↑ Up

SATCoP---0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SATCoP---0.1
% Problem  : MGT036+2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : satcop --statistics %s

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:19:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.36s
% Output   : Proof 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (MakeTreeStats fails)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(g0,plain,
    environment(sK0),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t5)]) ).

cnf(g1,plain,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t5)]) ).

cnf(g2,plain,
    outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK1),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t5)]) ).

cnf(g3,plain,
    ( ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1)
    | in_environment(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_time_point_occur)]) ).

cnf(g4,plain,
    ( ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1)
    | subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations)]) ).

cnf(g5,plain,
    ( ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sK1),zero)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,sK1)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_growth_rate_relationships)]) ).

cnf(g6,plain,
    ( ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK1)
    | greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sK1),zero) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2)]) ).

cnf(g7,plain,
    ( ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK1)
    | greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2)]) ).

cnf(g8,plain,
    ( ~ environment(sK0)
    | ~ in_environment(sK0,sK1)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))
    | ~ greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))
    | greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,sK1)) ),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a13)]) ).

cnf(g9,plain,
    greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers)),
    inference(ground_cnf,[],[file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a2)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT036+2 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : satcop --statistics %s
% 0.10/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:43:22 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  % symbols: 15
% 0.10/0.36  % clauses: 14
% 0.10/0.36  % start clauses: 3
% 0.10/0.36  % iterative deepening steps: 28
% 0.10/0.36  % maximum path limit: 2
% 0.10/0.36  % literal attempts: 909
% 0.10/0.36  % depth failures: 587
% 0.10/0.36  % regularity failures: 10
% 0.10/0.36  % tautology failures: 0
% 0.10/0.36  % reductions: 26
% 0.10/0.36  % extensions: 814
% 0.10/0.36  % SAT variables: 201
% 0.10/0.36  % SAT clauses: 286
% 0.10/0.36  % WalkSAT solutions: 279
% 0.10/0.36  % CDCL solutions: 0
% 0.10/0.36  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.36  % SZS output start ListOfCNF for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------