↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : MGT036+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 04:48:15 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.26s 1.71s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   42 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  131 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  159 (  70   ~;  56   |;  21   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   9  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   12 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (  11 sgn  44   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(d2,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
      ( ( environment(X1)
        & subpopulations(X3,X4,X1,X2) )
     => ( ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X4,X2),zero)
          & greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2)) )
      <=> outcompetes(X4,X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2) ).

fof(mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( environment(X1)
        & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) )
     => subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP) ).

fof(prove_t5,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( environment(X1)
        & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) )
     => ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t5) ).

fof(mp_growth_rate_relationships,axiom,
    ! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
      ( ( ( environment(X1)
          & subpopulations(X3,X4,X1,X2) )
       => greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X2),zero) )
    <=> ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_growth_rate_relationships) ).

fof(a12,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
      ( ( environment(X1)
        & in_environment(X1,X2)
        & ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
        & greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3)) )
     => ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a12) ).

fof(mp_time_point_occur,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( ( environment(X1)
        & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) )
     => in_environment(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_time_point_occur) ).

fof(a2,hypothesis,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2) ).

fof(c_0_7,hypothesis,
    ! [X31,X32,X33,X34] :
      ( ( ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X33,X34),zero)
        | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X32,X34))
        | outcompetes(X33,X32,X34)
        | ~ environment(X31)
        | ~ subpopulations(X32,X33,X31,X34) )
      & ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X33,X34),zero)
        | ~ outcompetes(X33,X32,X34)
        | ~ environment(X31)
        | ~ subpopulations(X32,X33,X31,X34) )
      & ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X32,X34))
        | ~ outcompetes(X33,X32,X34)
        | ~ environment(X31)
        | ~ subpopulations(X32,X33,X31,X34) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X23,X24] :
      ( ~ environment(X23)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X23,X24)
      | subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X23,X24) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP])]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( ( environment(X1)
          & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) )
       => ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_t5])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
      ( ( ( environment(X1)
          & subpopulations(X3,X4,X1,X2) )
       => greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X2),zero) )
    <=> ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_growth_rate_relationships]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))
    | ~ outcompetes(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ environment(X4)
    | ~ subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( environment(esk1_0)
    & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk2_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,plain,
    ! [X27,X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ( environment(X27)
        | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X28,X30)) )
      & ( subpopulations(X28,X29,X27,X30)
        | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X28,X30)) )
      & ( ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X28,X30),zero)
        | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X28,X30)) )
      & ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X28,X30))
        | ~ environment(X27)
        | ~ subpopulations(X28,X29,X27,X30)
        | greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X28,X30),zero) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_10])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1))
    | ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)
    | ~ environment(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    environment(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( environment(X1)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,hypothesis,
    ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
    | ~ outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ environment(X4)
    | ~ subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    environment(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

fof(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X3,X4,X2] :
      ( ( environment(X1)
        & in_environment(X1,X2)
        & ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
        & greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3)) )
     => ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a12]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,hypothesis,
    ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
    | ~ outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subpopulations(X1,X2,X3,X4)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X4)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ! [X35,X36,X37,X38] :
      ( ~ environment(X35)
      | ~ in_environment(X35,X38)
      | greater(zero,growth_rate(X36,X38))
      | ~ greater(resilience(X37),resilience(X36))
      | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X37,X38)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
    | ~ outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,hypothesis,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ in_environment(X1,X2)
    | ~ greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,esk2_0),zero)
    | ~ outcompetes(X1,efficient_producers,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,hypothesis,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
    | ~ greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))
    | ~ in_environment(X4,X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ outcompetes(X1,efficient_producers,esk2_0)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,esk2_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ~ environment(X25)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X25,X26)
      | in_environment(X25,X26) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp_time_point_occur])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,esk2_0))
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(X1))
    | ~ in_environment(X2,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[a2]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( in_environment(X1,X2)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    ~ in_environment(X1,esk2_0),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( in_environment(X1,X2)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,esk2_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_40]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : MGT036+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.32  % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.32  % DateTime   : Mon May  4 23:30:38 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.26/1.71  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.26/1.71  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.26/1.71  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.26/1.71  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------