%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem : MGT032-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:31 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.25s 0.52s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : MGT032-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.02 % Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.06/0.32 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.06/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.06/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.06/0.32 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.06/0.32 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.06/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.06/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.06/0.32 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 12:21:11 UTC 2026
% 0.06/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.45 start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.52 % Version : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.25/0.52 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/0.52 % Proof found!
% 0.25/0.52 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.25/0.52 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(l1_3, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))|~environment(X1)|~stable(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,sk1(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', l1_3)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(prove_t1_7, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk3(X1),X1)|~in_environment(sk2,X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t1_7)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(mp1_high_growth_rates_1, axiom, (selection_favors(X3,X2,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~greater(growth_rate(X3,X4),growth_rate(X2,X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp1_high_growth_rates_1)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(prove_t1_8, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,X1)|~selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(X1))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t1_8)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(prove_t1_6, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(X1))|~in_environment(sk2,X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t1_6)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(prove_t1_4, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t1_4)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(prove_t1_5, negated_conjecture, (stable(sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t1_5)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(l1_2, hypothesis, (in_environment(X1,sk1(X1))|~environment(X1)|~stable(X1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', l1_2)).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_8, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))|~environment(X1)|~stable(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,sk1(X1))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l1_3])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk3(X1),X1)|~in_environment(sk2,X1)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_t1_7])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_10, plain, (selection_favors(X3,X2,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~greater(growth_rate(X3,X4),growth_rate(X2,X4))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp1_high_growth_rates_1])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_11, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X2),growth_rate(first_movers,X2))|~environment(X1)|~stable(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)|~greater_or_equal(X2,sk1(X1))), c_0_8).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk3(X1),X1)|~in_environment(sk2,X1)), c_0_9).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,X1)|~selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(X1))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_t1_8])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_14, plain, (selection_favors(X3,X2,X4)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~greater(growth_rate(X3,X4),growth_rate(X2,X4))), c_0_10).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk3(sk1(X1))),growth_rate(first_movers,sk3(sk1(X1))))|~in_environment(sk2,sk1(X1))|~stable(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk3(sk1(X1)))|~environment(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,X1)|~selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(X1))), c_0_13).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(X1))|~in_environment(sk2,X1)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_t1_6])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,sk1(X1))|~stable(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,sk3(sk1(X1)))|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk3(sk1(X1)))|~environment(X2)|~environment(X1)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15]), c_0_16])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(X1))|~in_environment(sk2,X1)), c_0_17).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk2)), prove_t1_4).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,sk1(X1))|~stable(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk3(sk1(X1)))|~environment(X1)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_19]), c_0_20])])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_22, negated_conjecture, (stable(sk2)), prove_t1_5).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_23, hypothesis, (in_environment(X1,sk1(X1))|~environment(X1)|~stable(X1)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[l1_2])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_19]), c_0_22]), c_0_20])])).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_25, hypothesis, (in_environment(X1,sk1(X1))|~environment(X1)|~stable(X1)), c_0_23).
% 0.25/0.52 cnf(c_0_26, hypothesis, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25]), c_0_22]), c_0_20])]), ['proof']).
% 0.25/0.52 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.25/0.52 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.52 % System time : 0.002 s
% 0.25/0.52 % Total time : 0.005 s
% 0.25/0.52 % User time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/0.52 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.25/0.52 % Total time : 0.010 s
% 0.25/0.52
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------