↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.UNS-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT032-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:47 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.39s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT032-2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.08/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:24:37 UTC 2026
% 0.08/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.38  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.38  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.38  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.13/0.38  #
% 0.13/0.38  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.38  # Number of axioms: 8 Number of unprocessed: 8
% 0.13/0.38  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.13/0.38  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.13/0.38  # Hello from C++
% 0.13/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.13/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.13/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.13/0.39  # 8 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.13/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 5 conjectures.
% 0.13/0.39  # There are 5 start rule candidates:
% 0.13/0.39  # Found 2 unit axioms.
% 0.13/0.39  # Unsuccessfully attempted saturation on 1 start tableaux, moving on.
% 0.13/0.39  # 5 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.13/0.39  # 6 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.13/0.39  # 2 unit axiom clauses
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.13/0.39  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 5
% 0.13/0.39  # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.13/0.39  # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.39  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.39  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk2))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (stable(sk2))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,X1)|~selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(X1)))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(X1))|~in_environment(sk2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk3(X1),X1)|~in_environment(sk2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_10, hypothesis, (in_environment(X1,sk1(X1))|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_11, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~greater_or_equal(X1,sk1(X2))|~stable(X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (selection_favors(X1,X2,X3)|~greater(growth_rate(X1,X3),growth_rate(X2,X3))|~subpopulations(X2,X1,X4,X3)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.13/0.39  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.39  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.39  # Found 5 steps
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_24, plain, (environment(sk2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_152, plain, (~stable(sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_151, plain, (in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_163, plain, (greater_or_equal(sk3(sk1(sk2)),sk1(sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_163, ...])).
% 0.13/0.39  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.39  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.39  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.13/0.39  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.13/0.39  # Child (1722840) has found a proof.
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.39  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.39  
% 0.13/0.39  # End clausification derivation
% 0.13/0.39  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk2))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (stable(sk2))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_16, negated_conjecture, (~in_environment(sk2,X1)|~selection_favors(efficient_producers,first_movers,sk3(X1)))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2,sk3(X1))|~in_environment(sk2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_15, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(sk3(X1),X1)|~in_environment(sk2,X1))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_10, hypothesis, (in_environment(X1,sk1(X1))|~stable(X1)|~environment(X1))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_11, hypothesis, (greater(growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1),growth_rate(first_movers,X1))|~greater_or_equal(X1,sk1(X2))|~stable(X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (selection_favors(X1,X2,X3)|~greater(growth_rate(X1,X3),growth_rate(X2,X3))|~subpopulations(X2,X1,X4,X3)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.13/0.39  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.13/0.39  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.13/0.39  # Found 5 steps
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (stable(sk2)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (stable(sk2)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_135, plain, (~environment(sk2)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_12])).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_133, plain, (in_environment(sk2,sk1(sk2))), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_15])).
% 0.13/0.39  cnf(i_0_163, plain, (greater_or_equal(sk3(sk1(sk2)),sk1(sk2))), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_163, ...])).
% 0.13/0.39  # End printing tableau
% 0.13/0.39  # SZS output end
% 0.13/0.39  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.13/0.39  # Proof search is over...
% 0.13/0.39  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------