↑ Up

Etableau---0.67.THM-Ass.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep  8 06:09:48 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.40s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep  7 12:41:52 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.40  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.40  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.10/0.40  # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.10/0.40  #
% 0.10/0.40  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.40  # Number of axioms: 9 Number of unprocessed: 9
% 0.10/0.40  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.10/0.40  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.10/0.40  # Hello from C++
% 0.10/0.40  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.10/0.40  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.10/0.40  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.10/0.40  # 9 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.10/0.40  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.10/0.40  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.10/0.40  # Found 4 unit axioms.
% 0.10/0.40  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.10/0.40  # 5 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.10/0.40  # 4 unit axiom clauses
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.10/0.40  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.10/0.40  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.10/0.40  # Returning from population with 13 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.10/0.40  # We now have 13 tableaux to operate on
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.10/0.40  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.10/0.40  # SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.40  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.40  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.40  
% 0.10/0.40  # End clausification derivation
% 0.10/0.40  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (environment(esk1_0))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_7, hypothesis, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_5, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0)))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_6, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),zero))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_2, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))|~outcompetes(X3,X1,X2)|~subpopulations(X1,X3,X4,X2)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_1, plain, (subpopulations(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~subpopulations(X2,X1,X3,X4)|~environment(X3))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_3, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)|~subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_4, hypothesis, (outcompetes(X1,X2,X3)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))|~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X3),zero)|~subpopulations(X2,X1,X4,X3)|~environment(X4))).
% 0.10/0.40  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.10/0.40  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.10/0.40  # Found 8 steps
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_8, hypothesis, (environment(esk1_0)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_51, plain, (environment(esk1_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_91, plain, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_90, plain, (~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,esk2_0)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_4])).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_105, plain, (~greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,esk2_0))), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_5])).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_106, plain, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,esk2_0),zero)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_6])).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_108, plain, (~environment(esk1_0)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.10/0.40  cnf(i_0_107, plain, (~subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,esk1_0,esk2_0)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_107, ...])).
% 0.10/0.40  # End printing tableau
% 0.10/0.40  # SZS output end
% 0.10/0.40  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.10/0.41  # Child (1549634) has found a proof.
% 0.10/0.41  
% 0.10/0.41  # Proof search is over...
% 0.10/0.41  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------