↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:02:54 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.13s 0.37s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   58 (  22   ~;  17   |;  16   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0 sgn   8   !;   8   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations,axiom,
    ! [E,S1,S2,T] :
      ( ( subpopulations(S1,S2,E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => subpopulations(S2,S1,E,T) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations) ).

fof(d2,axiom,
    ! [E,S1,S2,T] :
      ( ( subpopulations(S1,S2,E,T)
        & environment(E) )
     => ( ( greater(zero,growth_rate(S1,T))
          & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(S2,T),zero) )
      <=> outcompetes(S2,S1,T) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',d2) ).

fof(a13_star,axiom,
    ? [E,T] :
      ( greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,T))
      & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,T),zero)
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
      & environment(E) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',a13_star) ).

fof(prove_t5_star,conjecture,
    ? [E,T] :
      ( outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,T)
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
      & environment(E) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_t5_star) ).

fof(prove_t5_star_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [E,T] :
        ( outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,T)
        & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
        & environment(E) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_t5_star]) ).

fof(nnf_3,plain,
    ? [E,T] :
      ( greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,T))
      & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,T),zero)
      & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,E,T)
      & environment(E) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[a13_star]) ).

fof(sk_a13_star,plain,
    ( greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1))
    & greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sK1),zero)
    & subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1)
    & environment(sK0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(E,sK0),skolemize(T,sK1)],[nnf_3]) ).

cnf(c_5,plain,
    environment(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_a13_star]) ).

cnf(c_8,plain,
    ( outcompetes(C,B,D)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(B,D))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(C,D),zero)
    | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[d2]) ).

cnf(c_9,plain,
    ( subpopulations(C,B,A,D)
    | ~ subpopulations(B,C,A,D)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[mp_symmetry_of_subpopulations]) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,B)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,A,B)
    | ~ environment(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_t5_star_neg]) ).

cnf(c_12,plain,
    ( outcompetes(B,A,C)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(A,C))
    | ~ greater_or_equal(growth_rate(B,C),zero)
    | ~ subpopulations(A,B,sK0,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_8]) ).

cnf(c_13,plain,
    greater_or_equal(growth_rate(first_movers,sK1),zero),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_a13_star]) ).

cnf(c_14,plain,
    greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sK1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_a13_star]) ).

cnf(c_16,plain,
    ( outcompetes(first_movers,A,sK1)
    | ~ greater(zero,growth_rate(A,sK1))
    | ~ subpopulations(A,first_movers,sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_13,c_12]) ).

cnf(c_20,plain,
    ( outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK1)
    | ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_14,c_16]) ).

cnf(c_22,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,A)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_10,c_5]) ).

cnf(c_23,plain,
    ( subpopulations(B,A,sK0,C)
    | ~ subpopulations(A,B,sK0,C) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_5,c_9]) ).

cnf(c_24,plain,
    subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_a13_star]) ).

cnf(c_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1)
    | ~ subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_22,c_20]) ).

cnf(c_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_24,c_31]) ).

cnf(c_32,plain,
    subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,sK0,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_23,c_24]) ).

cnf(c_30,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_26,c_32]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : MGT036+3 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 00:06:29 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 2890598 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.09/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 00:06:29 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.36  
% 0.09/0.36  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % Proof 1 at 0.00 (+ 0.00) seconds.
% 0.13/0.37  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.13/0.37  % Level of proof is 6.
% 0.13/0.37  % Maximum clause weight is 10.000.
% 0.13/0.37  % Given clauses 7.
% 0.13/0.37  
% 0.13/0.37  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------