),f3(a1))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,21,49,25])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(57,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P5(x571,a5,a1,f4(f3(a1),a1))+~E(a7,x571)+P4(f6(a5,f3(a1)),f6(a7,f3(a1)))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[42,20,41,16,27])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(58,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P4(f6(a5,f3(a1)),f6(a7,f3(a1)))+P5(a7,a5,a1,f4(f3(a1),a1))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(equality_inference,[],[57])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(59,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P5(a7,a5,a1,f4(f3(a1),a1))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[20,21,58,25])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(69,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (~P4(f6(a5,f3(a1)),f6(a7,f3(a1)))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,37,25])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(80,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (~P4(f6(a5,f4(f3(a1),a1)),f6(a7,f4(f3(a1),a1)))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[69,42,41,37,26])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(863,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (~E(a1,x8631)+P2(x8631)),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[21,22,12,11])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(906,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     (P4(f6(a5,f4(f3(a1),a1)),f6(a7,f4(f3(a1),a1)))),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[59,50,20,863,28])).
% 117.59/117.70  cnf(978,plain,
% 117.59/117.70     ($false),
% 117.59/117.70     inference(scs_inference,[],[80,906]),
% 117.59/117.70     ['proof']).
% 117.59/117.70  % SZS output end Proof
% 117.59/117.70  % Total time :117.192399s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------