↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : MGT023-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:47:09 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.25s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.25s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (   8 unt;   8 nHn;  23 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   72 (   9 equ;  42 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(d1_17,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk1(X2,X1))
    | X2 = critical_point(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_17) ).

cnf(l12_20,hypothesis,
    ( in_environment(X1,sk2(X1))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_20) ).

cnf(l12_21,hypothesis,
    ( ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_21) ).

cnf(l12_22,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,sk2(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',l12_22) ).

cnf(d1_19,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | X2 = critical_point(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(X2,X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(X2,X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_19) ).

cnf(d1_18,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | greater(sk1(X2,X1),X2)
    | X2 = critical_point(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d1_18) ).

cnf(prove_l5_25,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in_environment(sk3,critical_point(sk3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l5_25) ).

cnf(prove_l5_24,negated_conjecture,
    stable(sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l5_24) ).

cnf(prove_l5_23,negated_conjecture,
    environment(sk3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_l5_23) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk1(X2,X1))
    | X2 = critical_point(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2) ),
    d1_17 ).

cnf(c_0_10,hypothesis,
    ( in_environment(X1,sk2(X1))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1) ),
    l12_20 ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(X1))) ),
    l12_21 ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(X2,sk2(X1)) ),
    l12_22 ).

cnf(c_0_13,hypothesis,
    ( critical_point(X1) = sk2(X1)
    | subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk1(sk2(X1),X1))
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | X2 = critical_point(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(X2,X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(X2,X1))) ),
    d1_19 ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ( critical_point(X1) = sk2(X1)
    | greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk2(X1),X1)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk2(X1),X1)))
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ greater(sk1(sk2(X1),X1),sk2(X1))
    | ~ environment(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    ( greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))
    | greater(sk1(X2,X1),X2)
    | X2 = critical_point(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2) ),
    d1_18 ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in_environment(sk3,critical_point(sk3)),
    prove_l5_25 ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( critical_point(X1) = sk2(X1)
    | ~ stable(X1)
    | ~ environment(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]),c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    stable(sk3),
    prove_l5_24 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    environment(sk3),
    prove_l5_23 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ in_environment(sk3,sk2(sk3)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_10]),c_0_19]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : MGT023-1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.13/0.32  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:27:26 EDT 2026
% 0.13/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.25/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.25/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.25/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.25/1.71  % Total time : 1.368s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------