↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : MGT030-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sun Jul 17 22:25:53 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.59s 0.85s
% Output   : Refutation 0.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.09  % Problem  : MGT030-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.03/0.09  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.09/0.28  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.28  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.28  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.28  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.28  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.28  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.09/0.28  % DateTime : Thu Jun  9 11:22:37 EDT 2022
% 0.09/0.28  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.29  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.09/0.29  The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.09/0.29  Thu Jun  9 11:22:37 2022
% 0.09/0.29  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 24594.
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.09/0.29  set(auto).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.09/0.29  clear(print_given).
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  list(usable).
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.09/0.29  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.09/0.29  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.09/0.29     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  ------------> process usable:
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  ------------> process sos:
% 0.09/0.29  
% 0.09/0.29  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.50  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.50  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.50  number of clauses in intial UL: 14
% 0.13/0.50  number of clauses initially in problem: 16
% 0.13/0.50  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 87
% 0.13/0.50  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.50  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 93
% 0.13/0.50  absolute distinct symbol count: 14
% 0.13/0.50     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.13/0.50     distinct function count: 5
% 0.13/0.50     distinct constant count: 3
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.13/0.50  
% 0.13/0.50  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.59/0.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.59/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Model 2 [ 1 1 17491 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.53 sec ----> 76 [hyper,73,8,15,17,72] {-} $F.
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Length of proof is 33.  Level of proof is 19.
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.59/0.85  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.59/0.85  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  1 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,sk1(B,A))|in_environment(A,sk2(A)).
% 0.59/0.85  2 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal(sk1(B,A),B)|in_environment(A,sk2(A)).
% 0.59/0.85  3 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,sk1(B,A))| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(A))).
% 0.59/0.85  4 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,sk1(B,A))| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)| -greater(C,sk2(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)).
% 0.59/0.85  5 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal(sk1(B,A),B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(A))).
% 0.59/0.85  6 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)|greater_or_equal(sk1(B,A),B)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)| -greater(C,sk2(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)).
% 0.59/0.85  7 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(B,A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(B,A)))|in_environment(A,sk2(A)).
% 0.59/0.85  8 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(B,A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(B,A)))| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(A))).
% 0.59/0.85  9 [] {+} -environment(A)| -in_environment(A,B)| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(B,A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(B,A)))| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,C)| -greater(C,sk2(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,C),growth_rate(first_movers,C)).
% 0.59/0.85  10 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)|in_environment(A,sk3(A)).
% 0.59/0.85  11 [] {+} -environment(A)| -stable(A)| -subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)| -greater_or_equal(B,sk3(A))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,B),growth_rate(first_movers,B)).
% 0.59/0.85  12 [] {+} -in_environment(sk4,A)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(A)).
% 0.59/0.85  13 [] {+} -in_environment(sk4,A)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))|greater(sk5(A),A).
% 0.59/0.85  14 [] {+} -in_environment(sk4,A)|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,A),growth_rate(first_movers,A))| -greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(A)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk5(A))).
% 0.59/0.85  15 [] {-} environment(sk4).
% 0.59/0.85  16 [] {-} stable(sk4).
% 0.59/0.85  17 [hyper,16,10,15] {+} in_environment(sk4,sk3(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  20 [hyper,17,2,15] {-} greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4))|in_environment(sk4,sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  21 [hyper,17,1,15] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|in_environment(sk4,sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  22 [hyper,20,13] {+} greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  23 [hyper,20,12] {+} greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  24 [hyper,21,13] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  25 [hyper,21,12] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  29 [hyper,24,3,15,17,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  33 [hyper,25,3,15,17,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  34 [hyper,33,11,15,16,23,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  38 [hyper,29,4,15,17,33,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(sk2(sk4))),growth_rate(first_movers,sk5(sk2(sk4)))).
% 0.59/0.85  39 [hyper,38,14,21,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  43 [hyper,39,3,15,17,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  44 [hyper,34,7,15,17] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|in_environment(sk4,sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  47 [hyper,43,11,15,16,22] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  49 [hyper,44,12,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  51 [hyper,49,5,15,17] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4)))|greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  52 [hyper,51,11,15,16,43] {+} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  53 [hyper,47,7,15,17] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4))|in_environment(sk4,sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  56 [hyper,53,13,factor_simp,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  58 [hyper,56,5,15,17] {+} greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4))|greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  59 [hyper,58,11,15,16,43] {+} greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  60 [hyper,59,8,15,17,56,factor_simp] {+} greater(sk5(sk2(sk4)),sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  61 [hyper,52,8,15,17,49,factor_simp] {-} subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk4,sk5(sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  63 [hyper,60,6,15,17,61] {-} greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(sk2(sk4))),growth_rate(first_movers,sk5(sk2(sk4)))).
% 0.59/0.85  64 [hyper,63,11,15,16,43] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(sk2(sk4))),growth_rate(first_movers,sk5(sk2(sk4))))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  65 [hyper,64,14,20] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  66 [hyper,64,9,15,17,61,60,factor_simp] {-} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk5(sk2(sk4))),growth_rate(first_movers,sk5(sk2(sk4)))).
% 0.59/0.85  67 [hyper,65,11,15,16,43,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)))|greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  69 [hyper,67,7,15,17] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4)))|in_environment(sk4,sk2(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  71 [hyper,67,5,15,17] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)))|greater_or_equal(sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4),sk3(sk4)).
% 0.59/0.85  72 [hyper,69,14,66,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2(sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk2(sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  73 [hyper,71,11,15,16,43,factor_simp] {+} greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4)),growth_rate(first_movers,sk1(sk3(sk4),sk4))).
% 0.59/0.85  76 [hyper,73,8,15,17,72] {-} $F.
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.59/0.85  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  ============ end of search ============
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  true clauses given          26      (66.7%)
% 0.59/0.85  false clauses given         13
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.59/0.85  tot:  0         0      (-nan% true)
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Model 2 [ 1 -11 17491 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.59/0.85  
% 0.59/0.85  Process 24594 finished Thu Jun  9 11:22:37 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------