↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.54s
% Output   : Refutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09  % Problem  : MGT030+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.10  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 08:23:37 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.30  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.09/0.30  The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.09/0.30  Thu Jun  9 08:23:37 2022
% 0.09/0.30  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 26788.
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.09/0.30  set(auto).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.09/0.30  clear(print_given).
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  formula_list(usable).
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.09/0.30  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.09/0.30  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.09/0.30     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  ------------> process usable:
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  ------------> process sos:
% 0.09/0.30  
% 0.09/0.30  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.33  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.33  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.33  number of clauses in intial UL: 14
% 0.13/0.33  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.13/0.33  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 0.13/0.33  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.33  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 93
% 0.13/0.33  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.13/0.33     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.13/0.33     distinct function count: 5
% 0.13/0.33     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.33  
% 0.13/0.33  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.13/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Model 3 [ 1 0 157 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Model 4 [ 1 0 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.22 sec ----> 76 [hyper,73,8,15,17,72] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Length of proof is 33.  Level of proof is 19.
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.13/0.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.13/0.54  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  1 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,$f1(A,B))|in_environment(A,$f2(A)).
% 0.13/0.54  2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,$f1(A,B))| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2(A))).
% 0.13/0.54  3 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,$f1(A,B))| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)| -greater(C,$f2(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)).
% 0.13/0.54  4 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal($f1(A,B),B)|in_environment(A,$f2(A)).
% 0.13/0.54  5 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal($f1(A,B),B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2(A))).
% 0.13/0.54  6 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal($f1(A,B),B)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)| -greater(C,$f2(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)).
% 0.13/0.54  7 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1(A,B)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1(A,B)))|in_environment(A,$f2(A)).
% 0.13/0.54  8 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1(A,B)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1(A,B)))| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2(A))).
% 0.13/0.54  9 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1(A,B)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1(A,B)))| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)| -greater(C,$f2(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)).
% 0.13/0.54  10 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)|in_environment(A,$f3(A)).
% 0.13/0.54  11 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -greater_or_equal(B,$f3(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)).
% 0.13/0.54  12 [] {+} -in_environment($c1,A)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4(A)).
% 0.13/0.54  13 [] {+} -in_environment($c1,A)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))|greater($f4(A),A).
% 0.13/0.54  14 [] {+} -in_environment($c1,A)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f4(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f4(A))).
% 0.13/0.54  15 [] {+} environment($c1).
% 0.13/0.54  16 [] {+} stable($c1).
% 0.13/0.54  17 [hyper,16,10,15] {+} in_environment($c1,$f3($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  20 [hyper,17,4,15] {+} greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1))|in_environment($c1,$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  21 [hyper,17,1,15] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|in_environment($c1,$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  22 [hyper,20,13] {+} greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  23 [hyper,20,12] {+} greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  24 [hyper,21,13] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  25 [hyper,21,12] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  29 [hyper,24,2,15,17,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  33 [hyper,25,2,15,17,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  34 [hyper,33,11,15,16,23,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  38 [hyper,33,3,15,17,29,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f4($f2($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f4($f2($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  39 [hyper,38,14,21,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  43 [hyper,39,2,15,17,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  44 [hyper,34,7,15,17] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|in_environment($c1,$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  47 [hyper,43,11,15,16,22] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  49 [hyper,44,12,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  51 [hyper,49,5,15,17] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1)))|greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  52 [hyper,51,11,15,16,43] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  53 [hyper,47,7,15,17] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1))|in_environment($c1,$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  56 [hyper,53,13,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  58 [hyper,56,5,15,17] {+} greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1))|greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  59 [hyper,58,11,15,16,43] {+} greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  60 [hyper,59,8,15,17,56,factor_simp] {+} greater($f4($f2($c1)),$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  61 [hyper,52,8,15,17,49,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,$c1,$f4($f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  63 [hyper,61,6,15,17,60] {+} greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f4($f2($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f4($f2($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  64 [hyper,63,11,15,16,43] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f4($f2($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f4($f2($c1))))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  65 [hyper,64,14,20] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  66 [hyper,64,9,15,17,61,60,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f4($f2($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f4($f2($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  67 [hyper,65,11,15,16,43,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  69 [hyper,67,7,15,17] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1)))|in_environment($c1,$f2($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  71 [hyper,67,5,15,17] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))))|greater_or_equal($f1($c1,$f3($c1)),$f3($c1)).
% 0.13/0.54  72 [hyper,69,14,66,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f2($c1)),growth_rate(first_movers,$f2($c1))).
% 0.13/0.54  73 [hyper,71,11,15,16,43,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1))),growth_rate(first_movers,$f1($c1,$f3($c1)))).
% 0.13/0.54  76 [hyper,73,8,15,17,72] {-} $F.
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.13/0.54  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  ============ end of search ============
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  true clauses given          35      (89.7%)
% 0.13/0.54  false clauses given          4
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.13/0.54  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Model 4 [ 1 0 155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.13/0.54  
% 0.13/0.54  Process 26788 finished Thu Jun  9 08:23:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------