↑ Up

SPASS---3.9.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : MGT030+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:50 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.22s 0.52s
% Output   : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT030+1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:18:00 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.22/0.52  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.22/0.52  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.22/0.52  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.22/0.52  SPASS derived 47 clauses, backtracked 9 clauses, performed 2 splits and kept 57 clauses.
% 0.22/0.52  SPASS allocated 97655 KBytes.
% 0.22/0.52  SPASS spent	0:00:00.15 on the problem.
% 0.22/0.52  		0:00:00.06 for the input.
% 0.22/0.52  		0:00:00.04 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.22/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.22/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.22/0.52  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  
% 0.22/0.52  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 41 :
% 0.22/0.52  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.22/0.52  1[0:Inp] ||  -> environment(skc1)*.
% 0.22/0.52  2[0:Inp] ||  -> stable(skc1)*.
% 0.22/0.52  3[0:Inp] SkP0(u) ||  -> in_environment(u,skf5(u))*.
% 0.22/0.52  4[0:Inp] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skf4(u)),growth_rate(first_movers,skf4(u)))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  5[0:Inp] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skf5(u)),growth_rate(first_movers,skf5(u)))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  6[0:Inp] stable(u) environment(u) ||  -> in_environment(u,skf8(u))*.
% 0.22/0.52  7[0:Inp] || greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skf6(u,v)),growth_rate(first_movers,skf6(u,v)))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  8[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> SkP0(u) greater_or_equal(skf6(v,u),v)*.
% 0.22/0.52  9[0:Inp] || in_environment(skc1,u) -> greater(skf4(u),u) greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,u),growth_rate(first_movers,u))*.
% 0.22/0.52  10[0:Inp] environment(u) || in_environment(u,v) -> SkP0(u) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,skf6(v,u))*.
% 0.22/0.52  11[0:Inp] || in_environment(skc1,u) -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,u),growth_rate(first_movers,u))* subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc1,skf4(u)).
% 0.22/0.52  12[0:Inp] SkP0(u) || greater(v,skf5(u)) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)*+ -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,v),growth_rate(first_movers,v))*.
% 0.22/0.52  13[0:Inp] stable(u) environment(u) || greater_or_equal(v,skf8(u)) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,v)*+ -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,v),growth_rate(first_movers,v))*.
% 0.22/0.52  15[0:Res:2.0,6.1] environment(skc1) ||  -> in_environment(skc1,skf8(skc1))*.
% 0.22/0.52  17[0:Res:1.0,10.0] || in_environment(skc1,u) -> SkP0(skc1) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc1,skf6(u,skc1))*.
% 0.22/0.52  18[0:Res:1.0,8.0] || in_environment(skc1,u) -> SkP0(skc1) greater_or_equal(skf6(u,skc1),u)*.
% 0.22/0.52  23[0:Res:12.3,4.0] SkP0(u) || greater(skf4(v),skf5(u)) subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,u,skf4(v))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  24[0:Res:9.2,5.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(u)) -> greater(skf4(skf5(u)),skf5(u))*.
% 0.22/0.52  27[0:MRR:15.0,1.0] ||  -> in_environment(skc1,skf8(skc1))*.
% 0.22/0.52  35[1:Spt:18.0,18.2] || in_environment(skc1,u) -> greater_or_equal(skf6(u,skc1),u)*.
% 0.22/0.52  36[2:Spt:17.0,17.2] || in_environment(skc1,u) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc1,skf6(u,skc1))*.
% 0.22/0.52  41[0:Res:11.1,5.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(u)) -> subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,skc1,skf4(skf5(u)))*.
% 0.22/0.52  44[0:Res:41.1,23.2] SkP0(skc1) || in_environment(skc1,skf5(u)) greater(skf4(skf5(u)),skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  52[2:Res:36.1,13.3] stable(skc1) environment(skc1) || in_environment(skc1,u) greater_or_equal(skf6(u,skc1),skf8(skc1)) -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skf6(u,skc1)),growth_rate(first_movers,skf6(u,skc1)))*.
% 0.22/0.52  57[2:SSi:52.1,52.0,2.0,1.0,2.0,1.0] || in_environment(skc1,u) greater_or_equal(skf6(u,skc1),skf8(skc1)) -> greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,skf6(u,skc1)),growth_rate(first_movers,skf6(u,skc1)))*.
% 0.22/0.52  58[2:MRR:57.2,7.0] || in_environment(skc1,u) greater_or_equal(skf6(u,skc1),skf8(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  67[2:Res:35.1,58.1] || in_environment(skc1,skf8(skc1))* in_environment(skc1,skf8(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  69[2:Obv:67.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf8(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  70[2:MRR:69.0,27.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.52  78[2:Spt:70.0,17.1] ||  -> SkP0(skc1)*.
% 0.22/0.52  79[2:MRR:44.0,78.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(u)) greater(skf4(skf5(u)),skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  82[2:Res:24.1,79.1] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(skc1))* in_environment(skc1,skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  83[2:Obv:82.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  87[2:Res:3.1,83.0] SkP0(skc1) ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.52  88[2:SSi:87.0,2.0,1.0,78.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.52  89[1:Spt:88.0,18.1] ||  -> SkP0(skc1)*.
% 0.22/0.52  90[1:MRR:44.0,89.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(u)) greater(skf4(skf5(u)),skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  93[1:Res:24.1,90.1] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(skc1))* in_environment(skc1,skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  94[1:Obv:93.0] || in_environment(skc1,skf5(skc1))* -> .
% 0.22/0.52  95[1:Res:3.1,94.0] SkP0(skc1) ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.52  96[1:SSi:95.0,2.0,1.0,89.0] ||  -> .
% 0.22/0.52  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.22/0.52  Formulae used in the proof : prove_l12 l1 mp_earliest_time_growth_rate_exceeds
% 0.22/0.52  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------