↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT026-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:49 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.22s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT026-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.07/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.34  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.07/0.34  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.07/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.07/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:12:26 UTC 2026
% 0.07/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.47  
% 0.22/0.47  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.47  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.47  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.47  SPASS derived 119 clauses, backtracked 21 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 124 clauses.
% 0.22/0.47  SPASS allocated 75794 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.47  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.47  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.22/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.47  		0:00:00.02 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.47  
% 0.22/0.47  
% 0.22/0.47  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 66 :
% 0.22/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.47  1[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater(growth_rate(v,w),growth_rate(x,w)) subpopulations(x,v,u,w)* -> selection_favors(v,x,w).
% 0.22/0.47  2[0:Inp] environment(u) || equal(cardinality_at_time(v,w),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(x,w),zero)+ subpopulation(v,u,w)* subpopulation(x,u,w)* -> selection_favors(x,v,w)*.
% 0.22/0.47  3[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,v),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,v),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)*.
% 0.22/0.47  4[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v)*+ -> greater_or_equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,v),zero)*.
% 0.22/0.47  5[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> subpopulation(first_movers,u,v)*.
% 0.22/0.47  6[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,v)*.
% 0.22/0.47  7[0:Inp] environment(u) ||  -> greater_or_equal(critical_point(u),appear(efficient_producers,u))*.
% 0.22/0.47  8[0:Inp] || greater(u,v)* greater(v,w)* -> greater(u,w)*.
% 0.22/0.47  9[0:Inp] || greater_or_equal(u,v)* -> equal(u,v) greater(u,v).
% 0.22/0.47  10[0:Inp] || greater(u,v) -> greater_or_equal(u,v)*.
% 0.22/0.47  13[0:Inp] environment(u) || greater(v,w)*+ equal(w,critical_point(u))* subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)* -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,v),growth_rate(first_movers,v)).
% 0.22/0.47  14[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) greater_or_equal(v,appear(efficient_producers,u))* -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,v),zero).
% 0.22/0.47  15[0:Inp] ||  -> environment(sk1)*.
% 0.22/0.47  16[0:Inp] ||  -> in_environment(sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  17[0:Inp] ||  -> greater(sk2,critical_point(sk1))*r.
% 0.22/0.47  18[0:Inp] || selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  27[0:Res:15.0,6.0] || in_environment(sk1,u) -> subpopulation(efficient_producers,sk1,u)*.
% 0.22/0.47  28[0:Res:15.0,7.0] ||  -> greater_or_equal(critical_point(sk1),appear(efficient_producers,sk1))*.
% 0.22/0.47  29[0:Res:16.0,3.1] environment(sk1) || greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  30[0:Res:16.0,14.1] environment(sk1) || greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,sk1))* -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero).
% 0.22/0.47  31[0:Res:16.0,4.1] environment(sk1) ||  -> greater_or_equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero)*.
% 0.22/0.47  32[0:Res:16.0,5.1] environment(sk1) ||  -> subpopulation(first_movers,sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  35[0:Res:2.5,18.0] environment(u) || equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) subpopulation(first_movers,u,sk2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  36[0:MRR:32.0,15.0] ||  -> subpopulation(first_movers,sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  38[0:MRR:31.0,15.0] ||  -> greater_or_equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero)*.
% 0.22/0.47  39[0:MRR:30.0,15.0] || greater_or_equal(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,sk1))* -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero).
% 0.22/0.47  40[0:MRR:29.0,15.0] || greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  42[0:Res:38.0,9.0] ||  -> equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  44[0:Res:28.0,9.0] ||  -> equal(appear(efficient_producers,sk1),critical_point(sk1)) greater(critical_point(sk1),appear(efficient_producers,sk1))*r.
% 0.22/0.47  45[0:Res:7.1,9.0] environment(u) ||  -> equal(appear(efficient_producers,u),critical_point(u)) greater(critical_point(u),appear(efficient_producers,u))*r.
% 0.22/0.47  48[1:Spt:42.0] ||  -> equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero)**.
% 0.22/0.47  51[1:Rew:48.0,35.1] environment(u) || equal(zero,zero) greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) subpopulation(first_movers,u,sk2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  52[1:Obv:51.1] environment(u) || greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) subpopulation(first_movers,u,sk2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  56[0:Res:10.1,39.0] || greater(sk2,appear(efficient_producers,sk1))*r -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero).
% 0.22/0.47  58[2:Spt:44.0] ||  -> equal(appear(efficient_producers,sk1),critical_point(sk1))**.
% 0.22/0.47  63[2:Rew:58.0,56.0] || greater(sk2,critical_point(sk1)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  64[2:MRR:63.0,17.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  66[2:MRR:52.1,64.0] environment(u) || subpopulation(first_movers,u,sk2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  76[2:Res:27.1,66.2] environment(sk1) || in_environment(sk1,sk2) subpopulation(first_movers,sk1,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  80[2:SSi:76.0,15.0] || in_environment(sk1,sk2) subpopulation(first_movers,sk1,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  81[2:MRR:80.0,80.1,16.0,36.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.47  84[2:Spt:81.0,44.0,58.0] || equal(appear(efficient_producers,sk1),critical_point(sk1))** -> .
% 0.22/0.47  85[2:Spt:81.0,44.1] ||  -> greater(critical_point(sk1),appear(efficient_producers,sk1))*r.
% 0.22/0.47  98[2:NCh:8.2,8.1,56.0,85.0] || greater(sk2,critical_point(sk1)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  100[0:NCh:8.2,8.1,56.0,45.2] environment(sk1) || greater(sk2,critical_point(sk1)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) equal(appear(efficient_producers,sk1),critical_point(sk1))**.
% 0.22/0.47  102[2:MRR:98.0,17.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  103[2:MRR:52.1,102.0] environment(u) || subpopulation(first_movers,u,sk2) subpopulation(efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  123[2:Res:27.1,103.2] environment(sk1) || in_environment(sk1,sk2) subpopulation(first_movers,sk1,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  127[2:SSi:123.0,15.0] || in_environment(sk1,sk2) subpopulation(first_movers,sk1,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  128[2:MRR:127.0,127.1,16.0,36.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.47  131[1:Spt:128.0,42.0,48.0] || equal(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero)** -> .
% 0.22/0.47  132[1:Spt:128.0,42.1] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(first_movers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  134[1:MRR:40.1,132.0] || greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  135[0:SSi:100.0,15.0] || greater(sk2,critical_point(sk1)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) equal(appear(efficient_producers,sk1),critical_point(sk1))**.
% 0.22/0.47  136[0:MRR:135.0,17.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero) equal(appear(efficient_producers,sk1),critical_point(sk1))**.
% 0.22/0.47  139[0:Rew:136.1,56.0] || greater(sk2,critical_point(sk1)) -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  140[0:MRR:139.0,17.0] ||  -> greater(cardinality_at_time(efficient_producers,sk2),zero)*l.
% 0.22/0.47  141[1:MRR:134.0,140.0] ||  -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  147[1:Res:141.0,1.2] environment(sk1) || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2)) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  148[1:SSi:147.0,15.0] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2)) -> selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk2)*.
% 0.22/0.47  149[1:MRR:148.1,18.0] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2))*l -> .
% 0.22/0.47  150[0:Res:17.0,13.1] environment(u) || equal(critical_point(sk1),critical_point(u)) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2)).
% 0.22/0.47  168[1:MRR:150.3,149.0] environment(u) || equal(critical_point(sk1),critical_point(u)) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,sk2)* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  178[1:Res:141.0,168.2] environment(sk1) || equal(critical_point(sk1),critical_point(sk1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.47  179[1:Obv:178.1] environment(sk1) ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.47  180[1:SSi:179.0,15.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.48  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.48  Formulae used in the proof : mp1_high_growth_rates_28 mp2_favour_members_29 mp_non_empty_fm_and_ep_30 mp_first_movers_exist_31 mp_subpopulations_32 mp_subpopulations_33 mp_critical_point_after_EP_34 mp_greater_transitivity_35 mp_greater_or_equal_36 mp_greater_or_equal_37 d1_40 t6_41 prove_l8_42 prove_l8_43 prove_l8_44 prove_l8_45
% 0.22/0.48  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------