↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 01:26:50 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.15s 5.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   75 (  31   ~;  26   |;  15   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   11 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn  18   !;   6   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_t5_star,conjecture,
    ? [X1,X4] :
      ( outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X4)
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X4)
      & environment(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_t5_star) ).

fof(d2,hypothesis,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
        & environment(X1) )
     => ( ( greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))
          & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero) )
      <=> outcompetes(X3,X2,X4) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',d2) ).

fof(a13_star,hypothesis,
    ? [X1,X4] :
      ( greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,X4))
      & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,X4),zero)
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X4)
      & environment(X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',a13_star) ).

fof(mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3,X4] :
      ( ( subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
        & environment(X1) )
     => subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations) ).

fof(c_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X1,X4] :
        ( outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X4)
        & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X4)
        & environment(X1) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_t5_star]) ).

fof(c_0_5,hypothesis,
    ! [X5,X6,X7,X8] :
      ( ( ~ subpopulations(X6,X7,X5,X8)
        | ~ environment(X5)
        | ~ outcompetes(X7,X6,X8)
        | greater(zero,growth_rate(X6,X8)) )
      & ( ~ subpopulations(X6,X7,X5,X8)
        | ~ environment(X5)
        | ~ outcompetes(X7,X6,X8)
        | greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X7,X8),zero) )
      & ( ~ subpopulations(X6,X7,X5,X8)
        | ~ environment(X5)
        | outcompetes(X7,X6,X8)
        | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X6,X8))
        | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X7,X8),zero) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[d2])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,hypothesis,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0))
    & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),zero)
    & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0)
    & environment(esk1_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[a13_star])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    ! [X11,X12] :
      ( ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X12)
      | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X11,X12)
      | ~ environment(X11) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,hypothesis,
    ( ~ subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2)
    | ~ environment(X4)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)
    | outcompetes(X1,X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,hypothesis,
    greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)
    | ~ environment(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,hypothesis,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,hypothesis,
    environment(esk1_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X13,X14,X15,X16] :
      ( subpopulations(X15,X14,X13,X16)
      | ~ subpopulations(X14,X15,X13,X16)
      | ~ environment(X13) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,hypothesis,
    ( ~ environment(X2)
    | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,X1,X2,esk2_0)
    | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,esk2_0),zero)
    | outcompetes(X1,efficient_producers,esk2_0) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,hypothesis,
    ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)
    | ~ environment(X1)
    | subpopulations(X3,X2,X1,X4) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,hypothesis,
    ( ~ environment(X1)
    | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,esk2_0) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,esk1_0,esk2_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]),c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_12])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/5.38  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.11/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/5.38  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 01:18:46 UTC 2026
% 0.11/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/5.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % new_bool_3 with pid 1116924 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/5.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.44  % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1116929 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.44  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.15/5.44  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/5.44  % Search class: FHHNF-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/5.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.15/5.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.15/5.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Initial clauses                      : 9
% 0.15/5.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 9
% 0.15/5.44  % Processed clauses                    : 15
% 0.15/5.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 15
% 0.15/5.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Generated clauses                    : 12
% 0.15/5.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 8
% 0.15/5.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Paramodulations                      : 12
% 0.15/5.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 11
% 0.15/5.44  % ...of those cached                   : 7
% 0.15/5.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/5.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 15
% 0.15/5.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 5
% 0.15/5.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/5.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 0.15/5.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 9
% 0.15/5.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.15/5.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9
% 0.15/5.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.15/5.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/5.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/5.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 892
% 0.15/5.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 125
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.44  % User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/5.44  % System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.15/5.44  % Total time               : 0.007 s
% 0.15/5.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3632 pages
% 0.15/5.44  
% 0.15/5.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.44  % User time                : 0.005 s
% 0.15/5.44  % System time              : 0.007 s
% 0.15/5.44  % Total time               : 0.013 s
% 0.15/5.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/5.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------