%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSI_E---1.1
% Problem : MGT036-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Sep 8 06:04:32 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.24s 0.55s
% Output : Assurance 0s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : MGT036-1 : TPTP v9.3.0. Released v2.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03 % Command : java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Sep 7 12:35:24 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/0.48 start to proof:theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.55 % Version : CSI_E---1.1
% 0.24/0.55 % Problem : theBenchmark.p
% 0.24/0.55 % Proof found!
% 0.24/0.55 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.24/0.55 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(d2_9, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d2_9)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP_1, axiom, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP_1)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_3, axiom, (environment(X1)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_growth_rate_relationships_3)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(prove_t5_13, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_13)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(prove_t5_14, negated_conjecture, (outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_14)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(prove_t5_12, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', prove_t5_12)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(d2_8, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', d2_8)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_4, axiom, (subpopulations(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_growth_rate_relationships_4)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(a12_10, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~environment(X1)|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a12_10)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(mp_growth_rate_relationships_5, axiom, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_growth_rate_relationships_5)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(mp_time_point_occur_2, axiom, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', mp_time_point_occur_2)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(a2_11, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', a2_11)).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_12, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_9])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_13, plain, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_symmetry_of_FM_and_EP_1])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_14, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X4))|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), c_0_12).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_15, plain, (subpopulations(efficient_producers,first_movers,X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), c_0_13).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_16, plain, (environment(X1)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_growth_rate_relationships_3])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_17, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,X1))|~outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X2,X1)|~environment(X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14, c_0_15])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk1,sk2)), prove_t5_13).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_19, negated_conjecture, (outcompetes(first_movers,efficient_producers,sk2)), prove_t5_14).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_20, negated_conjecture, (environment(sk1)), prove_t5_12).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_21, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[d2_8])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_22, plain, (environment(X1)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X2,X3))), c_0_16).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (greater(zero,growth_rate(efficient_producers,sk2))), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17, c_0_18]), c_0_19]), c_0_20])])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_24, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X3,X4),zero)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(X2,X3,X1,X4)|~outcompetes(X3,X2,X4)), c_0_21).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_25, negated_conjecture, (environment(X1)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22, c_0_23])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_26, plain, (subpopulations(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X4))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_growth_rate_relationships_4])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_27, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)|~subpopulations(X3,X1,X4,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24, c_0_25])])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_28, plain, (subpopulations(X1,X2,X3,X4)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X4))), c_0_26).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_29, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~environment(X1)|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[a12_10])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_30, plain, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_growth_rate_relationships_5])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_31, hypothesis, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~outcompetes(X1,X3,X2)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27, c_0_28])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_32, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~environment(X1)|~in_environment(X1,X2)|~greater(resilience(X4),resilience(X3))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X4,X2))), c_0_29).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_33, plain, (~greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,X2),zero)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))), c_0_30).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_34, negated_conjecture, (greater_or_equal(growth_rate(X1,sk2),zero)|~outcompetes(X1,efficient_producers,sk2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31, c_0_23])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_35, hypothesis, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,X2))|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X3,X2))|~greater(resilience(X3),resilience(X1))|~in_environment(X4,X2)), inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_32, c_0_22])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_36, negated_conjecture, (~outcompetes(X1,efficient_producers,sk2)|~greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,sk2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33, c_0_34])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_37, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[mp_time_point_occur_2])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_38, negated_conjecture, (greater(zero,growth_rate(X1,sk2))|~greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(X1))|~in_environment(X2,sk2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35, c_0_23])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_39, hypothesis, (greater(resilience(efficient_producers),resilience(first_movers))), a2_11).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_40, negated_conjecture, (~greater(zero,growth_rate(first_movers,sk2))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36, c_0_19])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_41, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~environment(X1)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), c_0_37).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_42, hypothesis, (~in_environment(X1,sk2)), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38, c_0_39]), c_0_40])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_43, plain, (in_environment(X1,X2)|~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,X2)), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_41, c_0_25])])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_44, hypothesis, (~subpopulations(first_movers,efficient_producers,X1,sk2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42, c_0_43])).
% 0.24/0.55 cnf(c_0_45, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_18, c_0_44]), ['proof']).
% 0.24/0.55 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.24/0.55 % User time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.55 % System time : 0.004 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.24/0.55 % User time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/0.55 % System time : 0.011 s
% 0.24/0.55 % Total time : 0.025 s
% 0.24/0.55
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------